Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:1369-1377
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, E. D.

REVIEW ARTICLES

The necessity for recognition and treatment of patients with "mild" hypertension1

Edward D. Frohlich, MD, FACC*

* Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Manuscript received June 10, 1999; revised manuscript received June 23, 1999, accepted June 30, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Edward D. Frohlich, Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 1516 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, Louisiana 70124

A dramatic evolution has occurred in the past four decades in our underlying knowledge of pathophysiology of the hypertensive diseases and in the availability of myriad pharmacologic agents for control of hypertension. This report provides a current review of antihypertensive treatment interspersed with personal opinions supported by appropriate references. It focuses on the recent national recommendations dealing with the prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of the disease (JNC-6). Whereas I believe that the height of arterial pressure is of primary importance, it is not the sine qua non explaining all target organ involvement or complications of hypertensive disease. Consequently, all that is classified today as Stages 1 and 2 hypertension (old terminology: "mild" and "moderate") in terms of blood pressure elevation does not explain all outcomes of disease. Indeed, JNC-6 introduced the new concept of risk stratification for therapy based not only on the height of systolic and diastolic pressure but also on the presence of target organ involvement, comorbidity and other risk factors. However, after considerable advances since the inception of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP) in 1972, it appears that we are avoiding our responsibilities and reversing our gains. It is of vital importance that we renew our efforts to identify, evaluate and treat all patients with hypertension; this is especially so for the vast numbers of patients with Stages 1 and 2 hypertension.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACE = angiotensin converting enzyme
  ARB = angiotensin II (type I) receptor blocker
  CHD = coronary heart disease
  ESRD = end stage renal disease
  JNC-5 and JNC-6 = national recommendations dealing with the prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of hypertensive disease
  MI = myocardial infarction
  NHBPEP = National High Blood Pressure Education Program




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
H. M. Perry, E. D. Freis, and E. D. Frohlich
Department of Veterans Affairs Hypertension Meeting : A Proposal for Improved Care
Hypertension, April 1, 2000; 35(4): 853 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement