|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:1485-1492 © 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
a Division of Cardiology/Electrophysiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Manuscript received March 19, 1999; revised manuscript received October 20, 1999, accepted January 20, 2000.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Sanjiv M. Narayan, Division of Cardiology/Electrophysiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8086, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
snarayan{at}im.wustl.edu
OBJECTIVES
We sought to study the effect of heart rate acceleration and deceleration on the ability of repolarization alternans (RPA) to stratify ventricular tachycardia (VT) risk.
BACKGROUND
Heart rate fluctuations alter arrhythmic propensity, yet it is unclear whether fluctuations, as well as absolute rate, dynamically increase VT risk. We hypothesized that repolarization heterogeneity reflected by RPA would exhibit hysteresis during rising and falling heart rate, which may reflect arrhythmic propensity.
METHODS
The RPA magnitude (absolute voltage of alternation [Valt] and T-wave alternans ratio [TWAR]) and temporal distribution were determined from the electrocardiogram (ECG) in 60 patients during paced heart rate acceleration from 100 to 150 beats/min, then deceleration to 100 beats/min at electrophysiologic study (EPS). The Valt and TWAR thresholds were varied prospectively to generate receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) for the prediction of inducible VT at EPS.
RESULTS
Thirty-six patients were induced into VT and 24 were not. Hysteresis of RPA was seen. The Valt reached steady-state within 60 beats of each rate transition and was higher in deceleration than in acceleration at matched heart rates. In induced patients, Valt rose then fell with heart rate. In noninduced patients, Valt was insensitive to acceleration, but rose on initial deceleration. The RPA distributed later within repolarization in induced patients but, on deceleration, moved earlier in both groups. By ROC analysis, Valt = 2.6 µV in late repolarization at 120 beats/min provided optimal sensitivity and specificity for VT in acceleration (87.5% and 88.7%, respectively) versus deceleration (80% and 62.5%, respectively; p = 0.004, chi-square test).
CONCLUSIONS
1) Physiologic fluctuations in heart rate may affect the clinical utility of RPA for VT risk stratification; and 2) repolarization dispersion measured by RPA is more exaggerated during deceleration than acceleration at matched heart rates (rate hysteresis).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Narayan, D. D. Drinan, R. P. Lackey, and C. F. Edman Acute volume overload elevates T-wave alternans magnitude J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1462 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Narayan T-Wave Alternans and the Susceptibility to Ventricular Arrhythmias J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 269 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Narayan, A. Hassankhani, G. K. Feld, and V. Bhargava Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Walker, X. Wan, G. E. Kirsch, and D. S. Rosenbaum Hysteresis Effect Implicates Calcium Cycling as a Mechanism of Repolarization Alternans Circulation, November 25, 2003; 108(21): 2704 - 2709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L Walker and D. S Rosenbaum Repolarization alternans: implications for the mechanism and prevention of sudden cardiac death Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2003; 57(3): 599 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Narayan, F. Bode, P. L. Karasik, and M. R. Franz Alternans of Atrial Action Potentials During Atrial Flutter as a Precursor to Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, October 8, 2002; 106(15): 1968 - 1973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |