CLINICAL STUDIES
Prognostic importance of lower extremity arterial disease in patients undergoing coronary revascularization in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI)
Karen A. Burek, RN, MS*,
Kim Sutton-Tyrrell, DrPH1, ,
Maria Mori Brooks, PhD ,
Barbara Naydeck, MPH ,
Norma Keller, MD ,
Mary Ann Sellers, RN, MSN ,
Gary Roubin, MD, FACC||,
R. ena Jandová, MD, CSc¶ and
Charanjit S. Rihal, MD, FACC#
* University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
|| University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
¶ Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
# Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Manuscript received September 9, 1998;
revised manuscript received March 29, 1999,
accepted May 14, 1999.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Karen A. Burek, University of Pittsburgh, 127 Parran Hall, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic importance of lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND
The presence of clinically evident LEAD increases the risk of death in patients with known coronary artery disease. Because studies have lacked noninvasive measures of subclinical LEAD, the true prognostic importance of lower extremity atherosclerosis in this population has probably been underestimated.
METHODS
Ankle blood pressures were measured in 405 consecutive patients with angiographically documented multivessel coronary disease from seven Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) sites and a parallel study site within 3 years of enrollment. Lower extremity arterial disease was defined as an ankle/arm systolic blood pressure ratio of 0.90 or less.
RESULTS
Among patients studied, 69 (17%) had LEAD. These patients were more likely to be current smokers, treated for diabetes, older and present with unstable angina compared with patients without LEAD. Among patients who underwent coronary arterial bypass grafting, major complications occurred in 2.8% of those without LEAD compared with 20.7% of those with LEAD (p = 0.002). Five-year mortality rates were similar for symptomatic LEAD (14%) and asymptomatic LEAD (14%). Patients without LEAD had a 3% mortality. After adjusting for baseline differences, the relative risk of death was 4.9 times greater for patients with LEAD compared with those without (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8, 13.4, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with LEAD have a significantly higher risk of death than patients without LEAD, regardless of the presence of symptoms. An abnormal ankle/arm index is a strong predictor of mortality and can be used to further stratify risk among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AAI | = ankle/arm index | | BARI | = Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation | | CABG | = coronary arterial bypass grafting | | CI | = confidence interval | | LEAD | = lower extremity arterial disease | | MI | = myocardial infarction | | PTCA | = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Authors/Task Force Members:, G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagard, G. Germano, G. Grassi, A. M. Heagerty, S. E. Kjeldsen, et al.
2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Eur. Heart J.,
June 11, 2007;
(2007)
ehm236v1.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Aboyans, P. Lacroix, A. Postil, J. Guilloux, F. Rolle, E. Cornu, and M. Laskar
Subclinical Peripheral Arterial Disease and Incompressible Ankle Arteries Are Both Long-Term Prognostic Factors in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 6, 2005;
46(5):
815 - 820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. O'Rourke, H. B. Quinton, W. Piper, F. Hernandez, J. Morton, B. Hettleman, M. Hearne, W. Nugent, G. T. O'Connor, and D. J. Malenka
Survival in patients with peripheral vascular disease after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
August 1, 2004;
78(2):
466 - 470.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Rodriguez, M Rodriguez Alemparte, J Baldi, J Navia, A Delacasa, D Vogel, R Oliveri, C Fernandez Pereira, V Bernardi, W O'Neill, et al.
Coronary stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease and significant proximal LAD stenosis: results from the ERACI II study
Heart,
February 1, 2003;
89(2):
184 - 188.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rodriguez, V. Bernardi, J. Navia, J. Baldi, L. Grinfeld, J. Martinez, D. Vogel, R. Grinfeld, A. Delacasa, M. Garrido, et al.
Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 2001;
37(1):
51 - 58.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease
Journal Watch (General),
September 14, 1999;
1999(914):
5 - 5.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|