This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bruch, C. Articles by Erbel, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bruch, C. Articles by Erbel, R.

CLINICAL STUDY

Changes in QRS voltage in cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion: reversibility after pericardiocentesis and after anti-inflammatory drug treatment

^a Department of Cardiology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany

Manuscript received June 12, 2000; revised manuscript received February 2, 2001, accepted March 28, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Christian Bruch, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Innere Medizin C, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, 48149 Münster, Germany
bruchc{at}uni-muenster.de

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to define the association between low QRS voltage and cardiac tamponade or pericardial effusion and to assess the reversibility of low QRS voltage after therapeutic procedures.

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether low QRS voltage is a sign of cardiac tamponade or whether it is a sign of pericardial effusion per se.

METHODS

In a prospective study design, we recorded consecutive 12-lead electrocardiograms and echocardiograms in 43 patients who were referred to our institution for evaluation and therapy of a significant pericardial effusion. Cardiac tamponade was present in 23 patients (53%). Low QRS voltage (defined as maximum QRS amplitude <0.5 mV in the limb leads) was found in 14 of these 23 subjects (61%). Nine of these 14 patients were treated by pericardiocentesis (group A). Five patients received anti-inflammatory medication (group B). Group C consisted of nine patients with pericarditis and significant pericardial effusion who had no clinical evidence of tamponade.

RESULTS

In group A, low QRS voltage remained largely unchanged immediately after successful pericardiocentesis (0.36 ± 0.17 mV before vs. 0.42 ± 0.21 mV after, p = NS), but QRS amplitude recovered within a week (0.78 ± 0.33 mV, p < 0.001). In group B, the maximum QRS amplitude increased from 0.40 ± 0.20 mV to 0.80 ± 0.36 mV (p < 0.001) within six days. In group C, all patients had a normal QRS amplitude initially (1.09 ± 0.55 mV) and during a seven-day follow-up (1.10 ± 0.56 mV, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Low QRS voltage is a feature of cardiac tamponade but not of pericardial effusion per se. Our findings indicate that the presence and severity of cardiac tamponade, in addition to inflammatory mechanisms, may contribute to the development of low QRS voltage in patients with large pericardial effusions.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CI = confidence interval   ECG = electrocardiogram   LV = left ventricle or left ventricular

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Cuculi, P. Jamshidi, R. Kobza, M. Rohacek, and P. Erne Precordial low voltage in patients with ascites Europace, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 96 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Habashy, A. Mittal, N. Ravichandran, and G. Cherian The Electrocardiogram in Large Pericardial Effusion: The Forgotten "P" Wave and the Influence of Tamponade, Size, Etiology, and Pericardial Thickness on QRS Voltage Angiology, May 1, 2004; 55(3): 303 - 307. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Task Force members, B. Maisch, P. M. Seferovic, A. D. Ristic, R. Erbel, R. Rienmuller, Y. Adler, W. Z. Tomkowski, G. Thiene, M. H. Yacoub, et al. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases Executive Summary: The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2004; 25(7): 587 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF]