|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1608-1614 © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |







* Evans Memorial Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
|| Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Manuscript received February 23, 2001; revised manuscript received February 5, 2002, accepted February 25, 2002.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Alice K. Jacobs, Section of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, 88 East Newton Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02118.
alice.jacobs{at}bmc.org
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether women undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain at increased risk in comparison with men and whether the outcomes in women have improved.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that women treated with coronary angioplasty have a higher incidence of procedural morbidity and mortality than men.
METHODS: Gender differences in wave 1 of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Dynamic registry were evaluated. Baseline characteristics and outcomes in women in the Dynamic registry were compared with those in women in the 19851986 and 19931994 NHLBI Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) registries.
RESULTS: Women were older with a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, congestive heart failure, unstable angina and single vessel disease in comparison with men. Although procedural success and in-hospital death (2.2% vs. 1.3%), myocardial infarction (MI) (2.3% vs. 3.0%) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) (1.3% vs. 1.4%) were similar in women and men, respectively, one-year mortality (6.5% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.02) and combined end point of death/MI/CABG (18.3% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.03) were higher in women than in men. After controlling for other factors, gender was not a significant predictor of death or death plus MI at one year. Despite a higher risk profile in women in the Dynamic registry in comparison with women in the 19851986 NHLBI PTCA registry, in-hospital death/MI/CABG was lower (6.0% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite persistent high-risk characteristics in women, gender differences in outcomes in patients undergoing contemporary PCI have decreased, and outcomes in women have improved.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Singh, C. S. Rihal, B. J. Gersh, V. L. Roger, M. R. Bell, R. J. Lennon, A. Lerman, and D. R. Holmes Jr Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2313 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Wilson and G. Raveendran What's good for the gander is now good for the goose. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2321 - 2322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Murphy and C. Steenbergen Gender-based differences in mechanisms of protection in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2007; 75(3): 478 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pilote, K. Dasgupta, V. Guru, K. H. Humphries, J. McGrath, C. Norris, D. Rabi, J. Tremblay, A. Alamian, T. Barnett, et al. A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 13, 2007; 176(6): S1 - S44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G W Mikhail Coronary revascularisation in women Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(suppl_3): iii19 - iii23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stramba-Badiale, K. M. Fox, S. G. Priori, P. Collins, C. Daly, I. Graham, B. Jonsson, K. Schenck-Gustafsson, and M. Tendera Cardiovascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 994 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Bairey Merz, L. J. Shaw, S. E. Reis, V. Bittner, S. F. Kelsey, M. Olson, B. D. Johnson, C. J. Pepine, S. Mankad, B. L. Sharaf, et al. Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: Gender Differences in Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcome With Regard to Gender-Based Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis and Macrovascular and Microvascular Coronary Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3_Suppl_S): S21 - S29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Redberg Gender, Race, and Cardiac Care: Why the Differences? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2005; 46(10): 1852 - 1854. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W Mikhail Coronary heart disease in women BMJ, September 3, 2005; 331(7515): 467 - 468. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Lansky, C. Pietras, R. A. Costa, Y. Tsuchiya, B. R. Brodie, D. A. Cox, E. D. Aymong, T. D. Stuckey, E. Garcia, J. E. Tcheng, et al. Gender Differences in Outcomes After Primary Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting With and Without Abciximab for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial Circulation, April 5, 2005; 111(13): 1611 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Lansky, J. S. Hochman, P. A. Ward, G. S. Mintz, R. Fabunmi, P. B. Berger, G. New, C. L. Grines, C. G. Pietras, M. J. Kern, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy in Women: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 940 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Mieres, L. J. Shaw, A. Arai, M. J. Budoff, S. D. Flamm, W. G. Hundley, T. H. Marwick, L. Mosca, A. R. Patel, M. A. Quinones, et al. Role of Noninvasive Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus Statement From the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 682 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.C. Clayton, S.J. Pocock, R.A. Henderson, P.A. Poole-Wilson, T.R.D. Shaw, R. Knight, and K.A.A. Fox Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? The impact of gender in the RITA 3 trial Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2004; 25(18): 1641 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Nienaber, R. Fattori, R. H. Mehta, B. M. Richartz, A. Evangelista, M. Petzsch, J. V. Cooper, J. L. Januzzi, H. Ince, U. Sechtem, et al. Gender-Related Differences in Acute Aortic Dissection Circulation, June 22, 2004; 109(24): 3014 - 3021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gilbert, J. Raboud, and B. Zinman Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Diabetes on Restenosis Rates Among Patients Receiving Coronary Angioplasty Stenting Diabetes Care, April 1, 2004; 27(4): 990 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dagres, J. R. Clague, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe Significant gender-related differences in radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1103 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Better Outcomes for Women Undergoing Contemporary Coronary Angioplasty Journal Watch Women's Health, August 7, 2002; 2002(807): 8 - 8. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
PCIs in Women: Are Outcomes Improving? Journal Watch (General), June 28, 2002; 2002(628): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |