|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:2174-2184 © 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
* The Duke Outcomes Research and Assessment Group, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
The Alabama Quality Assurance Foundation, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
The Iowa Foundation for Medical Care, West Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Manuscript received July 26, 1999; revised manuscript received June 1, 2000, accepted July 14, 2000.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Eric D. Peterson, Box 3236, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
OBJECTIVES
We sought to evaluate the predictive accuracy of four bypass surgery mortality clinical risk models and to examine the extent to which hospitals’ risk-adjusted surgical outcomes vary depending on which risk-adjustment method is applied.
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular "report cards" often compare risk-adjusted surgical outcomes; however, it is unclear to what extent the risk-adjustment process itself may affect these metrics.
METHODS
As part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project’s Pilot Revascularization Study, we compared the predictive accuracy of four bypass clinical risk models among 3,654 Medicare patients undergoing surgery at 28 hospitals in Alabama and Iowa. We also compared the agreement in hospital-level risk-adjusted bypass outcome performance ratings depending on which of the four risk models was applied.
RESULTS
Although the four risk models had similar discriminatory abilities (C-index, 0.71 to 0.74), certain models tended to overpredict mortality in higher-risk patients. There was high correlation between a hospital’s risk-adjusted mortality rates regardless of which of the four models was used (correlation between risk-adjusted rating, 0.93 to 0.97). In contrast, there was limited agreement in which hospitals were identified as "performance outliers" depending on which risk-adjustment model was used and how outlier status was defined.
CONCLUSIONS
A hospital’s risk-adjusted bypass surgery mortality rating, relative to its peers, was consistent regardless of the risk-adjustment model applied, supporting their use as a means of provider performance feedback. Designation of performance outliers, however, can vary significantly depending on the benchmark and methods used for this determination.
| ||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Schneeweiss, J. D. Seeger, J. Landon, and A. M. Walker Aprotinin during Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting and Risk of Death N. Engl. J. Med., February 21, 2008; 358(8): 771 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. D'Alessandro, P. Leprince, J. L. Golmard, A. Ouattara, S. Aubert, A. Pavie, I. Gandjbakhch, and N. Bonnet Strict glycemic control reduces EuroSCORE expected mortality in diabetic patients undergoing myocardial revascularization J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 29 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Jin and G. L. Grunkemeier Does the logistic EuroSCORE offer an advantage over the additive model? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2006; 5(1): 15 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Shahian, D. F. Torchiana, R. J. Shemin, J. D. Rawn, and S.-L. T. Normand Massachusetts Cardiac Surgery Report Card: Implications of Statistical Methodology Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2106 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. L. Grunkemeier and A. P. Furnary Mandatory Database Participation: Risky Business? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 799 - 801. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Jin, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. Starr, and Providence Health System Cardiovascular Study Grou Validation and Refinement of Mortality Risk Models for Heart Valve Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 471 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I-C. Huang, F. Dominici, C. Frangakis, G. B. Diette, C. L. Damberg, and A. W. Wu Is Risk-Adjustor Selection More Important Than Statistical Approach for Provider Profiling? Asthma as an Example Med Decis Making, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 20 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. M. Rothenberg, T. Pearson, J. Zwanziger, and D. Mukamel Explaining disparities in access to high-quality cardiac surgeons Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. L. Krupp, G. Weinstein, A. Chalian, J. A. Berlin, P. Wolf, and R. S. Weber Validation of a Transfusion Prediction Model in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, December 1, 2003; 129(12): 1297 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Spertus, M. J. Radford, N. R. Every, E. F. Ellerbeck, E. D. Peterson, and H. M. Krumholz Challenges and opportunities in quantifying the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: Summary from the acute myocardial infarction working group of the American heart association/American college of cardiology first scientific forum on quality of care and outcomes research in cardiovascular disease and stroke J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1653 - 1663. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Agabiti, C. Ancona, F. Forastiere, M. Arca, and C. A. Perucci Evaluating outcomes of hospital care following coronary artery bypass surgery in Rome, Italy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 599 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Spertus, M. J. Radford, N. R. Every, E. F. Ellerbeck, E. D. Peterson, and H. M. Krumholz Challenges and Opportunities in Quantifying the Quality of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Summary From the Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Circulation, April 1, 2003; 107(12): 1681 - 1691. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. B. Ferguson Jr, L. P. Coombs, E. D. Peterson, and for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adul Preoperative {beta}-Blocker Use and Mortality and Morbidity Following CABG Surgery in North America JAMA, May 1, 2002; 287(17): 2221 - 2227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. E. Shaw, H. V. Anderson, R. G. Brindis, R. J. Krone, L. W. Klein, C. R. McKay, P. C. Block, L. J. Shaw, K. Hewitt, W. S. Weintraub, et al. Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) experience: 1998-2000 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2002; 39(7): 1104 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. B. Ferguson Jr, B. G. Hammill, E. D. Peterson, E. R. DeLong, and F. L. Grover A decade of change--risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 480 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Shahian, S.-L. Normand, D. F. Torchiana, S. M. Lewis, J. O. Pastore, R. E. Kuntz, and P. I. Dreyer Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2155 - 2168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
