Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1536-1541
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabaté, M.

CLINICAL STUDY

Methodological and clinical implications of the relocation of the minimal luminal diameter after intracoronary radiation therapy

Manel Sabaté, MD*, Marco A. Costa, MD*, Ken Kozuma, MD*, I. Patrick Kay, MBChB*, Connie J. van der Wiel, MSc{dagger}, Vitali Verin, MD, PhD{ddagger}, William Wijns, MD, PhD§, Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FESC, FACC* on behalf of the Dose Finding Study Group

* Thoraxcenter, Academisch Ziekenhuis Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
{dagger} Cardialysis B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands
{ddagger} University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
§ O.L.V. Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Aalst, Belgium

Manuscript received January 21, 2000; revised manuscript received April 24, 2000, accepted June 21, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. P.W. Serruys, Heart Center, Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam, Erasmus University, Building 408, Box 2040, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
serruys{at}card.azr.nl

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to determine the incidence of relocation of the minimal luminal diameter (MLD) after beta-radiation therapy following balloon angioplasty (BA) and to describe a new methodological approach to define the effect of brachytherapy on treated coronary stenoses.

BACKGROUND

Luminal diameter of coronary lesions may increase over time following angioplasty and irradiatation. As a result, the MLD at follow-up may be relocated from its location preintervention, which may induce misleading results when a restricted definition of the target segment by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is performed.

METHODS

Patients treated with BA followed by intracoronary brachytherapy according to the Dose-Finding Study constituted the study population. A historical cohort of patients treated with BA was used as control group. To be included in the analysis, an accurate angiographic documentation of all instrumentations during the procedure was mandatory. In the irradiated patients, four regions were defined by QCA: vessel segment (VS), target segment (TS), injured segment (INS), and irradiated segment (IRS).

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients from the Dose-Finding Study and 179 control patients were included. At follow-up, MLD was relocated more often in the radiation group (78.5% vs. 26.3%; p < 0.0001). The rate of >50% diameter stenosis differed among the four predefined regions: 3.1% in the TS; 7.7% in the INS; 9.2% in the IRS and 13.8% in the VS.

CONCLUSIONS

Relocation of the MLD is commonly demonstrated after BA and brachytherapy, and it should be taken into account during the analysis of the results of radiation clinical trials.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BA = balloon angioplasty
  Gy = gray
  INS = injured segment
  IRS = irradiated segment
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  MLD = minimal luminal diameter
  QCA = quantitative coronary angiography
  TS = target segment
  VS = vessel segment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Futamatsu, M. Sabate, D. J. Angiolillo, P. Jimenez-Quevedo, C. Corros, K. Morikawa-Futamatsu, F. Alfonso, J. Jiang, P. Cervinka, R. Hernandez-Antolin, et al.
Characterization of Plaque Prolapse After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Diabetic Patients: A Three-Dimensional Volumetric Intravascular Ultrasound Outcome Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 19, 2006; 48(6): 1139 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Costa and D. I. Simon
Molecular Basis of Restenosis and Drug-Eluting Stents
Circulation, May 3, 2005; 111(17): 2257 - 2273.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. Alfonso, R. Melgares, V. Mainar, R. Lezaun, N. Vazquez, J. Tascon, F. Pomar, A. Cequier, J. Angel, M.-J. Perez-Vizcayno, et al.
Therapeutic implications of in-stent Restenosis located at the stent edge.: Insights from the Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized trial
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2004; 25(20): 1829 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Sabate, G. Pimentel, C. Prieto, J. Corral, C. Banuelos, D. J. Angiolillo, F. Alfonso, R. Hernandez-Antolin, J. Escaned, P. Fantidis, et al.
Intracoronary brachytherapy after stenting de novo lesions in diabetic patients: Results of a randomized intravascular ultrasound study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 520 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. W. Serruys, W. Wijns, G. Sianos, I. de Scheerder, P. A. van den Heuvel, W. Rutsch, H. D. Glogar, C. Macaya, P. H. Materne, S. Veldhof, et al.
Direct stenting versus direct stenting followed by centered beta-radiation with intravascular ultrasound-guided dosimetry and long-term anti-platelet treatment: Results of a randomized trial: Beta-radiation Investigation with Direct stenting and Galileo in Europe (BRIDGE)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 528 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Alfonso, J. Zueco, A. Cequier, R. Mantilla, A. Bethencourt, J. R. Lopez-Minguez, J. Angel, J. M. Auge, M. Gomez-Recio, C. Moris, et al.
A randomized comparison ofrepeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 3, 2003; 42(5): 796 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.W. Serruys, G. Sianos, W. van der Giessen, H.J.R.M. Bonnier, P. Urban, W. Wijns, E. Benit, M. Vandormael, R. Dorr, C. Disco, et al.
Intracoronary {beta}-radiation to reduce restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting. The Beta Radiation In Europe (BRIE) study
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2002; 23(17): 1351 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Lansky, G. Dangas, R. Mehran, K. J. Desai, G. S. Mintz, H. Wu, M. Fahy, G. W. Stone, R. Waksman, and M. B. Leon
Quantitative angiographic methods for appropriate end-point analysis, edge-effect evaluation, and prediction of recurrent restenosis after coronary brachytherapy with gamma irradiation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 274 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Parikh, D. Nori, P. Tripuraneni, M. Sabate, M. A. Costa, K. Kozuma, I. P. Kay, W. J. van der Giessen, V. L.M.A. Coen, J. M.R. Ligthart, et al.
Geographic Miss: A Cause of Treatment Failure in Radio-Oncology Applied to Intracoronary Radiation Therapy Response
Circulation, March 27, 2001; 103 (12): e65 - e66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
V. Verin, Y. Popowski, B. de Bruyne, D. Baumgart, W. Sauerwein, M. Lins, G. Kovacs, M. Thomas, F. Calman, C. Disco, et al.
Endoluminal Beta-Radiation Therapy for the Prevention of Coronary Restenosis after Balloon Angioplasty
N. Engl. J. Med., January 25, 2001; 344(4): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement