Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1329-1334
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, P. J.

CLINICAL STUDY

Long-term vessel response to a self-expanding coronary stent: a serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the ASSURE trial

Yoshiki Kobayashi, MD*, Yasuhiro Honda, MD*, Leonard G. Christie, MD, FACC{dagger}, Paul S. Teirstein, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Steven R. Bailey, MD, FACC§, Charles L. Brown, III, MD, FACC||, Ray V. Matthews, MD, FACC, Anthony C. De Franco, MD, FACC#, Robert S. Schwartz, MD, FACC**, Sheldon Goldberg, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger}, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC{ddagger}{ddagger}, Paul G. Yock, MD, FACC* and Peter J. Fitzgerald, MD, PhD, FACC*

* Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
{dagger} Cardiovascular Associates, Eugene, Oregon, USA
{ddagger} Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA
§ University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
|| Piedmont Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Los Angeles Cardiology Associates, Los Angeles, California, USA
# Moses Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
** Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Cooper Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
{ddagger}{ddagger} Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Manuscript received January 19, 2000; revised manuscript received December 8, 2000, accepted December 27, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Peter J. Fitzgerald, Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H3554, Stanford, California 94305-5637

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the in vivo mechanical properties of a new self-expanding coronary stent (RADIUS) and, particularly, the subsequent vessel response over time.

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have suggested that self-expanding stents may produce less vessel wall injury at initial deployment, leading to larger follow-up lumens than with balloon-expandable stents. However, the influence of the chronic stimulus from self-expanding stents on the vessel wall remains unknown.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned to either the RADIUS self-expanding stent group (n = 32) or the Palmaz-Schatz balloon-expandable stent group (n = 30). Intravascular ultrasound was performed after stent deployment and at six-month follow-up.

RESULTS

At follow-up, the RADIUS stents had increased 23.6% in overall volume, while the Palmaz-Schatz stents had remained unchanged. Due to the greater mean neointimal area (3.0 ± 1.7 mm2 vs. 1.9 ± 1.2 mm2, p = 0.02) in the RADIUS group, no significant difference in net late lumen loss was observed between the two groups. On the other hand, analysis at the peristent margins demonstrated that mean late loss was significantly smaller in the RADIUS group than it was in the Palmaz-Schatz group (0.1 ± 2.1 mm2 vs. 1.9 ± 2.4 mm2, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial volumetric IVUS revealed that the RADIUS stents continued to enlarge during the follow-up period. In this stent implantation protocol, this expansion was accompanied by a greater amount of neointima than the Palmaz-Schatz stents, resulting in similar late lumen loss in both configurations. In the peristent margins, however, late lumen loss was minimized with the RADIUS stents.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ASSURE = A Stent vs. Stent Ultrasound Remodeling Evaluation
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  SCORES = Stent COmparative REStenosis trial




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. J. Clark, S. Lessio, M. O'Donoghue, C. Tsalamandris, R. Schainfeld, and K. Rosenfield
Mechanisms and Predictors of Carotid Artery Stent Restenosis: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2390 - 2396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Spanos, G. Stankovic, J. Tobis, and A. Colombo
The challenge of in-stent restenosis: insights from intravascular ultrasound
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2003; 24(2): 138 - 150.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Roguin and R. Beyar
A stent with extent--fiction or prophecy?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 6, 2002; 39(3): 558 - 558.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement