Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:2053-2058
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathew, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B. J.

CLINICAL STUDY: UNSTABLE ANGINA

Clinical risk stratification correlates with the angiographic extent of coronary artery disease in unstable angina

Verghese Mathew, MD, FACCa, Michael Farkouh, MD, FACCa, Diane E. Grill, MSa, Lynn H. Urban, MSa, Jack T. Cusma, PhDa, Guy S. Reeder, MD, FACCa, David R. Holmes, Jr, MD, FACCa and Bernard J. Gersh, MB, DPhil, ChB, FACCa

a Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Manuscript received July 10, 2000; revised manuscript received February 16, 2001, accepted March 1, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Verghese Mathew, Mayo Clinic, Rm 4-523 Mary Brigh, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
mathew.verghese{at}mayo.edu

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether clinical risk stratification correlates with the angiographic extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patient with unstable angina.

BACKGROUND

The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guidelines stratify patients with unstable angina according to short-term risk of myocardial infarction or death. Whether these guidelines are useful in predicting the extent of CAD is unknown.

METHODS

All residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, undergoing emergency department evaluation from January 1, 1985 through December 31, 1992 for unstable angina without a history of prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and who underwent early angiography (within seven days of presentation) were classified into low, intermediate and high risk subgroups based on AHCPR criteria.

RESULTS

Seven hundred ninety-five patients underwent early angiography: 159 high risk, 572 intermediate risk and 64 low risk patients. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that low risk patients had a greater likelihood of normal or mild CAD relative to intermediate risk (odds ratio [OR], 4.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.70–8.06; p < 0.001) and high risk (OR, 11.1; 95% CI, 5.71–22.2; p < 0.001). Significant 1-, 2-, 3-vessel coronary disease or left main coronary disease was more likely in high relative to low risk (OR, 8.09; 95% CI, 4.22–15.5; p < 0.001), intermediate relative to low risk (OR, 4.11; 95% CI, 2.34–7.22; p < 0.001), and high relative to intermediate risk (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.31–2.96; p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with unstable angina undergoing early coronary angiography, risk stratification according to the AHCPR guidelines correlates with the angiographic extent of CAD.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AHCPR = Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CI = confidence interval
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  FRISC = Fragmin and fast Revascularization during InStability of Coronary artery disease
  MI = myocardial infarction
  OR = odds ratio




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. A. Henrikson, E. E. Howell, D. E. Bush, J. S. Miles, G. R. Meininger, T. Friedlander, A. C. Bushnell, and N. Chandra-Strobos
Chest Pain Relief by Nitroglycerin Does Not Predict Active Coronary Artery Disease
Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2003; 139(12): 979 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Prasad, V. Mathew, D. R Holmes Jr., and B. J Gersh
Current management of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: reconciling the results of randomized controlled trials
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2003; 24(17): 1544 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. A. Barrabes, J. Figueras, C. Moure, J. Cortadellas, and J. Soler-Soler
Prognostic Value of Lead aVR in Patients With a First Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, August 19, 2003; 108(7): 814 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Hamon, S Fradin, A Denizet, E Filippi-Codaccioni, G Grollier, and R Morello
Prospective evaluation of the effect of an angiotensin I converting enzyme gene polymorphism on the long term risk of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention
Heart, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 321 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. K. Natarajan, S. R. Mehta, D. H. Holder, D. R. Goodhart, A. Gafni, D. Shilton, R. Afzal, K. Teo, and S. Yusuf
The risks of waiting for cardiac catheterization: a prospective study
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 26, 2002; 167(11): 1233 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement