CLINICAL STUDY
Nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent, carvedilol, improves arterial baroflex gain and heart rate variability in patients with stable chronic heart failure
Andrea Mortara, MDa,
Maria Teresa La Rovere, MDa,
Gian Domenico Pinna, BEa,
Roberto Maestri, MD, BEa,
Soccorso Capomolla, MDa and
Franco Cobelli, MDa
a Department of Cardiology, Centro Medico di Montescano, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
Manuscript received July 29, 1999;
revised manuscript received April 10, 2000,
accepted June 15, 2000.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Andrea Mortara, Division of Cardiology, Centro Medico di Montescano, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Montescano, Pavia, Italy amortara{at}fsm.it
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to investigate in a case-controlled study whether carvedilol increased baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability (HRV).
BACKGROUND
In chronic heart failure (CHF), beta-adrenergic blockade improves symptoms and ventricular function and may favorably affect prognosis. Although beta-blockade therapy is supposed to decrease myocardial adrenergic activity, data on restoration of autonomic balance to the heart and, particularly, on vagal reflexes are limited.
METHODS
Nineteen consecutive patients with moderate, stable CHF (age 54 ± 7 years, New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II to III, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 24 ± 6%), treated with optimized conventional medical therapy, received carvedilol treatment. Controls with CHF were selected from our database on the basis of the following matching criteria: age ± 3 years, same NYHA class, LVEF ± 3%, pulmonary wedge pressure ± 3 mm Hg, peak volume of oxygen ± 3 ml/kg/min, same therapy. All patients underwent analysis of baroreflex sensitivity (phenylephrine method) and of HRV (24-h Holter recording) at baseline and after six months.
RESULTS
Beta-blockade therapy was associated with a significant improvement in symptoms (NYHA class 2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.01), systolic and diastolic function (LVEF 23 ± 7 vs. 28 ± 9%, p < 0.01; pulmonary wedge pressure 17 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 7 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and mitral regurgitation area (7.0 ± 5.1 vs. 3.6 ± 3.0 cm2, p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in either clinical or hemodynamic indexes in control patients. Phenylephrine method increased significantly after carvedilol (from 3.7 ± 3.4 to 7.1 ± 4.9 ms/mm Hg, p < 0.01) as well as RR interval (from 791 ± 113 to 894 ± 110 ms, p < 0.001), 24-h standard deviation of normal RR interval and root mean square of successive differences (from 56 ± 17 to 80 ± 28 ms and from 12 ± 7 to 18 ± 9 ms, all p < 0.05), while all parameters remained unmodified in controls. During a mean follow-up of 19 ± 8 months a reduced number of cardiac events (death plus heart transplantation, 58% vs. 31%) occurred in those patients receiving beta-blockade.
CONCLUSIONS
Besides the well-known effects on ventricular function, treatment with carvedilol in CHF restores both autonomic balance and the ability to increase reflex vagal activity. This protective mechanism may contribute to the beneficial effect of beta-blockade treatment on prognosis in CHF.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ANOVA | = analysis of variance | | BRS | = baroreflex sensitivity | | CHF | = chronic heart failure | | HRV | = heart rate variability | | LVEF | = left ventricular ejection fraction | | NYHA | = New York Heart Association | | rMSSD | = root mean square of successive differences | | SAP | = systolic arterial pressure | | SDNN | = 24-h standard deviation of normal RR interval |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Braunschweig, C. Linde, P. B. Adamson, A. Magalski, E. Erdmann, B. Kjellstrom, and T. Bennett
Continuous central haemodynamic measurements during the six-minute walk test and daily life in patients with chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail,
June 1, 2009;
11(6):
594 - 601.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. La Rovere, G. D. Pinna, R. Maestri, E. Robbi, A. Caporotondi, G. Guazzotti, P. Sleight, and O. Febo
Prognostic implications of baroreflex sensitivity in heart failure patients in the beta-blocking era.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 13, 2009;
53(2):
193 - 199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Fantoni, S. Raffa, F. Regoli, F. Giraldi, M. T. La Rovere, J. Prentice, F. Pastori, S. Fratini, J. A. Salerno-Uriarte, H. U. Klein, et al.
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Heart Rate Profile and Heart Rate Variability of Patients With Moderate to Severe Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 15, 2005;
46(10):
1875 - 1882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Pinna, R. Maestri, S. Capomolla, O. Febo, E. Robbi, F. Cobelli, and M. T. La Rovere
Applicability and Clinical Relevance of the Transfer Function Method in the Assessment of Baroreflex Sensitivity in Heart Failure Patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 4, 2005;
46(7):
1314 - 1321.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Y K Wong, S McSwiggan, N S J Kennedy, S Y S Wong, A Gavin, R S MacWalter, and A D Struthers
Spectrum of cardiac abnormalities associated with long QT in stroke survivors
Heart,
October 1, 2005;
91(10):
1306 - 1310.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. F. McBride and C. M. White
Critical Differences Among Beta-Adrenoreceptor Antagonists in Myocardial Failure: Debating the MERIT of COMET
J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
January 1, 2005;
45(1):
6 - 24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Hamlin, P. S. Villars, J. T. Kanusky, and A. D. Shaw
Role of Diastole in Left Ventricular Function, II: Diagnosis and Treatment
Am. J. Crit. Care.,
November 1, 2004;
13(6):
453 - 466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kurata, A. Uehara, and A. Ishikawa
Improvement of Cardiac Sympathetic Innervation by Renal Transplantation
J. Nucl. Med.,
July 1, 2004;
45(7):
1114 - 1120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. La Rovere, G. D. Pinna, R. Maestri, A. Mortara, S. Capomolla, O. Febo, R. Ferrari, M. Franchini, M. Gnemmi, C. Opasich, et al.
Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Strongly Predicts Sudden Cardiac Death in Chronic Heart Failure Patients
Circulation,
February 4, 2003;
107(4):
565 - 570.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Vittorio, C. C. Lang, S. D. Katz, M. Packer, D. M. Mancini, and U. P. Jorde
Vasopressor Response to Angiotensin II Infusion in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Receiving {beta}-Blockers
Circulation,
January 21, 2003;
107(2):
290 - 293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. H. Makikallio, H. V. Huikuri, M. T. La Rovere, G. D. Pinna, S. H. Hohnloser, F. I. Marcus, A. Mortara, R. Nohara, J. T. Bigger Jr, A. J. Camm, et al.
Risks in Risk Stratification: What Is Relevant in Practice? * Response
Circulation,
March 26, 2002;
105
(12):
e69 - e70.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Malfatto, G. Branzi, B. Riva, L. Sala, G. Leonetti, and M. Facchini
Recovery of cardiac autonomic responsiveness with low-intensity physical training in patients with chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail,
March 1, 2002;
4(2):
159 - 166.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|