JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:1857-1866
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mason, R. P.

REVIEW ARTICLES

Calcium channel blockers, apoptosis and cancer: is there a biologic relationship?

R. Preston Mason, PhDa

a Membrane Biophysics Laboratory, Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research Institute, Departments of Biochemistry and Medicine, MCP Hahnemann University School of Medicine, Allegheny Campus, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Manuscript received March 4, 1999; revised manuscript received June 24, 1999, accepted August 27, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. R. Preston Mason, Director, Membrane Biophysics Laboratory, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 E. North Avenue, 2ST, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212-4772
mason{at}pgh.auhs.edu

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) represent a chemically and pharmacologically diverse group of agents that are widely used for the treatment of hypertension and angina. A small number of retrospective, observational analyses have raised concern about a potential causal link between CCB use and an increased risk for cancer development. Despite the absence of cancer findings in extensive preclinical studies, it has been proposed that CCBs may work differently in humans by interfering with apoptosis, leading to an increased potential for abnormal cell proliferation and tumor growth. This biologic hypothesis has attracted considerable attention in the medical community but has not been critically evaluated. An analysis of the basic and clinical literature was conducted to examine biologic relationships among cell Ca2+ modulation, apoptosis, and cancer. In addition to a comprehensive review of the cellular and animal data, the results of large observational studies were included in this analysis. Results of this review demonstrated that the effects of CCBs on apoptosis are complex as both increases and decreases in intracellular Ca2+ have been linked to this form of programmed cell death. Most studies show that an effect (either positive or negative) of CCBs on apoptosis requires doses in the supra-pharmacologic range, and are therefore not clinically relevant. Results of large and methodologically robust observational studies fail to provide support for the hypothesis that CCB use is associated with an increased susceptibility for cancer incidence. A comprehensive analysis of the basic and clinical evidence does not support a causal relationship between the therapeutic use of CCBs and an increased incidence of cancer development as a result of interfering with apoptosis.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  Ca2+ = calcium
  CCB = calcium channel blocker
  RR = relative risk
  TUNEL = terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. D. Debes, R. O. Roberts, D. J. Jacobson, C. J. Girman, M. M. Lieber, D. J. Tindall, and S. J. Jacobsen
Inverse Association between Prostate Cancer and the Use of Calcium Channel Blockers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 255 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. A. Holly and P. M. Bracci
Population-based Study of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Histology, and Medical History among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-negative Participants in San Francisco
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2003; 158(4): 316 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. R. Kizer and S. E. Kimmel
Epidemiologic Review of the Calcium Channel Blocker Drugs: An Up-to-date Perspective on the Proposed Hazards
Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2001; 161(9): 1145 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.