Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:44-50
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Regenfus, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moshage, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Regenfus, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moshage, W.

CLINICAL STUDIES: CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography

Matthias Regenfus, MD*, Dieter Ropers, MD*, Stephan Achenbach, MD*, Winfried Kessler, MD*, Gerhard Laub, PhD{dagger}, Werner G. Daniel, MD, FACC* and Werner Moshage, MD*

* Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
{dagger} Siemens Medical Engineering, Erlangen, Germany

Manuscript received May 6, 1999; revised manuscript received December 30, 1999, accepted February 28, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Matthias Regenfus, Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Östliche Stadtmauerstrasse 29, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
dres.regenfus{at}t-online.de

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) technique for detection of coronary artery stenoses.

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of previously published MR coronary angiography protocols varies widely. Recently, coronary artery imaging using T1-shortening contrast agent has become possible, but so far there are no data concerning its clinical application.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance coronary angiography was performed in 50 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Magnetic resonance data acquisition using an ultrafast 3D gradient-echo sequence lasted over 32 heartbeats within one single breath-hold. Twenty milliliters of gadopentetate dimeglumine was injected at a flow rate of 1 ml/s for two successive studies covering the main coronary arteries in single-oblique planes. Stenosis assessment by MR was compared with significant (diameter stenosis > 50%) stenoses on X-ray angiography. Evaluation was limited to the proximal and mid-coronary artery segments.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-eight of 350 artery segments (76.6%) could be evaluated. Left circumflex coronary artery was only evaluable in 50% of cases by MR. In the evaluable segments, 48 of 56 stenoses and 193 of 212 nonstenotic segments were correctly classified by MR. On a patient basis, MR correctly identified 34 of 36 patients with and 8 of 14 patients without significant coronary stenoses as demonstrated by X-ray angiography (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 57.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oblique projection contrast-enhanced MR coronary angiograms obtained within one single breath-hold permit identification of patients with coronary stenoses in the proximal and mid segments of the major coronary arteries with satisfactory accuracy.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  FLASH = fast low angle shot
  HASTE = half-fourier turbo spin echo
  LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery
  LCX = left circumflex coronary artery
  LM = left main coronary artery
  MR = magnetic resonance
  RCA = right coronary artery
  SNR = signal-to-noise ratio
  TE = echo time
  3D = three-dimensional
  TR = repetition time
  2D = two-dimensional




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
U. Hoffmann, A. J. Pena, R. C. Cury, S. Abbara, M. Ferencik, F. Moselewski, U. Siebert, T. J. Brady, and J. T. Nagurney
Cardiac CT in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Chest Pain.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 963 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, S. Achenbach, B. Schnackenburg, R. Gebker, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel
Coronary MR Imaging: Breath-hold Capability and Patterns, Coronary Artery Rest Periods, and {beta}-Blocker Use
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Plein, J. P. Greenwood, J. P. Ridgway, G. Cranny, S. G. Ball, and M. U. Sivananthan
Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 7, 2004; 44(11): 2173 - 2181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. G. Danias, A. Roussakis, and J. P.A. Ioannidis
Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional x-ray angiography: A meta-analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1867 - 1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. R. Edelman
Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Heart: Overview of the Literature
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 653 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, B. Schnackenburg, A. Bornstedt, R. Gebker, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel
Coronary MR Angiography with Steady-State Free Precession: Individually Adapted Breath-hold Technique versus Free-breathing Technique
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 669 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
S. Dhawan, K. C. Dharmashankar, and T. Tak
Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Visualizing Coronary Arteries
Clin. Med. Res., August 1, 2004; 2(3): 173 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Schoenhagen, S. S. Halliburton, A. E. Stillman, S. A. Kuzmiak, S. E. Nissen, E. M. Tuzcu, and R. D. White
Noninvasive Imaging of Coronary Arteries: Current and Future Role of Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 7 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, B. M. Ohnesorge, and E. K. Yucel
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 18 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, and A. Duerinckx
Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1867 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. Watanabe, T. Hiroki, and N. Koga
Relation of Thoracic Aorta Calcification on Computed Tomography and Coronary Risk Factors to Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease on Angiography
Angiology, July 1, 2003; 54(4): 433 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C R Peebles
Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?
Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 591 - 594.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Dirksen, H. J. Lamb, P. Kunz, P. Robert, C. Corot, and A. de Roos
Improved MR Coronary Angiography with Use of a New Rapid Clearance Blood Pool Contrast Agent in Pigs
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 802 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. A. Fayad, V. Fuster, K. Nikolaou, and C. Becker
Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Plaque Imaging: Current and Potential Future Concepts
Circulation, October 8, 2002; 106(15): 2026 - 2034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Plein, J. P. Ridgway, T. R. Jones, T. N. Bloomer, and M. U. Sivananthan
Coronary Artery Disease: Assessment with a Comprehensive MR Imaging Protocol—Initial Results
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 300 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. P. Choudhury, V. Fuster, J. J. Badimon, E. A. Fisher, and Z. A. Fayad
MRI and Characterization of Atherosclerotic Plaque: Emerging Applications and Molecular Imaging
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2002; 22(7): 1065 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
T. C. Gerber, R. S. Kuzo, N. Karstaedt, G. E. Lane, R. L. Morin, P. F Sheedy II, R. E. Safford, J. L. Blackshear, and J. H. Pietan
Current Results and New Developments of Coronary Angiography With Use of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography of the Heart
Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2002; 77(1): 55 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. Y. Kim, P. G. Danias, M. Stuber, S. D. Flamm, S. Plein, E. Nagel, S. E. Langerak, O. M. Weber, E. M. Pedersen, M. Schmidt, et al.
Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Stenoses
N. Engl. J. Med., December 27, 2001; 345(26): 1863 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Achenbach and W. G. Daniel
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography -- An Acceptable Alternative?
N. Engl. J. Med., December 27, 2001; 345(26): 1909 - 1910.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement