|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1923-1930 © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
a Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
b Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
c Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
Manuscript received January 23, 2001; revised manuscript received August 8, 2001, accepted August 22, 2001.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Kim A. Eagle, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 3910 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0366, USA.
keagle{at}umich.edu
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether outcomes of nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) differed between low- and high-volume hospitals in patients at different levels of surgical risk.
BACKGROUND: Regionalizing all CABG surgeries from low- to high-volume hospitals could improve surgical outcomes but reduce patient access and choice. "Targeted" regionalization could be a reasonable alternative, however, if subgroups of patients that would clearly benefit from care at high-volume hospitals could be identified.
METHODS: We assessed outcomes of CABG at 56 U.S. hospitals using 1997 administrative and clinical data from Solucient EXPLORE, a national outcomes benchmarking database. Predicted in-hospital mortality rates for subjects were calculated using a logistic regression model, and subjects were classified into five groups based on surgical risk: minimal (<0.5%), low (0.5% to 2%), moderate (2% to 5%), high (5% to 20%), and severe (
20%). We assessed differences in in-hospital mortality, hospital costs and length of stay between low- and high-volume facilities (defined as 200 annual cases) in each of the five risk groups.
RESULTS: A total of 2,029 subjects who underwent CABG at 25 low-volume hospitals and 11,615 subjects who underwent CABG at 31 high-volume hospitals were identified. Significant differences in in-hospital mortality were seen between low- and high-volume facilities in subjects at moderate (5.3% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.007) and high risk (22.6% vs. 11.9%; p = 0.0026) but not in those at minimal, low or severe risk. Hospital costs and lengths of stay were similar across each of the five risk groups. Based on these results, targeted regionalization of subjects at moderate risk or higher to high-volume hospitals would have resulted in an estimated 370 transfers and avoided 16 deaths; in contrast, full regionalization would have led to 2,029 transfers and avoided 20 deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: Targeted regionalization might be a feasible strategy for balancing the clinical benefits of regionalization with patients’ desires for choice and access.
| ||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. M. Shahian and S.-L. T. Normand Low-volume coronary artery bypass surgery: Measuring and optimizing performance. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2008; 135(6): 1202 - 1209. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Ricciardi, B. A. Virnig, J. W. Ogilvie Jr, P. S. Dahlberg, H. P. Selker, and N. N. Baxter Volume-Outcome Relationship for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in an Era of Decreasing Volume Arch Surg, April 1, 2008; 143(4): 338 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. A. Ferraris, F. H. Edwards, D. M. Shahian, and S. P. Ferraris Risk Stratification and Comorbidity Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 199 - 246. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. G. Glance, T. M. Osler, D. B. Mukamel, and A. W. Dick Estimating the potential impact of regionalizing health care delivery based on volume standards versus risk-adjusted mortality rate Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 19(4): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Judge, J. Chard, I. Learmonth, and P. Dieppe The effects of surgical volumes and training centre status on outcomes following total joint replacement: analysis of the Hospital Episode Statistics for England J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 116 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. K. Nallamothu, K. A. Eagle, V. A. Ferraris, and R. M. Sade Should Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Be Regionalized? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1572 - 1581. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Guru, G. M. Anderson, S. E. Fremes, G. T. O'Connor, F. L. Grover, J. V. Tu, and Canadian CABG Surgery Quality Indicator Consensus The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1257 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Al-Khatib, F. L. Lucas, J. G. Jollis, D. J. Malenka, and D. E. Wennberg The Relation Between Patients' Outcomes and the Volume of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation Procedures Performed by Physicians Treating Medicare Beneficiaries J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1536 - 1540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Moscucci, D. Share, D. Smith, M. J. O'Donnell, A. Riba, R. McNamara, T. Lalonde, A. C. Defranco, K. Patel, E. Kline Rogers, et al. Relationship Between Operator Volume and Adverse Outcome in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Practice: An Analysis of a Quality-Controlled Multicenter Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Clinical Database J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 625 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. G. Glance, A. W. Dick, T. M. Osler, and D. B. Mukamel The Relation Between Surgeon Volume and Outcome Following Off-Pump vs On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 829 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. V. Doering, D. K. Moser, W. Lemankiewicz, C. Luper, and S. Khan Depression, Healing, and Recovery From Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2005; 14(4): 316 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Zacharias, T. A. Schwann, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. Shah, T. J. Papadimos, M. Engoren, and R. H. Habib Is Hospital Procedure Volume a Reliable Marker of Quality for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery? A Comparison of Risk and Propensity Adjusted Operative and Midterm Outcomes Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1961 - 1969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. K. Nallamothu, S. Saint, T. P. Hofer, S. Vijan, K. A. Eagle, and S. J. Bernstein Impact of Patient Risk on the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2005; 165(3): 333 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Wu, E. L. Hannan, T. J. Ryan, E. Bennett, A. T. Culliford, J. P. Gold, O. W. Isom, R. H. Jones, B. McNeil, E. A. Rose, et al. Is the Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volumes on the In-Hospital Mortality Rate for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Limited to Patients at High Risk? Circulation, August 17, 2004; 110(7): 784 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. D. Peterson, L. P. Coombs, E. R. DeLong, C. K. Haan, and T. B. Ferguson Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG Surgery JAMA, January 14, 2004; 291(2): 195 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. G. Glance, A. W. Dick, D. B. Mukamel, and T. M. Osler Is the hospital volume-mortality relationship in coronary artery bypass surgery the same for low-risk versus high-risk patients? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1155 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Hannan, C. Wu, T. J. Ryan, E. Bennett, A. T. Culliford, J. P. Gold, A. Hartman, O. W. Isom, R. H. Jones, B. McNeil, et al. Do Hospitals and Surgeons With Higher Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volumes Still Have Lower Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates? Circulation, August 19, 2003; 108(7): 795 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. K. Nallamothu, K. A. Eagle, S. Saint, A. J. Epstein, S. S. Rathore, P. Goodney, J. D. Birkmeyer, and F. L. Lucas Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, Hospital Volume, and Risk * Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, Hospital Volume, and Risk * Response Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108 (1): e6 - e7. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. V. A. Finlayson, P. P. Goodney, and J. D. Birkmeyer Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality in Cancer Surgery: A National Study Arch Surg, July 1, 2003; 138(7): 721 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Shahian and S.-L. T. Normand The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 1048 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. P. Goodney, F.L. Lucas, and J. D. Birkmeyer Should Volume Standards for Cardiovascular Surgery Focus Only on High-Risk Patients? Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 384 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. A. Ferraris and S. P. Ferraris Risk Stratification and Comorbidity Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 187 - 224. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Saint, J. Rose, A. S. Lichter, S. Forrest, and L. F. McMahon Jr. Shifting Costs from High-Cost to Low-Cost Diagnosis-Related Groups? Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2002; 25(3): 259 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Barone, D. A. Risucci, J. A. Savino, B. K. Nallamothu, S. Saint, K. A. Eagle, C. K. Senkowski, D. M. Kocs, A. K. Rowe, M. S. Deming, et al. Volume and Outcome N. Engl. J. Med., August 29, 2002; 347(9): 693 - 696. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. S. Luft Better for whom? Policy implications of acting on the relation between volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1931 - 1933. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
