|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:219-226 © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
a Department of Cardiology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
Manuscript received June 12, 2000; revised manuscript received February 2, 2001, accepted March 28, 2001.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Christian Bruch, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Innere Medizin C, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, 48149 Münster, Germany
bruchc{at}uni-muenster.de
OBJECTIVES
The goal of this study was to define the association between low QRS voltage and cardiac tamponade or pericardial effusion and to assess the reversibility of low QRS voltage after therapeutic procedures.
BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether low QRS voltage is a sign of cardiac tamponade or whether it is a sign of pericardial effusion per se.
METHODS
In a prospective study design, we recorded consecutive 12-lead electrocardiograms and echocardiograms in 43 patients who were referred to our institution for evaluation and therapy of a significant pericardial effusion. Cardiac tamponade was present in 23 patients (53%). Low QRS voltage (defined as maximum QRS amplitude <0.5 mV in the limb leads) was found in 14 of these 23 subjects (61%). Nine of these 14 patients were treated by pericardiocentesis (group A). Five patients received anti-inflammatory medication (group B). Group C consisted of nine patients with pericarditis and significant pericardial effusion who had no clinical evidence of tamponade.
RESULTS
In group A, low QRS voltage remained largely unchanged immediately after successful pericardiocentesis (0.36 ± 0.17 mV before vs. 0.42 ± 0.21 mV after, p = NS), but QRS amplitude recovered within a week (0.78 ± 0.33 mV, p < 0.001). In group B, the maximum QRS amplitude increased from 0.40 ± 0.20 mV to 0.80 ± 0.36 mV (p < 0.001) within six days. In group C, all patients had a normal QRS amplitude initially (1.09 ± 0.55 mV) and during a seven-day follow-up (1.10 ± 0.56 mV, p = NS).
CONCLUSIONS
Low QRS voltage is a feature of cardiac tamponade but not of pericardial effusion per se. Our findings indicate that the presence and severity of cardiac tamponade, in addition to inflammatory mechanisms, may contribute to the development of low QRS voltage in patients with large pericardial effusions.
| ||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Cuculi, P. Jamshidi, R. Kobza, M. Rohacek, and P. Erne Precordial low voltage in patients with ascites Europace, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 96 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Habashy, A. Mittal, N. Ravichandran, and G. Cherian The Electrocardiogram in Large Pericardial Effusion: The Forgotten "P" Wave and the Influence of Tamponade, Size, Etiology, and Pericardial Thickness on QRS Voltage Angiology, May 1, 2004; 55(3): 303 - 307. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Task Force members, B. Maisch, P. M. Seferovic, A. D. Ristic, R. Erbel, R. Rienmuller, Y. Adler, W. Z. Tomkowski, G. Thiene, M. H. Yacoub, et al. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases Executive Summary: The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2004; 25(7): 587 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |