This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Song, J.-K. Articles by Park, S.-J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Song, J.-K. Articles by Park, S.-J.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Safety and clinical impact of ergonovine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary vasospasm

^a Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Manuscript received August 5, 1999; revised manuscript received December 30, 1999, accepted February 21, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jae-Kwan Song, Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-ku, Seoul, 138-040 Korea
jksong{at}www.amc.seoul.kr

OBJECTIVES

We sought to address the issues of safety, feasibility and clinical impact of noninvasive diagnosis of coronary vasospasm (CVS).

BACKGROUND

The safety of ergonovine provocation for CVS performed outside the catheterization laboratory has been questioned.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the results of bedside ergonovine provocation testing by monitoring left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) using two-dimensional echocardiography (Erg Echo).

RESULTS

After confirming that there was no significant epicardial coronary stenosis, Erg Echo was performed on 1,372 patients from July 1991 to December 1997. Ergonovine echocardiography was terminated prematurely in 13 patients (0.9%) because of limitations caused by side effects unrelated to myocardial ischemia. Among 1,359 completed tests, 31% (n = 421) showed positive results, with development of RWMAs in 412 tests (98%) or ST displacement in electrocardiograms of nine tests (2%). Arrhythmias developed in 1.9% (26/1,372), including transient ventricular tachycardia (n = 2) and atrioventricular block (n = 4), which were promptly reversed with nitroglycerin. There was no mortality or development of myocardial infarction. Based on the angiographic criteria of 218 patients, the sensitivity and specificity of Erg Echo for the diagnosis of CVS were 93% and 91%, respectively. Since 1994, Erg Echo has become a more popular diagnostic method than invasive spasm provocation testing in the catheterization laboratory and has comprised more than 95% of all spasm provocation tests during the last three years. In the outpatient clinic, 453 patients underwent Erg Echo safely.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this is a retrospective study in a single center, we believe that Erg Echo is highly feasible, accurate and safe for the diagnosis of CVS and can replace invasive angiographic spasm provocation testing in the catheterization laboratory.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CVS = coronary vasospasm   ECG = electrocardiogram   Erg Echo = ergonovine echocardiography   RWMAs = regional wall motion abnormalities

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K. Mishra Variations in presentation and various options in management of variant angina. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 748 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Hamilton and C. J. Pepine A renaissance of provocative testing for coronary spasm? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1857 - 1859. [Full Text] [PDF]