CLINICAL STUDIES
Diagnostic utility of mechanical, pharmacological and orthostatic stimulation of the carotid sinus in patients with unexplained syncope
Carlos A. Morillo, MD ,
Maria E. Camacho, MD ,
Mark A. Wood, MD, FACC*,
David M. Gilligan, MD, FACC and
Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD, FACC*
* Department of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virgnia, USA
Hunter Holmes Mc Guire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, Virgnia, USA
Department of Cardiology, Fundación Cardiovascular del Oriente Colombiano, Bucaramanga, Colombia
Manuscript received January 23, 1996;
revised manuscript received May 12, 1999,
accepted June 29, 1999.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Carlos A. Morillo, Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Fundación Cardiovascular del Oriente, Colombiano Instituto del Corazón, Calle 155A, No. 23-58, Urbanización El Bosque, Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of the present study was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic utility of mechanical, pharmacological and orthostatic stimulation of the carotid sinus in a consecutive series of patients with recurrent unexplained syncope.
BACKGROUND
Carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) is an infrequently recognized cause of recurrent unexplained syncope usually diagnosed by carotid sinus massage (CSM) in the supine position. The diagnostic utility of systematic assessment of mechanical, pharmacological and orthostatic stimulation of the carotid sinus has not been clearly established.
METHODS
Eighty consecutive patients (63 ± 12 years) with a history of recurrent unexplained syncope (mean episodes: 6 ± 3); 30 age-matched controls (65 ± 14 years) and 16 patients (59 ± 12 years) with syncope not related to CSH were studied. Pharmacological stimulation of the carotid sinus was achieved by randomly administering bolus injections of nitroprusside and phenylephrine. Mechanical stimulation of the carotid sinus was performed by CSM applied for 5 s in the supine position and after 2 min at 60°. A 60° low-dose isoproterenol head-up tilt test (HUTT) was also performed for a total duration of 30 min.
RESULTS
Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was elicited by CSM in the supine position in seven (8.7%) patients, two (6.6%) controls and one (6.3%) patient with syncope unrelated to CSH, compared with 48 (60%) patients, two (6.6%) controls and one (6.3%) syncope unrelated to CSH patient after 60° HUTT, increasing the diagnostic yield by 51%. Baroreceptor gain was significantly reduced in the CSH group. Head-up tilt test was positive in 12 (25%) patients with CSH, two (6.6%) controls and two (12%) with documented syncope but not positive in any of the patients in which syncope remained unexplained. Diagnostic accuracy was enhanced by 38% (31% supine vs. 69% upright) when CSM was performed at 60°.
CONCLUSIONS
CSH was documented in 68% of patients, 8.7% in the supine position and 60% in the upright position. Sensitivity was increased by 51%, and diagnostic accuracy was enhanced by 38% by performing CSM in the upright position. Decreased baroreceptor gain was documented and may play a role in the pathophysiology of CSH.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CSH | = carotid sinus hypersensitivity | | CSM | = carotid sinus massage | | ECG | = electrocardiogram | | HUTT | = head-up tilt test | | VF | = ventricular fibrillation | | VT | = ventricular tachycardia |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A M Humm and C J Mathias
Unexplained syncope--is screening for carotid sinus hypersensitivity indicated in all patients aged >40 years?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
November 1, 2006;
77(11):
1267 - 1270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. L. Coplan
Carotid sinus hypersensitivity and syncope: cause/effect or true/true/unrelated.
Arch Intern Med,
March 13, 2006;
166(5):
491 - 492.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. J. Kerr, M. S. Pearce, C. Brayne, R. J. Davis, and R. A. Kenny
Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in asymptomatic older persons: implications for diagnosis of syncope and falls.
Arch Intern Med,
March 13, 2006;
166(5):
515 - 520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Strickberger, D. W. Benson, I. Biaggioni, D. J. Callans, M. I. Cohen, K. A. Ellenbogen, A. E. Epstein, P. Friedman, J. Goldberger, P. A. Heidenreich, et al.
AHA/ACCF Scientific Statement on the Evaluation of Syncope: From the American Heart Association Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Cardiovascular Nursing, Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and Stroke, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group; and the American College of Cardiology Foundation In Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 17, 2006;
47(2):
473 - 484.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Strickberger, D. W. Benson, I. Biaggioni, D. J. Callans, M. I. Cohen, K. A. Ellenbogen, A. E. Epstein, P. Friedman, J. Goldberger, P. A. Heidenreich, et al.
AHA/ACCF Scientific Statement on the Evaluation of Syncope: From the American Heart Association Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Cardiovascular Nursing, Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and Stroke, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group; and the American College of Cardiology Foundation: In Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society: Endorsed by the American Autonomic Society
Circulation,
January 17, 2006;
113(2):
316 - 327.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Singh, M. I. Zia, and R. A. Fowler
Cat naps: an elderly woman with recurrent syncope
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
October 28, 2003;
169(9):
940 - 940.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Carey, J. F. Potter, A. D. Krahn, G. J. Klein, R. Yee, and A. C. Skanes
Randomized Assessment of Syncope Trial Response
Circulation,
January 15, 2002;
105
(2):
e8 - e8.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Fitzpatrick and A. Zaidi
Tilt methodology in reflex syncope: emerging evidence
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 1, 2000;
36(1):
179 - 180.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Evaluate Suspected Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity with Patients in the Upright Position
Journal Watch Cardiology,
December 10, 1999;
1999(1210):
7 - 7.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|