cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:2031-2034
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saliba, W.
Right arrow Articles by Tchou, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saliba, W.
Right arrow Articles by Tchou, P. J.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Higher energy synchronized external direct current cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation

Walid Saliba, MDa, Nour Juratli, MDa, Mina K. Chung, MD, FACCa, Mark J. Niebauer, MD, FACCa, Okan Erdogan, MDa, Richard Trohman, MD, FACCa, Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD, FACCa, Ralph Augostini, MDa, Kent A. Mowrey, MSa, George R. Nadzam, BSa and Patrick J. Tchou, MD, FACCa

a Department of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Manuscript received December 2, 1998; revised manuscript received May 27, 1999, accepted August 30, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Patrick Tchou, Desk F15, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44124
Tchoup{at}cesmtp.ccf.org

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of higher energy synchronized cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to standard energy direct current (DC) cardioversion.

BACKGROUND

Standard external electrical cardioversion fails to restore sinus rhythm in 5% to 30% of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation who failed to achieve sinus rhythm after at least two attempts at standard external cardioversion with 360 J were included in the study. Two external defibrillators, each connected to its own pair of R-2 patches in the anteroposterior position, were used to deliver a synchronized total of 720 J.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients underwent cardioversion with 720 J. Mean weight was 117 ± 23 kg (body mass index 48.3 ± 4.1 kg/m2). Structural heart disease was present in 76% of patients. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 45 ± 12%. Atrial fibrillation was present for over three months in 55% of the patients. Sinus rhythm was achieved in 46 (84%) of the 55 patients. No major complications were observed. No patient developed hemodynamic compromise and no documented cerebrovascular accident occurred within one month after cardioversion. Of the 46 successful cardioversions, 18 patients (39%) remained in sinus rhythm over a mean follow-up of 2.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

External higher energy cardioversion is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to standard energy DC cardioversion. This method is safe and does not result in clinical evidence of myocardial impairment. It may be a useful alternative to internal cardioversion because it could be done within the same setting of the failed standard cardioversion and obviates the need to withhold protective anticoagulation for internal cardioversion.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  DC = direct current
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  RBBB = right bundle branch block






 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home