Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1259-1265
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scrutinio, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scrutinio, D.

CLINICAL STUDY: ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES

Ticlopidine versus aspirin after myocardial infarction (stami) trial

Domenico Scrutinio, MD*, Claudio Cimminiello, MD{dagger}, Ettore Marubini, PhD{ddagger}, Maria Vittoria Pitzalis, MD§, Matteo Di Biase, MD||, Paolo Rizzon, MD§ the STAMI Group

* Division of Cardiology, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Institute of Rehabilitation, Cassano Murge, Bari, Italy
{dagger} Medical Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Vimercate Hospital, Milan, Italy
{ddagger} Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
§ Institute of Cardiology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
|| Division of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. This study was supported by a grant from Sanofi-Synthelabo, Milan, Italy

Manuscript received July 26, 2000; revised manuscript received December 13, 2000, accepted January 5, 2001.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Domenico Scrutinio, Division of Cardiology, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Institute of Rehabilitation, 70020 Cassano Murge, Bari, Italy
dscrutinio{at}fsm.it

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the efficacy of aspirin and ticlopidine in survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND

The role of ticlopidine in secondary prevention after AMI has not yet been explored.

METHODS

Of 4,696 patients with AMI treated with thrombolysis who were screened, 261 died in the hospital (5.6%) and 1,470 were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial and allocated to treatment with either aspirin (160 mg/day) or ticlopidine (500 mg/day). The most frequent reasons for exclusion were refusal to give informed consent, planned myocardial revascularization, risk of noncompliance with study procedures, need for anticoagulant therapy and contraindications to the study treatments. The primary end point was the first occurrence of any of the following events during the six-month follow-up: fatal and nonfatal AMI, fatal and nonfatal stroke, angina with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia, vascular death or death due to any other cause.

RESULTS

The primary end point was recorded in 59 (8.0%) of the 736 aspirin-treated and 59 (8.0%) of the 734 ticlopidine-treated patients (p = 0.966). Vascular death was the first event in five patients taking aspirin and in six patients taking ticlopidine (0.7% vs. 0.8%; p = NS); nonfatal AMI in 18 and 8 (2.4% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.049); nonfatal stroke in 3 and 4 (0.4% vs. 0.5%; p = NS); and angina in 33 and 40 (4.5% vs. 5.4%; p = NS), respectively. The frequency of adverse reactions was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was found between the ticlopidine and aspirin groups in the rate of the primary combined end point of death, recurrent AMI, stroke and angina.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ADP = adenosine diphosphate
  AMI = acute myocardial infarction
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  ECG = electrocardiogram




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Patrono, C. Baigent, J. Hirsh, and G. Roth
Antiplatelet Drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 199S - 233S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. A. Meadows and D. L. Bhatt
Clinical Aspects of Platelet Inhibitors and Thrombus Formation
Circ. Res., May 11, 2007; 100(9): 1261 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Patrono, B. Coller, G. A. FitzGerald, J. Hirsh, and G. Roth
Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 234S - 264S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Patrono, F. Bachmann, C. Baigent, C. Bode, R. De Caterina, B. Charbonnier, D. Fitzgerald, J. Hirsh, S. Husted, J. Kvasnicka, et al.
Expert Consensus Document on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents: The Task Force on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2004; 25(2): 166 - 181.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement