Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:911-919
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, W.

CLINICAL STUDY: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome

Yasuko Tanabe, MD*, Masashi Inagaki, MD{dagger}, Takashi Kurita, MD*, Noritoshi Nagaya, MD*, Atsushi Taguchi, MD*, Kazuhiro Suyama, MD, PhD*, Naohiko Aihara, MD*, Shiro Kamakura, MD, PhD*, Kenji Sunagawa, MD, PhD{dagger}, Kazufumi Nakamura, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Tohru Ohe, MD, PhD, FACC{ddagger}, Jeffrey A. Towbin, MD§, Silvia G. Priori, MD, PhD|| and Wataru Shimizu, MD, PhD*

* Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
{dagger} Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
{ddagger} Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan
§ Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
|| Molecular Cardiology, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Pavia, Italy

Manuscript received June 14, 2000; revised manuscript received October 24, 2000, accepted November 29, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Wataru Shimizu, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565 Japan
wshimizu{at}hsp.ncvc.go.jp

OBJECTIVES

The study compared the influence of sympathetic stimulation on transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization between LQT1 and LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS).

BACKGROUND

Cardiac events are more associated with sympathetic stimulation in LQT1 than in LQT2 or LQT3 syndrome. Experimental studies have suggested that the interval between Tpeak and Tend (Tp-e) in the electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization across the ventricular wall.

METHODS

We recorded 87-lead body-surface ECGs before and after epinephrine infusion (0.1 µg/kg/min) in 13 LQT1, 6 LQT2, and 7 control patients. The Q-Tend (QT-e), Q-Tpeak (QT-p), and Tp-e were measured automatically from 87-lead ECGs, corrected by Bazett’s method (QTc-e, QTc-p, Tcp-e), and averaged among all 87-leads and among 24-leads, which reflect the potential from the left ventricular free wall. As an index of spatial dispersion of repolarization, the dispersion of QTc-e (QTc-eD) and QTc-p (QTc-pD) were obtained among 87-leads and among 24-leads, and were defined as the interval between the maximum and the minimum of the QTc-e and the QTc-p, respectively.

RESULTS

Epinephrine significantly increased the mean QTc-e but not the mean QTc-p, resulting in a significant increase in the mean Tcp-e in both LQT1 and LQT2, but not in control patients. The epinephrine-induced increases in the mean QTc-e and Tcp-e were larger in LQT1 than in LQT2, and were more pronounced when the averaged data were obtained from 24-leads than from 87-leads. Epinephrine increased the maximum QTc-e but not the minimum QTc-e, producing a significant increase in the QTc-eD in both LQT1 and LQT2 patients, but not in control patients. The increase in the QTc-eD was larger in LQT1 than in LQT2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than in LQT2 syndrome, and this may explain why LQT1 patients are more sensitive to sympathetic stimulation.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  APD = action potential duration
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  LQTS = long QT syndrome
  QTc-e = corrected Q-Tend interval
  QTc-p = corrected Q-Tpeak interval
  QTc-eD = dispersion of QTc-e
  QTc-pD = dispersion of QTc-p
  QT-e = Q-Tend interval
  Tcp-e = corrected interval between Tpeak and Tend
  TdP = torsade de pointes
  TDR = transmural dispersion of repolarization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. V. Hume-Smith, S. Sanatani, J. Lim, A. Chau, and S. D. Whyte
The Effect of Propofol Concentration on Dispersion of Myocardial Repolarization in Children
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 806 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. J. Gallacher, A. Van de Water, H. van der Linde, A. N. Hermans, H. R. Lu, R. Towart, and P. G.A. Volders
In vivo mechanisms precipitating torsades de pointes in a canine model of drug-induced long-QT1 syndrome
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2007; 76(2): 247 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Antzelevitch
Role of spatial dispersion of repolarization in inherited and acquired sudden cardiac death syndromes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2024 - H2038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Antzelevitch
Ionic, molecular, and cellular bases of QT-interval prolongation and torsade de pointes
Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(suppl_4): iv4 - iv15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. D. Whyte, S. Sanatani, J. Lim, and P. D. Booker
A Comparison of the Effect on Dispersion of Repolarization of Age-Adjusted MAC Values of Sevoflurane in Children
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 277 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Viitasalo, L. Oikarinen, H. Swan, H. Vaananen, J. Jarvenpaa, H. Hietanen, J. Karjalainen, and L. Toivonen
Effects of Beta-Blocker Therapy on Ventricular Repolarization Documented by 24-h Electrocardiography in Patients With Type 1 Long-QT Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 747 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. M. Fish, J. Brugada, and C. Antzelevitch
Potential Proarrhythmic Effects of Biventricular Pacing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 20, 2005; 46(12): 2340 - 2347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W. Shimizu
The long QT syndrome: Therapeutic implications of a genetic diagnosis
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2005; 67(3): 347 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Antzelevitch
Cardiac repolarization. The long and short of it
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S3 - S9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
B. F. McBride and C. M. White
Critical Differences Among Beta-Adrenoreceptor Antagonists in Myocardial Failure: Debating the MERIT of COMET
J. Clin. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 45(1): 6 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. D. Whyte, P. D. Booker, and D. G. Buckley
The Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on the QT Interval and Transmural Dispersion of Repolarization in Children
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. D. Booker, S. D. Whyte, and E. J. Ladusans
Long QT syndrome and anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 349 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Takenaka, T. Ai, W. Shimizu, A. Kobori, T. Ninomiya, H. Otani, T. Kubota, H. Takaki, S. Kamakura, and M. Horie
Exercise Stress Test Amplifies Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in the LQT1 and LQT2 Forms of the Long-QT Syndrome
Circulation, February 18, 2003; 107(6): 838 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Viitasalo, L. Oikarinen, H. Swan, H. Vaananen, K. Glatter, P. J. Laitinen, K. Kontula, H. V. Barron, L. Toivonen, and M. M. Scheinman
Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Evidence of Transmural Dispersion of Repolarization in Patients With Long-QT Syndrome Type 1 and 2
Circulation, November 5, 2002; 106(19): 2473 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Antzelevitch
Sympathetic modulation of the long QT syndrome
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2002; 23(16): 1246 - 1252.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. Shimizu, Y. Tanabe, T. Aiba, M. Inagaki, T. Kurita, K. Suyama, N. Nagaya, A. Taguchi, N. Aihara, K. Sunagawa, et al.
Differential effects of beta-blockade on dispersion of repolarization in the absence and presence of sympathetic stimulation between the lqt1 and lqt2 forms of congenital long qt syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1984 - 1991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement