Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1061-1069
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ten Berg, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Thijs Plokker, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ten Berg, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Thijs Plokker, H. W.

CLINICAL STUDY

Influence of planned six-month follow-up angiography on late outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention

A randomized study

Jurriën M. ten Berg, MD*, Johannes C. Kelder, MD*, Maarten Jan Suttorp, MD, PhD*, Freek W. A. Verheugt, MD, PhD, FACC{dagger} and H. W. Thijs Plokker, MD, PhD, FACC*

* Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Manuscript received January 29, 2001; revised manuscript received May 21, 2001, accepted June 14, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. J. M. ten Berg, Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
jurtenberg{at}wxs.nl

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this research was to study the effect of planned angiography on late clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

It is still largely unknown whether planned follow-up angiography after coronary angioplasty influences late outcome.

METHODS

Randomization assigned 527 patients to clinical follow-up alone and 531 to clinical and six-month angiographic follow-up. The effect of planned angiography on clinical outcome at one and three years after coronary angioplasty was studied.

RESULTS

The two groups were well matched. At one year, more events occurred in the angiographic group than in the clinical group: 122 (23.2%) versus 88 (16.7%) (p = 0.01). While the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (MI) was similar at one year, the revascularization rate was higher in the angiographic group: 113 (21.3%) versus 67 (12.7%) (relative risk = 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 2.3, p = 0.0003). At three years, still more events had occurred in the angiographic group (146 [34.5%] vs. 114 [26.3%], p = 0.03). More reinterventions did not improve late survival. However, there was a nonsignificant reduction in MI (7 [1.3%] vs. 13 [2.5%], p = NS) and a significant improvement in functional class at the end of follow-up (freedom from angina 81% vs. 74%, p = 0.03). The effect of follow-up angiography on the reintervention rate was similar for stented and nonstented patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Planned follow-up angiography to evaluate the late results of coronary intervention led to a 1.7 times higher reintervention rate. This effect was similar for stented and nonstented patients. More reinterventions did not improve survival but tended to reduce the incidence of MI and led to a significantly better functional class at follow-up.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BAAS = Balloon Angioplasty and Anticoagulation Study
  BENESTENT-II = BElgium NEtherlands STENT II study
  CABG = coronary artery bypass surgery
  CI = confidence interval
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  RR = relative risk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. W. Stone, A. J. Lansky, S. J. Pocock, B. J. Gersh, G. Dangas, S. C. Wong, B. Witzenbichler, G. Guagliumi, J. Z. Peruga, B. R. Brodie, et al.
Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., May 7, 2009; 360(19): 1946 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. M. Galloe, L. Thuesen, H. Kelbaek, P. Thayssen, K. Rasmussen, P. R. Hansen, N. Bligaard, K. Saunamaki, A. Junker, J. Aaroe, et al.
Comparison of Paclitaxel- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Everyday Clinical Practice: The SORT OUT II Randomized Trial
JAMA, January 30, 2008; 299(4): 409 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Additional Information
JAMA, March 15, 2006; 295(11): E7 - E14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. G. Ellis, J. J. Popma, J. M. Lasala, J. J. Koglin, D. A. Cox, J. Hermiller, C. O'Shaughnessy, J. T. Mann, M. Turco, R. Caputo, et al.
Relationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation: Analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1193 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
ADDITIONAL ARTICLES ABSTRACTED IN ACP JOURNAL CLUB
Evid. Based Med., September 1, 2002; 7(5): 131 - 131.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement