Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:385-393
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schilling, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D. W.

CLINICAL STUDY

Characterization of the anatomy and conduction velocities of the human right atrial flutter circuit determined by noncontact mapping

Richard J. Schilling, MDa, Nicholas S. Peters, MDa, Jeffrey Goldberger, MD{dagger}, Alan H. Kadish, MD{dagger} and D. Wyn Davies, MDa

a St. Mary’s Hospital and Imperial College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Manuscript received January 15, 2000; revised manuscript received March 1, 2001, accepted April 23, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Richard Schilling, Waller Department of Cardiology, St. Mary’s Hospital, Praed St., London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
r.schilling{at}ic.ac.uk

OBJECTIVES

This study was done to characterize human right atrial (RA) flutter (AFL) using noncontact mapping.

BACKGROUND

Atrial flutter has been mapped using sequential techniques, but complex anatomy makes simultaneous global RA mapping difficult.

METHODS

Noncontact mapping was used to map the RA of 13 patients with AFL (5 with previous attempts), 11 with counterclockwise and 2 with clockwise AFL. "Reconstructed" electrograms were validated against contact electrograms using cross-correlation. The Cartesian coordinates of points on a virtual endocardium were used to calculate the length and thus the conduction velocity (CV) of the AFL wave front within the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cave isthmus (IS) and either side of the crista terminalis (CT).

RESULTS

When clearly seen, the AFL wave front split (n = 3) or turned in the region of the coronary sinus os (n = 6). Activation progressed toward the tricuspid annulus (TA) from the surrounding RA in 10 patients, suggesting that the leading edge of the reentry wave front is not always at the TA. The IS length and CV was 47.73 ± 24.40 mm (mean ± SD) and 0.74 ± 0.36 m/s. The CV was similar for the smooth and trabeculated RA (1.16 ± 0.48 m/s and 1.22 ± 0.65 m/s, respectively [p = 0.67]) and faster than the IS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05 for smooth and trabeculated, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Noncontact mapping of AFL has been validated and has demonstrated that IS CV is significantly slower than either side of the CT.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AFL = atrial flutter
  ASD = atrial septal defect
  CI = confidence interval
  CS = coronary sinus
  CT = crista terminalis
  CV = conduction velocity
  ECG = electrocardiograms
  IS = tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cava isthmus
  IVC = inferior vena cava
  LAO = left anterior oblique
  MEA = multielectrode array
  RA = right atrium/atrial
  SVC = superior vena cava
  TA = tricuspid annulus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. Liew, A. Catanchin, E. R. Behr, and D. Ward
Use of non-contact mapping in the treatment of right atrial tachycardias in patients with and without congenital heart disease
Europace, August 1, 2008; 10(8): 972 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. J. Abrams, M. J. Earley, S. C. Sporton, P. M. Kistler, M. A. Gatzoulis, M. J. Mullen, J. A. Till, S. Cullen, F. Walker, M. D. Lowe, et al.
Comparison of Noncontact and Electroanatomic Mapping to Identify Scar and Arrhythmia Late After the Fontan Procedure
Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1738 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. M. Narayan, A. Hassankhani, G. K. Feld, and V. Bhargava
Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1269 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C.-T. Tai, T.-Y. Liu, P.-C. Lee, Y.-J. Lin, M.-S. Chang, and S.-A. Chen
Non-contact mapping to guide radiofrequency ablation of atypical right atrial flutter
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1080 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P D Lambiase, A Rinaldi, J Hauck, M Mobb, D Elliott, S Mohammad, J S Gill, and C A Bucknall
Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 44 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement