CLINICAL STUDIES
Is it necessary to routinely fenestrate an extracardiac Fontan?
LeNardo D. Thompson, MDa,
Edwin Petrossian, MDa,
Doff B. McElhinney, MDa,
Natalia A. Abrikosova, MSa,
Phillip Moore, MDa,
V. Mohan Reddy, MDa and
Frank L. Hanley, MDa
a Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Pediatric Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
Manuscript received October 19, 1998;
revised manuscript received March 4, 1999,
accepted April 22, 1999.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. LeNardo D. Thompson, UCSF Medical Center, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M593, San Francisco, California 94143-0118
OBJECTIVES
This study was conducted to assess the need for, and use of, fenestration of an extracardiac conduit Fontan.
BACKGROUND
Fenestration of a Fontan connection has been proposed as a means of improving outcomes of single ventricle palliation. The benefit of fenestration is likely to be greatest in the early postoperative period when patients may experience increased pulmonary vascular resistance and decreased ventricular function due to the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping and positive pressure ventilation. However, there are potential drawbacks to fenestration. The utility of fenestration with extracardiac Fontan operation has not been determined.
METHODS
Since 1992, 81 patients have undergone a modification of the Fontan procedure in which an extracardiac inferior cavopulmonary conduit is used in combination with a previously staged bidirectional Glenn anastomosis. We conducted a retrospective review of these patients.
RESULTS
Fenestration was performed selectively in 32 patients (39%), including only 2 of the last 38 (5%). In seven patients, a fenestration was placed or clipped in the early postoperative period without cardiopulmonary bypass. There were two operative deaths. Prolonged (>2 weeks) pleural drainage occurred in 13 patients, 8 with fenestration and 5 without. In addition to undergoing earlier Fontan in our experience, patients who had a fenestration placed had significantly higher preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance, significantly higher common atrial pressure after Fontan and significantly lower post-Fontan systemic arterial oxygen saturation. Fontan pressure did not differ between nonfenestrated and fenestrated patients. At follow-up ranging to five years, there were two late deaths and no patients developed protein losing enteropathy.
CONCLUSIONS
Fenestration is not necessary in most Fontan patients when an extracardiac conduit technique is performed as described in this article, and therefore, should not be performed routinely with the extracardiac conduit Fontan. The need for fenestration should be assessed after cardiopulmonary bypass when hemodynamics can be evaluated accurately. Fenestration can be placed and revised easily without bypass and with minimal intervention in patients with an extracardiac conduit Fontan.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Harada, S. Uchita, T. Sakamoto, M. Kimura, K. Umezu, K. Takigiku, and S. Yasukouchi
Do we need fenestration when performing two-staged total cavopulmonary connection using an extracardiac conduit?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
July 1, 2009;
9(1):
50 - 54.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Meadows, P. Lang, G. Marx, and J. Rhodes
Fontan Fenestration Closure Has No Acute Effect on Exercise Capacity but Improves Ventilatory Response to Exercise
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 8, 2008;
52(2):
108 - 113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-J. Kim, W.-H. Kim, H.-G. Lim, and J.-Y. Lee
Outcome of 200 patients after an extracardiac Fontan procedure
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
July 1, 2008;
136(1):
108 - 116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Schreiber, J. Horer, M. Vogt, J. Cleuziou, Z. Prodan, and R. Lange
Nonfenestrated Extracardiac Total Cavopulmonary Connection in 132 Consecutive Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2007;
84(3):
894 - 899.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B.M. Hosein, A. J.B. Clarke, S. P. McGuirk, M. Griselli, O. Stumper, J. V. De Giovanni, D. J. Barron, and W. J. Brawn
Factors influencing early and late outcome following the Fontan procedure in the current era. The 'Two Commandments'?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
March 1, 2007;
31(3):
344 - 353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Pekkan, H. D. Kitajima, D. de Zelicourt, J. M. Forbess, W. J. Parks, M. A. Fogel, S. Sharma, K. R. Kanter, D. Frakes, and A. P. Yoganathan
Total Cavopulmonary Connection Flow With Functional Left Pulmonary Artery Stenosis: Angioplasty and Fenestration In Vitro
Circulation,
November 22, 2005;
112(21):
3264 - 3271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Kavarana, S. Pagni, M. R. Recto, W. L. Sobczyk, T. Yeh Jr, M. Mitchell, and E. H. Austin III
Seven-Year Clinical Experience With the Extracardiac Pedicled Pericardial Fontan Operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
July 1, 2005;
80(1):
37 - 43.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Bradley, D. G. Human, J.A. G. Culham, W. J. Duncan, M. W. H. Patterson, J. G. LeBlanc, and S. S. Sett
Clipped tube fenestration after extracardiac Fontan allows for simple transcatheter coil occlusion
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
December 1, 2003;
76(6):
1923 - 1928.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ovroutski, V. Alexi-Meskishvili, P. Ewert, J.-H. Nurnberg, R. Hetzer, and P.E. Lange
Early and medium-term results after modified Fontan operation in adults
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
March 1, 2003;
23(3):
311 - 316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Gaynor, N. D. Bridges, M. I. Cohen, W. T. Mahle, W. M. DeCampli, J. M. Steven, S. C. Nicolson, and T. L. Spray
Predictors of outcome after the Fontan operation: Is hypoplastic left heart syndrome still a risk factor?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
February 1, 2002;
123(2):
237 - 245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Lemler, W. A. Scott, S. R. Leonard, D. Stromberg, and C. Ramaciotti
Fenestration Improves Clinical Outcome of the Fontan Procedure: A Prospective, Randomized Study
Circulation,
January 15, 2002;
105(2):
207 - 212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Fedderly, B. N. Whitstone, S. J. Frisbee, J. S. Tweddell, and S. B. Litwin
Factors Related to Pleural Effusions After Fontan Procedure in the Era of Fenestration
Circulation,
September 18, 2001;
104
(2009):
I-148 - I-151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Coon, J. Rychik, R. T. Novello, P. S. Ro, J. W. Gaynor, and T. L. Spray
Thrombus formation after the Fontan operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
June 1, 2001;
71(6):
1990 - 1994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Gaca, W. I. Douglas, and S. D. Barnes
Anesthetic Implications of the Fontan Procedure for Single Ventricle Physiology
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
March 1, 2001;
5(1):
31 - 39.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Alexi-Meskishvili, S. Ovroutski, I. Dahnert, P. E. Lange, and R. Hetzer
Early experience with extracardiac Fontan operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
January 1, 2001;
71(1):
71 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|