|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:385-393 © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |


a St. Marys Hospital and Imperial College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Manuscript received January 15, 2000; revised manuscript received March 1, 2001, accepted April 23, 2001.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Richard Schilling, Waller Department of Cardiology, St. Marys Hospital, Praed St., London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
r.schilling{at}ic.ac.uk
OBJECTIVES
This study was done to characterize human right atrial (RA) flutter (AFL) using noncontact mapping.
BACKGROUND
Atrial flutter has been mapped using sequential techniques, but complex anatomy makes simultaneous global RA mapping difficult.
METHODS
Noncontact mapping was used to map the RA of 13 patients with AFL (5 with previous attempts), 11 with counterclockwise and 2 with clockwise AFL. "Reconstructed" electrograms were validated against contact electrograms using cross-correlation. The Cartesian coordinates of points on a virtual endocardium were used to calculate the length and thus the conduction velocity (CV) of the AFL wave front within the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cave isthmus (IS) and either side of the crista terminalis (CT).
RESULTS
When clearly seen, the AFL wave front split (n = 3) or turned in the region of the coronary sinus os (n = 6). Activation progressed toward the tricuspid annulus (TA) from the surrounding RA in 10 patients, suggesting that the leading edge of the reentry wave front is not always at the TA. The IS length and CV was 47.73 ± 24.40 mm (mean ± SD) and 0.74 ± 0.36 m/s. The CV was similar for the smooth and trabeculated RA (1.16 ± 0.48 m/s and 1.22 ± 0.65 m/s, respectively [p = 0.67]) and faster than the IS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05 for smooth and trabeculated, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Noncontact mapping of AFL has been validated and has demonstrated that IS CV is significantly slower than either side of the CT.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Liew, A. Catanchin, E. R. Behr, and D. Ward Use of non-contact mapping in the treatment of right atrial tachycardias in patients with and without congenital heart disease Europace, August 1, 2008; 10(8): 972 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Abrams, M. J. Earley, S. C. Sporton, P. M. Kistler, M. A. Gatzoulis, M. J. Mullen, J. A. Till, S. Cullen, F. Walker, M. D. Lowe, et al. Comparison of Noncontact and Electroanatomic Mapping to Identify Scar and Arrhythmia Late After the Fontan Procedure Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1738 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Narayan, A. Hassankhani, G. K. Feld, and V. Bhargava Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Tai, T.-Y. Liu, P.-C. Lee, Y.-J. Lin, M.-S. Chang, and S.-A. Chen Non-contact mapping to guide radiofrequency ablation of atypical right atrial flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P D Lambiase, A Rinaldi, J Hauck, M Mobb, D Elliott, S Mohammad, J S Gill, and C A Bucknall Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 44 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |