JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1967-1971
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H.

VIEWPOINT

First line drugs in chronic stable effort angina—the case for newer, longer-acting calcium channel blocking agents

Lionel H. Opie, MD, DPhil, DSc, FACC, FRCPa

a Heart Research Unit and Hatter Institute, MRC Inter-University Cape Heart Research Group, Cape Heart Center, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Manuscript received December 20, 1999; revised manuscript received May 8, 2000, accepted July 10, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. L. H. Opie, Cape Heart Centre, University of Cape Town Medical School, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
opie{at}capeheart.uct.ac.za

The American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association Committee recommends first line beta-adrenergic blocking agents for chronic stable effort angina. This article reassesses some critical evidence that is new or could have been neglected by the Committee. In particular, the putative role of calcium channel blocking agents (CCBs) is reexamined. Additional evidence is culled from articles not cited by the Committee, together with added reference to recent trials. Safety, side-effects and tolerability are issues that are evaluated. Mortality data are reviewed with the aid of a meta-analysis of all placebo-controlled trials on long acting CCBs. The advice of the committee may need to be reconsidered in view of recent evidence on the tolerability and benefits in hypertension of newer, longer-acting, second-generation CCBs. Of the older agents, verapamil has been shown to be the best with regard to safety and efficacy. Especially in the elderly, angina is often associated with hypertension, with evidence showing dihydropyridine CCBs and beta-adrenergic blocking agents to be similarly effective. Beta-blockers may have undesirable side effects such impotence and impaired exercise ability, despite their proven protective effects in postinfarct patients and in heart failure. The choice of drug should be keyed to the needs and the pathophysiology of the individual patient.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACC = American College of Cardiology
  ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme
  AHA = American Heart Association
  CAPARES = Coronary AngioPlasty Amlodipine REStenosis Study
  CCB = calcium channel blocking agent
  CHD = coronary heart disease
  DAVIT = DAnish Verapamil Infarct Trial
  DHP = dihydropyridine
  PRAISE = Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation
  PREVENT = Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial
  STOP = Swedish Trial in Old Patients




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Opie
Anti-ischemic properties of calcium-channel blockers: Lessons from cardiac surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1506 - 1509.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.