CLINICAL STUDY
Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestambi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease
Steven A. J. Chamuleau, MD*,
Martijn Meuwissen, MD*,
Berthe L. F. van Eck-Smit, MD ,
Karel T. Koch, MD*,
Angelina de Jong, MSc*,
Robbert J. de Winter, MD*,
Carl E. Schotborgh, MD*,
Matthijs Bax, MD*,
Hein J. Verberne, MD,
Jan G. P. Tijssen, PhD* and
Jan J. Piek, MD*,1
* Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Manuscript received March 9, 2000;
revised manuscript received December 7, 2000,
accepted December 27, 2000.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. J. J. Piek, Department of Cardiology, Room B2-108, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
s.a.chamuleau{at}amc.uva.nl
OBJECTIVES
We sought to perform a direct comparison between perfusion scintigraphic results and intracoronary-derived hemodynamic variables (fractional flow reserve [FFR]; absolute and relative coronary flow velocity reserve [CFVR and rCFVR, respectively]) in patients with two-vessel disease.
BACKGROUND
There is limited information on the diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary-derived variables (CFVR, FFR and rCFVR) in patients with multivessel disease.
METHODS
Dipyridamole technetium-99m sestambi (MIBI) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed in 127 patients. The presence of reversible perfusion defects in the region of interest was determined. Within one week, angiography was performed; CFVR, rCFVR and FFR were determined in 161 coronary lesions after intracoronary administration of adenosine. The predictive value for the presence of reversible perfusion defects on MIBI SPECT of CFVR, rCFVR and FFR was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curves.
RESULTS
The mean percentage diameter stenosis was 57% (range 35% to 85%), as measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Using per-patient analysis, the AUCs for CFVR (0.70 ± 0.052), rCFVR (0.72 ± 0.051) and FFR (0.76 ± 0.050) were not significantly different (p = NS). The percentages of agreement with the results of MIBI SPECT were 76%, 78% and 77% for CFVR, rCFVR and FFR, respectively. Per-lesion analysis, using all 161 measured lesions, yielded similar results.
CONCLUSIONS
The diagnostic accuracy of three intracoronary-derived hemodynamic variables, as compared with the results of perfusion scintigraphy, is similar in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. Cut-off values of 2.0 for CFVR, 0.65 for rCFVR and 0.75 for FFR can be used for clinical decision-making in this patient cohort. Discordant results were obtained in 23% of the cases that require prospective evaluation for appropriate patient management.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AUC | = area under the curve | | CFVR and rCFVR | = coronary flow velocity reserve and relative coronary flow velocity reserve, respectively | | FFR | = fractional flow reserve | | LAD | = left anterior descending coronary artery | | LCx | = left circumflex coronary artery | | MIBI | = technetium-99m labeled sestambi | | RCA | = right coronary artery | | ROC | = receiver operating characteristics | | SPECT | = single-photon emission computed tomography |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. J. Kern and H. Samady
Current Concepts of Integrated Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 19, 2010;
55(3):
173 - 185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Gardner, H. Tan, E. L. Hull, J. B. Lisauskas, S. T. Sum, T. M. Meese, C. Jiang, S. P. Madden, J. D. Caplan, A. P. Burke, et al.
Detection of lipid core coronary plaques in autopsy specimens with a novel catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy system.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
September 1, 2008;
1(5):
638 - 648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Costa, S. Shoemaker, H. Futamatsu, C. Klassen, D. J. Angiolillo, M. Nguyen, A. Siuciak, P. Gilmore, M. M. Zenni, L. Guzman, et al.
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging Detects Anatomic and Physiologic Coronary Artery Disease as Measured by Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 7, 2007;
50(6):
514 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. Barmeyer, A. Stork, K. Muellerleile, C. Tiburtius, A. K. Schofer, T. A. Heitzer, T. Hofmann, G. Adam, T. Meinertz, and G. K. Lund
Contrast-enhanced Cardiac MR Imaging in the Detection of Reduced Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve
Radiology,
May 1, 2007;
243(2):
377 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. Verberne, M. Meuwissen, S. A. J. Chamuleau, B.-J. Verhoeff, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, J. A. E. Spaan, J. J. Piek, and M. Siebes
Effect of simultaneous intracoronary guidewires on the predictive accuracy of functional parameters of coronary lesion severity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
May 1, 2007;
292(5):
H2349 - H2355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. J. Marques, M. J. van Eenige, H. J. Spruijt, N. Westerhof, J. Twisk, C. A. Visser, and F. C. Visser
The diastolic flow velocity-pressure gradient relation and dpv50 to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
December 1, 2006;
291(6):
H2630 - H2635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Kern, A. Lerman, J.-W. Bech, B. De Bruyne, E. Eeckhout, W. F. Fearon, S. T. Higano, M. J. Lim, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, et al.
Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology
Circulation,
September 19, 2006;
114(12):
1321 - 1341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Bittl
The Future of an Illusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 20, 2006;
47(12):
2380 - 2383.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Legalery, F. Schiele, M.-F. Seronde, N. Meneveau, H. Wei, K. Didier, M.-C. Blonde, F. Caulfield, and J.-P. Bassand
One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty
Eur. Heart J.,
December 2, 2005;
26(24):
2623 - 2629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Pereztol-Valdes, J. Candell-Riera, C. Santana-Boado, J. Angel, S. Aguade-Bruix, J. Castell-Conesa, E. V. Garcia, and J. Soler-Soler
Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary arteries
Eur. Heart J.,
December 2, 2005;
26(24):
2637 - 2643.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kruger, K.-C. Koch, I. Kaumanns, M. W. Merx, P. Hanrath, and R. Hoffmann
Clinical Significance of Fractional Flow Reserve for Evaluation of Functional Lesion Severity in Stent Restenosis and Native Coronary Arteries
Chest,
September 1, 2005;
128(3):
1645 - 1649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Berger, K.-J. Botman, P. A. MacCarthy, W. Wijns, J. Bartunek, G. R. Heyndrickx, N. H.J. Pijls, and B. De Bruyne
Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 2, 2005;
46(3):
438 - 442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hacker, T. Jakobs, F. Matthiesen, C. Vollmar, K. Nikolaou, C. Becker, A. Knez, T. Pfluger, M. Reiser, K. Hahn, et al.
Comparison of Spiral Multidetector CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in the Noninvasive Detection of Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Lesions: First Clinical Experiences
J. Nucl. Med.,
August 1, 2005;
46(8):
1294 - 1300.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. P. Salm, J. J. Bax, H. W. Vliegen, S. E. Langerak, P. Dibbets, J. W. Jukema, H. J. Lamb, E. K.J. Pauwels, A. de Roos, and E. E. van der Wall
Functional significance of stenoses in coronary artery bypass grafts: Evaluation by single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 2, 2004;
44(9):
1877 - 1882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Orford, A. Lerman, and D. R. Holmes
Routine intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention: A critical reappraisal
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 21, 2004;
43(8):
1335 - 1342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. F. Fearon, H.M. O. Farouque, L. B. Balsam, D. T. Cooke, R. C. Robbins, P. J. Fitzgerald, A. C. Yeung, and P. G. Yock
Comparison of Coronary Thermodilution and Doppler Velocity for Assessing Coronary Flow Reserve
Circulation,
November 4, 2003;
108(18):
2198 - 2200.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. J. Chamuleau, M. Siebes, M. Meuwissen, K. T. Koch, J. A. E. Spaan, and J. J. Piek
Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 2003;
285(5):
H2194 - H2200.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Voudris, D. Avramides, M. Koutelou, J. Malakos, A. Manginas, M. Papadakis, and D. V. Cokkinos
Relative Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Improves Correlation With Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses
Chest,
October 1, 2003;
124(4):
1266 - 1274.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G. Stoel, F. Zijlstra, and C. A. Visser
Frame Count Reserve
Circulation,
June 24, 2003;
107(24):
3034 - 3039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. H. J. Pijls
Is it time to measure fractional flow reserve in all patients?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 2, 2003;
41(7):
1122 - 1124.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D V Cokkinos, A Manginas, and V Voudris
Coronary flow: clinical considerations
Heart,
April 1, 2003;
89(4):
361 - 363.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Hiraishi, H. Hirota, Y. Horiguchi, N. Takeda, N. Fujino, N. Ogawa, and Y. Nakahata
Transthoracic Doppler assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve in children with Kawasaki disease: Comparison with coronary angiography and thallium-201 imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 20, 2002;
40(10):
1816 - 1824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Siebes, S. A. J. Chamuleau, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, and J. A. E. Spaan
Influence of hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve: parametric analysis of underlying model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
October 1, 2002;
283(4):
H1462 - H1470.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Meuwissen, M. Siebes, S. A.J. Chamuleau, B. L.F. van Eck-Smit, K. T. Koch, R. J. de Winter, J. G.P. Tijssen, J. A.E. Spaan, and J. J. Piek
Hyperemic Stenosis Resistance Index for Evaluation of Functional Coronary Lesion Severity
Circulation,
July 23, 2002;
106(4):
441 - 446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Miller
Coronary flow studies for risk stratification in multivessel disease: A physiologic bridge too far?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 6, 2002;
39(5):
859 - 863.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
