CLINICAL STUDY: CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
A common variant of the AMPD1 gene predicts improved cardiovascular survival in patients with coronary artery disease
Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACCa,
Jessica Habashi, BSa,
John F. Carlquist, PhDa,
Joseph B. Muhlestein, MD, FACCa,
Benjamin D. Horne, MPHa,
Tami L. Bair, BSa,
Robert R. Pearson, BSa and
Noal Hart, BSa
a University of Utah, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Manuscript received December 29, 1999;
revised manuscript received April 3, 2000,
accepted June 2, 2000.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jeffrey L. Anderson, University of Utah School of Medicine (4A154), Department of Medicine/Division of Cardiology, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132
OBJECTIVE
We tested whether a common AMPD1 gene variant is associated with improved cardiovascular (CV) survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND
Reduced activity of adenosine monophosphate deaminase (AMPD) may increase production of adenosine, a cardioprotective agent. A common, nonsense, point variant of the AMPD1 gene (C34T) results in enzymatic inactivity and has been associated with prolonged survival in heart failure.
METHODS
Blood was collected from 367 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Genotyping was done by polymerase chain reaction amplification and restriction enzyme digestion, resulting in allele-specific fragments. Coronary artery disease was defined as 70% stenosis of 1 coronary artery. Patients were followed prospectively for up to 4.8 years. Survival statistics compared hetero- (+/) or homozygotic (/) carriers with noncarriers.
RESULTS
Patients were 66 ± 10 years old; 79% were men; 22.6% were heterozygous and 1.9% homozygous for the variant AMPD1() allele. During a mean of 3.5 ± 1.0 years, 52 patients (14.2%) died, 37 (10.1%) of CV causes. Cardiovascular mortality was 4.4% (4/90) in AMPD1() allele carriers compared with 11.9% (33/277) in noncarriers (p = 0.046). In multiple variable regression analysis, only age (hazard ratio, 1.11/year, p < 0.001) and AMPD1() carriage (hazard ratio, 0.36, p = 0.053) were independent predictors of CV mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
Carriage of a common variant of the AMPD1 gene was associated with improved CV survival in patients with angiographically documented CAD. The dysfunctional AMPD1() allele may lead to increased cardiac adenosine and increased cardioprotection during ischemic events. Adenosine monophosphate deaminase-1 genotyping should be further explored in CAD for prognostic, mechanistic and therapeutic insights.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AMISTAD | = Acute Myocardial Infarction Study of Adenosine | | AMPD | = adenosine monophosphate deaminase | | CAD | = coronary artery disease | | CV | = cardiovascular | | HR | = hazard ratio | | MI | = myocardial infarction |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P. Riksen, B. Franke, W. J.G. Oyen, G. F. Borm, P. van den Broek, O. C. Boerman, P. Smits, and G. A. Rongen
Augmented hyperaemia and reduced tissue injury in response to ischaemia in subjects with the 34C > T variant of the AMPD1 gene
Eur. Heart J.,
May 1, 2007;
28(9):
1085 - 1091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Toyama, H Morisaki, Y Kitamura, M Gross, T Tamura, Y Nakahori, J M Vance, M Speer, N Kamatani, and T Morisaki
Haplotype analysis of human AMPD1 gene: origin of common mutant allele
J. Med. Genet.,
June 1, 2004;
41(6):
e74 - e74.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. K Kalsi, A. H.Y Yuen, I. M Rybakowska, P. H Johnson, E. Slominska, E. J Birks, K. Kaletha, M. H Yacoub, and R. T Smolenski
Decreased cardiac activity of AMP deaminase in subjects with the AMPD1 mutation--A potential mechanism of protection in heart failure
Cardiovasc Res,
September 1, 2003;
59(3):
678 - 684.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rico-Sanz, T. Rankinen, D. R. Joanisse, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard
Associations between cardiorespiratory responses to exercise and the C34T AMPD1 gene polymorphism in the HERITAGE Family study
Physiol Genomics,
July 7, 2003;
14(2):
161 - 166.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|