Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:750-755
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.

CLINICAL STUDY: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

Double potentials along the ablation line as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter

Hiroshi Tada, MDa, Hakan Oral, MDa, Christian Sticherling, MDa, Steven P. Chough, MDa, Robert L. Baker, MDa, Kristina Wasmer, MDa, Frank Pelosi, Jr, MDa, Bradley P. Knight, MD, FACCa, S. Adam Strickberger, MD, FACCa and Fred Morady, MD, FACCa

a Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Manuscript received October 13, 2000; revised manuscript received May 9, 2001, accepted May 22, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Fred Morady, Division of Cardiology, B1F245, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0022
fmorady{at}umich.edu

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of double potentials (DPs) that are helpful in guiding ablation within the cavo-tricuspid isthmus.

BACKGROUND

Double potentials have been considered a reliable criterion of cavo-tricuspid isthmus block in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL). However, the minimal degree of separation of the two components of DPs needed to indicate complete block has not been well defined.

METHODS

Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 30 patients with isthmus-dependent AFL. Bipolar electrograms were recorded along the ablation line during proximal coronary sinus pacing at sites at which radiofrequency ablation resulted in incomplete or complete isthmus block.

RESULTS

Double potentials were observed at 42% of recording sites when there was incomplete isthmus block, compared with 100% of recording sites when the block was complete. The mean intervals separating the two components of DPs were 65 ± 21 ms and 135 ± 30 ms during incomplete and complete block, respectively (p < 0.001). An interval separating the two components of DPs (DP1-2 interval) <90 ms was always associated with a local gap, whereas a DP1-2 interval ≥110 ms was always associated with local block. When the DP1-2 interval was between 90 and 110 ms, an isoelectric segment within the DP and a negative polarity in the second component of the DP were helpful in indicating local isthmus block. A DP1-2 interval ≥90 ms with a maximal variation of 15 ms along the entire ablation line was an indicator of complete block in the cavo-tricuspid isthmus.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed analysis of DPs is helpful in identifying gaps in the ablation line and in distinguishing complete from incomplete isthmus block in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of typical AFL.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AFL = atrial flutter
  DP(s) = double potential(s)
  DP1–2 interval = interval separating the two components of double potentials




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Chugh, R. Latchamsetty, H. Oral, D. Elmouchi, D. Tschopp, S. Reich, P. Igic, T. Lemerand, E. Good, F. Bogun, et al.
Characteristics of Cavotricuspid Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter After Left Atrial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 609 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Laurent, C. De Chillou, Gér. Bertaux, I. M. Poull, A. Martel, M. Andronache, S.ép. Fromentin, M. Fraison, S.ép. Gonzalez, F.ço. S. Pierre, et al.
Simple and efficient identification of conduction gaps in post-ablation recurring atrial flutters.
Europace, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 7 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Scharf, S. Veerareddy, M. Ozaydin, A. Chugh, B. Hall, P. Cheung, E. Good, F. Pelosi Jr, F. Morady, and H. Oral
Clinical significance of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 2057 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Feld, M. Wharton, V. Plumb, E. Daoud, T. Friehling, L. Epstein, and EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation System Investigators
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter using large-tip 8- or 10-mm electrode catheters and a high-output radiofrequency energy generator: Results of a multicenter safety and efficacy study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1466 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Andronache, C. de Chillou, H. Miljoen, I. Magnin-Poull, M. Messier, P. Dotto, D. Beurrier, T. Doan, P. Houriez, A. Bineau-Jorisse, et al.
Correlation between electrogram morphology and standard criteria to validate bidirectional cavotricuspid block in common atrial flutter ablation
Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(4): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Morady and H. Tada
Double potentials analysis as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter: Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 916 - 917.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Turco, G. Stabile, A. De Simone, and B. El Jamal
Double potentials analysis as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 916 - 916.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement