JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1049-1053
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruberg, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lindsay, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gruberg, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lindsay, J., Jr

CLINICAL STUDY

The effect of intracoronary radiation for the treatment of recurrent in-stent restenosis in patients with chronic renal failure

Luis Gruberg, MD*, Ron Waksman, MD, FACC*, Andrew E. Ajani, MD*, Han-Soo Kim, MD*, R. Larry White, MD{dagger}, Ellen Pinnow, MS*, Regina Deible, RN*, Lowell F. Satler, MD, FACC*, Augusto D. Pichard, MD, FACC*, Kenneth K. Kent, MD, PhD, FACC* and Joseph Lindsay, Jr, MD, FACC*

* Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C., USA
{dagger} Washington Cancer Institute at the Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C., USA

Manuscript received March 9, 2001; revised manuscript received June 4, 2001, accepted June 25, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Ron Waksman, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW, Suite 4B-1, Washington, D.C. 20010
rxw8{at}mhg.edu

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to analyze the in-hospital and six-month clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) treated with intracoronary radiation for the prevention of recurrence of in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND

Patients with CRF are at a higher risk than the general population for accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of both beta and gamma radiation in preventing recurrent restenosis in patients with in-stent restenosis.

METHODS

We studied the in-hospital and six-month clinical and angiographic outcomes of 118 patients with CRF and 481 consecutive patients without CRF who were treated with intracoronary radiation for the prevention of recurrence of in-stent restenosis in native coronaries and saphenous vein grafts.

RESULTS

Patients with CRF were usually older, women, hypertensive and diabetic, with multivessel disease and with reduced left ventricular function. In-hospital outcome for patients with CRF was marred by a higher incidence of death, non–Q-wave myocardial infarction and major vascular and bleeding complications. At six-month follow-up, the mortality rate was higher in patients with CRF, 7.6% compared with 1.9% in non-CRF patients (p = 0.003). Restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates were similar in the two groups. In patients with CRF, radiation therapy compared to placebo reduced restenosis (53.8% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.04), TLR (71.4% vs. 15.3%, p < 0.0001) and TVR (78.6% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary radiation for the prevention of recurrence of in-stent restenosis achieved similar rates of restenosis and revascularization procedures in patients with and without CRF. Despite this benefit, patients with renal dysfunction continued to have significantly higher in-hospital and six-month adverse outcomes.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CABG = coronary artery bypass graft
  CRF = chronic renal failure
  CrCl = creatinine clearance
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization
  WRIST = Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. Charytan, J. P. Forman, and D. E. Cutlip
Risk of target lesion revascularization after coronary stenting in patients with and without chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2578 - 2585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. Pinkau, K. F. Hilgers, R. Veelken, and J. F. E. Mann
How Does Minor Renal Dysfunction Influence Cardiovascular Risk and the Management of Cardiovascular Disease?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 517 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
S. H. Rezkalla
Contrast Nephropathy
Clin. Med. Res., October 1, 2003; 1(4): 301 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. A. Herzog
How to Manage the Renal Patient with Coronary Heart Disease: The Agony and the Ecstasy of Opinion-Based Medicine
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 2556 - 2572.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Haller
Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with renal failure: overcoming in-stent restenosis?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 701 - 703.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.