JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:19-25
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, L. F.

CLINICAL STUDY: MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Non–Q-wave myocardial infarction following thrombolytic therapy: a comparison of outcomes in patients randomized to invasive or conservative post-infarct assessment strategies in the Veterans Affairs Non–Q-Wave Infarction Strategies In-Hospital (VANQWISH) trial

Laura F. Wexler, MD, FACC*, Alvin S. Blaustein, MD{dagger}, Philip W. Lavori, PhD{ddagger}, Kenneth G. Lehmann, MD§, Michael Wade, MS||, William E. Boden, MD|| ** for the Veterans Affairs Non–Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators

* Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
{dagger} Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
{ddagger} Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
§ Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
|| State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse, New York, USA
** Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA

Manuscript received January 19, 2000; revised manuscript received July 24, 2000, accepted September 13, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Laura F. Wexler, Cardiology Section, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3200 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220
Wexlerl{at}ucmail.uc.edu

OBJECTIVES

We wished to determine the effect of post-infarct management strategy on event rates (death or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI]) in patients who evolved non–Q-wave MI (NQMI) following thrombolytic therapy.

BACKGROUND

Patients who evolve NQMI following thrombolytic therapy are often considered to be at high risk and are frequently managed with routine early invasive testing despite a lack of data supporting improved outcome.

METHODS

The Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies In-Hospital (VANQWISH) study included 115 patients who evolved NQMI following thrombolytic therapy. We compared the event rates in patients randomized to routine early coronary angiography with those in patients randomized to a conservative strategy of noninvasive functional assessment, with angiography reserved for patients with spontaneous or induced ischemia.

RESULTS

During an average follow-up of 23 months, 19 of 58 patients (33%) randomized to the invasive management strategy died or suffered recurrent nonfatal MI, compared with 11 of 57 patients (19%) randomized to the conservative strategy (p = 0.152). Equivalent numbers of patients were subjected to revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft). There were more deaths in the invasive management group than in the conservative management group (11 vs. 2). Excess deaths could not be attributed to periprocedural mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall event rates (death or recurrent nonfatal MI) are comparable with conservative and invasive strategies in patients who evolve NQMI following thrombolytic therapy. Mortality rate in patients managed conservatively is low (3.5%), and routine invasive management may be associated with an increased risk of death.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CABG = coronary artery bypass graft
  CON = conservative management strategy
  INV = invasive management strategy
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  MI = myocardial infarction
  NQMI = non-Q wave myocardial infarction
  PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
  TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
  VANQWISH = Veterans Affairs Non–Q-Wave Infarction Strategy In-Hospital




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. A. Lin, R. A. Dudley, and R. F. Redberg
Cardiologists' Use of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Arch Intern Med, August 13, 2007; 167(15): 1604 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Yang, M. Pu, D. Rodriguez, D. Underwood, B. P. Griffin, V. Kalahasti, J. D. Thomas, and R. C. Brunken
Ischemic and viable myocardium in patients with Non-Q-Wave or Q-Wave myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction: A clinical study using positron emission tomography, echocardiography, and electrocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 592 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
PCI Not Mandatory if Fibrinolysis Is Successful
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 2, 2001; 2001(402): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Conservative Management for Post-Thrombolytic Non-Q-Wave MI
Journal Watch Cardiology, March 16, 2001; 2001(316): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Is Non-Q-Wave MI After Thrombolytic Therapy an Indication for Angiography?
Journal Watch (General), February 9, 2001; 2001(209): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.