Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:69-74
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Köster, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Köster, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, C. W.

CLINICAL STUDIES: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Six-month clinical and angiographic outcome after successful excimer laser angioplasty for in-stent restenosis

Ralf Köster, MDa, Jan Kähler, MDa, Wolfram Terres, MDa, Jacobus Reimers, MDa, Stephan Baldus, MDa, Dirk Hartig, BSca, J.ürgen Berger, PhDa, Thomas Meinertz, MDa and Christian W. Hamm, MD, FACCa

a University Hospital Eppendorf, Medical Clinic, Department of Cardiology, Hamburg, Germany

Manuscript received October 26, 1999; revised manuscript received January 18, 2000, accepted March 24, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Prof. Dr. Thomas Meinertz, University Hospital Eppendorf, Medical Clinic, Dept. of Cardiology, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
meinertz{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the clinical and angiographic six-month follow-up after excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) for restenosed coronary stents.

BACKGROUND

Excimer laser coronary angioplasty has recently been shown to be safe and efficient for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

METHODS

Ninety-six consecutive patients successfully treated with ELCA within 141 stents were included in a six-month clinical and angiographic follow-up.

RESULTS

During follow-up there was one sudden death and one patient with documented myocardial infarction. Angina pectoris classified as ≥ Canadian Cardiovascular Society II reoccurred in 49 patients. Follow-up angiography was obtained in 89 patients (93%) with 133 stents. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed a mean diameter stenosis of 77 ± 10% before intervention, 41 ± 12% after laser treatment and 11% ± 12% after adjunctive percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (p < 0.001). Six months after ELCA the mean diameter stenosis had increased to 60 ± 26% (p < 0.001). A ≥50% diameter stenosis was present in 48 patients (54%); in 24 of these patients diameter stenosis was ≥70%. Total occlusions occurred in an additional 10 patients (11%). There was a trend toward an increased recurrent restenosis rate in patients with diabetes mellitus and long lesions or total occlusions (p = 0.059). Forty-eight patients (50%) received medical treatment after six months. Reinterventions were necessary in 30 patients (31%), and coronary artery bypass surgery was performed in 17 patients (18%). Event-free survival was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Excimer laser angioplasty for in-stent restenosis was associated with a high incidence of recurrent restenosis in this group of patients, suggesting that this technique is unlikely to reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis and that other approaches are necessary.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CCS = Canadian Cardiovascular Society
  ELCA = excimer laser coronary angioplasty
  MLD = minimal lumen diameter
  PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
  TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (trial)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. A. Batyraliev, I. V. Pershukov, Z. A. Niyazova-Karben, A. Karaus, O. Calenici, N. Guler, B. Eryonucu, A. Temamogullari, S. Ozgul, F. Akgul, et al.
Current Role of Laser Angioplasty of Restenotic Coronary Stents
Angiology, January 1, 2006; 57(1): 21 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.W Radke, A Kaiser, C Frost, and U Sigwart
Outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: Results from a systematic review using meta-analysis techniques
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2003; 24(3): 266 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Morino, T. Limpijankit, Y. Honda, A. J. Lansky, R. Waksman, H. N. Bonneau, P. G. Yock, G. S. Mintz, and P. J. Fitzgerald
Late Vascular Response to Repeat Stenting for In-Stent Restenosis With and Without Radiation: An Intravascular Ultrasound Volumetric Analysis
Circulation, May 28, 2002; 105(21): 2465 - 2468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. vom Dahl, U. Dietz, P. K. Haager, S. Silber, L. Niccoli, H. J. Buettner, F. Schiele, M. Thomas, P. Commeau, D. R. Ramsdale, et al.
Rotational Atherectomy Does Not Reduce Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis: Results of the Angioplasty Versus Rotational Atherectomy for Treatment of Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis Trial (ARTIST)
Circulation, February 5, 2002; 105(5): 583 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement