Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:963-968
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marenzi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marenzi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Agostoni, P.

CLINICAL STUDY

Circulatory response to fluid overload removal by extracorporeal ultrafiltration in refractory congestive heart failure

GianCarlo Marenzi, MDa, Gianfranco Lauri, MDa, Marco Grazi, MDa, Emilio Assanelli, MDa, Jeness Campodonico, MDa and PierGiuseppe Agostoni, MD, PhDa

a Centro Cardiologico Monzino, I.R.C.C.S., Institute of Cardiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Manuscript received January 30, 2001; revised manuscript received May 21, 2001, accepted June 14, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. GianCarlo Marenzi, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, via Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy
giancarlo.marenzi{at}cardiologicomonzino.it

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic and circulatory adjustments to extracorporeal ultrafiltration (UF) in refractory congestive heart failure (rCHF).

BACKGROUND

In rCHF, UF allows clinical improvement and restores diuretic efficacy. However, in the course of a UF session, patients are exposed to rapid variations of body fluid composition so that, as fluid is withdrawn from the intravascular compartment, hypotension or even shock could occur.

METHODS

In 24 patients with rCHF undergoing UF, we measured, after every liter of plasma water removed, hemodynamics, blood gas analysis (in both systemic and pulmonary arteries), plasma volume changes (PV) and plasma refilling rate (PRR). The PV and PRR were calculated by considering hematocrit and ultrafiltrate volume.

RESULTS

In all patients, UF was performed safely, without side effects or hemodynamic instability (ultrafiltrate = 4,880 ± 896 ml). Mean right atrial, pulmonary artery and wedge pressures progressively reduced during the procedure. Cardiac output increased at the end of the procedure and, to a greater extent, 24 h later, in relation to the increase of stroke volume. Heart rate and systemic vascular resistance did not increase, and other peripheral biochemical parameters did not worsen during UF. Intravascular volume remained stable throughout the entire duration of the procedure, indicating that a proportional volume of fluid was refilled from the congested parenchyma.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with rCHF, subtraction of plasma water by UF is associated with hemodynamic improvement. Fluid refilling from the overhydrated interstitium is the major compensatory mechanism for intravascular fluid removal, and hypotension does not occur when plasma refilling rate is adequate to prevent hypovolemia.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  Ht = hematocrit
  NYHA = New York Heart Association
  PRR = plasma refilling rate
  PV = plasma volume
  rCHF = refractory congestive heart failure
  UF = extracorporeal ultrafiltration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Kazory and E. A. Ross
Contemporary Trends in the Pharmacological and Extracorporeal Management of Heart Failure: A Nephrologic Perspective
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 975 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. R. Costanzo, M. E. Guglin, M. T. Saltzberg, M. L. Jessup, B. A. Bart, J. R. Teerlink, B. E. Jaski, J. C. Fang, E. D. Feller, G. J. Haas, et al.
Ultrafiltration Versus Intravenous Diuretics for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 13, 2007; 49(6): 675 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. A. Bart, A. Boyle, A. J. Bank, I. Anand, M. T. Olivari, M. Kraemer, S. Mackedanz, P. A. Sobotka, M. Schollmeyer, and S. R. Goldsmith
Ultrafiltration Versus Usual Care for Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure: The Relief for Acutely Fluid-Overloaded Patients With Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure (RAPID-CHF) Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2043 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Agostoni, G. Cattadori, M. Bianchi, and K. Wasserman
Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Edema in Heart Failure
Circulation, November 25, 2003; 108(21): 2666 - 2671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Marenzi, I. Marana, G. Lauri, E. Assanelli, M. Grazi, J. Campodonico, D. Trabattoni, F. Fabbiocchi, P. Montorsi, and A. L. Bartorelli
The Prevention of Radiocontrast-Agent-Induced Nephropathy by Hemofiltration
N. Engl. J. Med., October 2, 2003; 349(14): 1333 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement