CLINICAL STUDIES
Hyperemic coronary flow after optimized intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty and stent implantation
Rob A. M. van Liebergen, MDa,
Jan J. Piek, MDa,1,
Karel T. Koch, MDa,
Ron J. G. Peters, MDa,
Robbert J. de Winter, MDa,
Carl E. Schotborgh, MDa and
Kong I. Lie, MDa
a Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Manuscript received February 1, 1999;
revised manuscript received June 18, 1999,
accepted August 25, 1999.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jan J. Piek, Dept. of Cardiology, B2-108, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands P.O. Box: 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands j.j.piek{at}amc.uva.nl
OBJECTIVES
This study evaluated the acute physiological gain of adjunctive intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided balloon angioplasty and stent implantation.
BACKGROUND
Recent studies indicate safe coronary luminal enlargement and "stent-like" long-term outcomes using upsized balloons guided by IVUS.
METHODS
After angiographically guided balloon angioplasty in 20 patients with 1-vessel disease and normal left ventricular function, IVUS was performed to determine the size of the adjunctive balloon using the mean of the maximal luminal diameter and the maximal diameter of the external elastic membrane measured in the adjacent proximal and distal reference segments. Serial adenosine-induced hyperemic blood flow velocity measurements were performed using a 0.014'' Doppler guide wire to determine the physiological lumen obstruction after standard balloon angioplasty, followed by IVUS-guided balloon angioplasty and stent implantation.
RESULTS
Upsized balloon angioplasty (increase balloon size: 0.98 ± 0.26 mm; balloon:artery ratio 1.35 ± 0.21) resulted in an additional increase of arterial dimensions: minimal lumen diameter (MLD) 2.18 ± 0.38 mm to 2.73 ± 0.51 mm; percent diameter stenosis (%DS) 34 ± 13% to 19 ± 22%; IVUS assessed minimal lumen area (MLA) 7.53 ± 1.55 mm2 to 10.24 ± 2.22 mm2 (all p < 0.0001). Major dissections ( type C) did not occur. Hyperemic blood flow velocity increased from 49.8 ± 20.1 cm/s to 59.1 ± 22.9 cm/s (p < 0.05) after IVUS-guided balloon angioplasty. Adjunctive stent implantation resulted in a further increase of MLD to 3.84 ± 0.51 mm, %DS to 9 ± 21% and MLA to 13.39 ± 1.80 mm2 (all p < 0.0001), while hyperemic blood flow velocity remained unchanged (61.2 ± 24.7 cm/s, p = 0.7).
CONCLUSIONS
Upsized IVUS-guided balloon angioplasty increases arterial coronary dimensions and the distal hyperemic blood flow velocity. Adjunctive stent implantation does not yield a further gain in the hyperemic blood flow velocity, indicating the absence of a functional residual lumen obstruction after IVUS-guided balloon angioplasty. This may explain a similar clinical outcome reported after those coronary interventions.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ANOVA | = analysis of variance | | %AS | = percent area stenosis | | CFVR | = distal coronary flow velocity reserve | | CLOUT | = Clinical Outcomes with Ultrasound Trial | | DEBATE | = Doppler End points Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe | | %DS | = percent diameter stenosis | | IVUS | = intravascular ultrasound | | MLA | = minimal lumen area | | MLD | = minimal lumen diameter | | PTCA | = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty | | QCA | = quantitative coronary angiography | | rCFVR | = relative coronary flow velocity reserve |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Voci, F. Pizzuto, and F. Romeo
Coronary flow: a new asset for the echo lab?
Eur. Heart J.,
November 1, 2004;
25(21):
1867 - 1879.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Schiele, N. Meneveau, M. Gilard, J. Boschat, P. Commeau, L. P. Ming, P. Sewoke, M.-F. Seronde, M. Mercier, S. Gupta, et al.
Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Stent: Immediate and 6-Month Results of the Multicenter, Randomized Balloon Equivalent to Stent Study (BEST)
Circulation,
February 4, 2003;
107(4):
545 - 551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Albertal, E. Regar, G. Van Langenhove, S.G. Carlier, J.J. Piek, B. de Bruyne, C. di Mario, D. Foley, K. Kozuma, M.A. Costa, et al.
Value of coronary stenotic flow velocity acceleration in prediction of angiographic restenosis following balloon angioplasty
Eur. Heart J.,
December 1, 2002;
23(23):
1849 - 1853.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nishida, C. Di Mario, M.J. Kern, T.J. Anderson, I. Moussa, R. Bonan, T. Muramatsu, A.C. Jain, J. Suarez de Lezo, S.Y. Cho, et al.
Impact of final coronary flow velocity reserve on late outcome following stent implantation
Eur. Heart J.,
February 2, 2002;
23(4):
331 - 340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Werner, M. Ferrari, B. M. Richartz, O. Gastmann, and H. R. Figulla
Microvascular Dysfunction in Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions
Circulation,
September 4, 2001;
104(10):
1129 - 1134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Pizzuto, P. Voci, E. Mariano, P. Emilio Puddu, G. Sardella, and A. Nigri
Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 1, 2001;
38(1):
155 - 162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Colombo and C. Briguori
Optimal balloon angioplasty versus elective stent implantation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 1, 1999;
34(7):
1907 - 1909.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|