Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:527-533
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hu, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hu, B. S.

CLINICAL STUDY: NEW METHODS

Rapid evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass without breath-holding using real-time interactive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging system

Shuichiro Kaji, MD*, Philip C. Yang, MD*, Adam B. Kerr, PhD{dagger}, W. H. Wilson Tang, MD*, Craig H. Meyer, PhD{dagger}, Albert Macovski, PhD{dagger}, John M. Pauly, PhD{dagger}, Dwight G. Nishimura, PhD{dagger} and Bob S. Hu, MD, FACC*

* Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
{dagger} Magnetic Resonance Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

Manuscript received March 24, 2000; revised manuscript received January 16, 2001, accepted April 27, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bob S. Hu, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Room H-2157, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94305-5233
hu{at}Isl.stanford.edu

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to validate cardiac measurements derived from real-time cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as compared with well-validated conventional cine MRI.

BACKGROUND

Although cardiac MRI provides accurate assessment of left ventricular (LV) volume and mass, most techniques have been relatively slow and required electrocardiogram (ECG) gating over many heart beats. A newly developed real-time MRI system allows continuous real-time dynamic acquisition and display without cardiac gating or breath-holding.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers and nine patients with heart failure underwent real-time and cine MRI in the standard short-axis orientation with a 1.5T MRI scanner. Nonbreath-holding cine MRI was performed with ECG gating and respiratory compensation. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular endsystolic volume (LVESV), ejection fraction (EF) and LV mass calculated from the images obtained by real-time MRI were compared to those obtained by cine MRI.

RESULTS

The total study time including localization for real-time MRI was significantly shorter than cine MRI (8.6 ± 2.3 vs. 24.7 ± 3.5 min, p < 0.001). Both imaging techniques yielded good quality images allowing cardiac measurements. The measurements of LVEDV, LVESV, EF and LV mass obtained with real-time MRI showed close correlation with those obtained with cine MRI (LVEDV: r = 0.985, p < 0.001; LVESV: r = 0.994, p < 0.001; EF: r = 0.975, p < 0.001; LV mass: r = 0.977, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time MRI provides accurate measurements of LV volume and mass in a time-efficient manner with respect to image acquisition.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  EDV = end-diastolic volume
  EF = ejection fraction
  ESV = end-systolic volume
  LV = left ventricle/left ventricular
  MRI = magnetic resonance imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Muthurangu, P. Lurz, J. D. Critchely, J. E. Deanfield, A. M. Taylor, and M. S. Hansen
Real-time Assessment of Right and Left Ventricular Volumes and Function in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease by Using High Spatiotemporal Resolution Radial k-t SENSE
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 782 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Terashima, C. H. Meyer, B. G. Keeffe, E. J. Putz, E. de la Pena-Almaguer, P. C. Yang, B. S. Hu, D. G. Nishimura, and M. V. McConnell
Noninvasive assessment of coronary vasodilation using magnetic resonance angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 104 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. Rajappan, N. G. Bellenger, G. Melina, M. Di Terlizzi, M. H. Yacoub, D. J. Sheridan, and D. J. Pennell
Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement - cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 59 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Spuentrup, J. Schroeder, A. H. Mahnken, T. Schaeffter, R. M. Botnar, H. P. Kuhl, P. Hanrath, R. W. Gunther, and A. Buecker
Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Function with Interactive Real-Time Spiral and Radial MR Imaging
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 870 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement