CLINICAL STUDY: BYPASS SURGERY
Early mortality and morbidity of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery revascularization: propensity and risk modeling
John P. A. Ioannidis, MD* ,
Othon Galanos, MD ,
Demosthenes Katritsis, MD, PhD, FACC||,
Cliff P. Connery, MD ,
George E. Drossos, MD ,
Daniel G. Swistel, MD and
Constantine E. Anagnostopoulos, MD
* Division of Clinical Care Research, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. LukesRoosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
|| Department of Cardiology, St. Thomass Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Manuscript received April 27, 2000;
revised manuscript received August 24, 2000,
accepted October 4, 2000.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Constantine E. Anagnostopoulos, Professor of Surgery and Senior Attending, Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. LukesRoosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1111 Amsterdam Ave., New York, New York 10025 cea8{at}columbia.edu
OBJECTIVES
We examined whether bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) revascularization is associated with any increased in-hospital mortality and complications compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) revascularization.
BACKGROUND
Despite proven long-term benefits, BITA revascularization has been slow to be adopted because of fear of increased early morbidity.
METHODS
We evaluated 1,697 consecutive patients undergoing BITA (n = 867) or SITA (n = 830) revascularization. We used propensity score analyses and adjusted risk models to address differences between arms.
RESULTS
There were 20 (2.3%) deaths in the BITA group versus 26 (3.1%) in the SITA group (odds ratio 0.73, p = 0.30). Propensity analysis identified several parameters that affected the decision to use BITA. Adjusting for propensity score and all potential risk factors, the odds ratio for death with BITA versus SITA was practically 1. Bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization did not increase the number of in-hospital complications with the possible exception of deep sternal wound infections (11 [1.3%] vs. 3 [0.4%], p = 0.057). In multivariate modeling BITA increased the risk of deep sternal wound infections only in emergent cases and in older patients; the excess risk was negligible among 1,206 patients (71.1% of total) who did not have emergent revascularization and were 70 years old (risk difference 0.3%, p = 0.74). There was no difference in length of stay after adjustment for propensity factors (mean 11.3 vs. 11.7 days, p = 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS
Bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization grafting confers no increased risk for early death and does not prolong hospital stay. The small increase in the risk of deep sternal wound infections does not affect the majority of patients.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BITA | = bilateral internal thoracic artery | | CABG | = coronary artery bypass graft | | CI | = confidence interval | | IABP | = intraaortic balloon pump | | MI | = myocardial infarction | | LVAD | = left ventricular assist device | | OR | = odds ratio | | PTCA | = percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography | | PVD | = peripheral vascular disease | | SITA | = single internal thoracic artery |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. K. Toumpoulis, N. Theakos, and J. Dunning
Does bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest increase the risk of mediastinitis?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
December 1, 2007;
6(6):
787 - 791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. K. Toumpoulis, C. E. Anagnostopoulos, S. Balaram, D. G. Swistel, R. C. Ashton Jr, and J. J. DeRose Jr
Does Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Increase Long-Term Survival of Diabetic Patients?
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
February 1, 2006;
81(2):
599 - 607.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. DeRose Jr, I. K. Toumpoulis, S. K. Balaram, J. P. Ioannidis, S. Belsley, R. C. Ashton Jr, D. G. Swistel, and C. E. Anagnostopoulos
Preoperative prediction of long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
February 1, 2005;
129(2):
314 - 321.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. K. Toumpoulis, C. E. Anagnostopoulos, J. J. DeRose Jr, and D. G. Swistel
The Impact of Deep Sternal Wound Infection on Long-term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Chest,
February 1, 2005;
127(2):
464 - 471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D P Taggart
Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: are BIMA better?
Heart,
July 1, 2002;
88(1):
7 - 9.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Prapas, C. E. Anagnostopoulos, V. N. Kotsis, G. P. Stavropoulos, A. V. Sidiropoulos, O. G. Ananiadou, and G. M. Palatianos
A new pattern for using both thoracic arteries to revascularize the entire heart: the {pi}-graft
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
June 1, 2002;
73(6):
1990 - 1992.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|