CLINICAL STUDY: ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES
Ticlopidine versus aspirin after myocardial infarction (stami) trial
Domenico Scrutinio, MD*,
Claudio Cimminiello, MD ,
Ettore Marubini, PhD ,
Maria Vittoria Pitzalis, MD ,
Matteo Di Biase, MD||,
Paolo Rizzon, MD the STAMI Group
* Division of Cardiology, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Institute of Rehabilitation, Cassano Murge, Bari, Italy
Medical Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Vimercate Hospital, Milan, Italy
Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Institute of Cardiology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
|| Division of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. This study was supported by a grant from Sanofi-Synthelabo, Milan, Italy
Manuscript received July 26, 2000;
revised manuscript received December 13, 2000,
accepted January 5, 2001.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Domenico Scrutinio, Division of Cardiology, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Institute of Rehabilitation, 70020 Cassano Murge, Bari, Italy dscrutinio{at}fsm.it
OBJECTIVES
We sought to compare the efficacy of aspirin and ticlopidine in survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with thrombolysis.
BACKGROUND
The role of ticlopidine in secondary prevention after AMI has not yet been explored.
METHODS
Of 4,696 patients with AMI treated with thrombolysis who were screened, 261 died in the hospital (5.6%) and 1,470 were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial and allocated to treatment with either aspirin (160 mg/day) or ticlopidine (500 mg/day). The most frequent reasons for exclusion were refusal to give informed consent, planned myocardial revascularization, risk of noncompliance with study procedures, need for anticoagulant therapy and contraindications to the study treatments. The primary end point was the first occurrence of any of the following events during the six-month follow-up: fatal and nonfatal AMI, fatal and nonfatal stroke, angina with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia, vascular death or death due to any other cause.
RESULTS
The primary end point was recorded in 59 (8.0%) of the 736 aspirin-treated and 59 (8.0%) of the 734 ticlopidine-treated patients (p = 0.966). Vascular death was the first event in five patients taking aspirin and in six patients taking ticlopidine (0.7% vs. 0.8%; p = NS); nonfatal AMI in 18 and 8 (2.4% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.049); nonfatal stroke in 3 and 4 (0.4% vs. 0.5%; p = NS); and angina in 33 and 40 (4.5% vs. 5.4%; p = NS), respectively. The frequency of adverse reactions was not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
No difference was found between the ticlopidine and aspirin groups in the rate of the primary combined end point of death, recurrent AMI, stroke and angina.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ADP | = adenosine diphosphate | | AMI | = acute myocardial infarction | | CAD | = coronary artery disease | | ECG | = electrocardiogram |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Patrono, C. Baigent, J. Hirsh, and G. Roth
Antiplatelet Drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest,
June 1, 2008;
133(6_suppl):
199S - 233S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Meadows and D. L. Bhatt
Clinical Aspects of Platelet Inhibitors and Thrombus Formation
Circ. Res.,
May 11, 2007;
100(9):
1261 - 1275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Patrono, B. Coller, G. A. FitzGerald, J. Hirsh, and G. Roth
Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Chest,
September 1, 2004;
126(3_suppl):
234S - 264S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Patrono, F. Bachmann, C. Baigent, C. Bode, R. De Caterina, B. Charbonnier, D. Fitzgerald, J. Hirsh, S. Husted, J. Kvasnicka, et al.
Expert Consensus Document on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents: The Task Force on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J.,
January 2, 2004;
25(2):
166 - 181.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|