Advertisement





Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:351-357
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mont, L.
Right arrow Articles by Brugada, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mont, L.
Right arrow Articles by Brugada, J.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Arrhythmia recurrence in patients with a healed myocardial infarction who received an implantable defibrillator: analysis according to the clinical presentation

Lluís Mont, MDa, Mariana Valentino, MDa, Antonia Sambola, MDa, Mariona Matas, RNa, Luis Aguinaga, MDa and Josep Brugada, MDa

a Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Manuscript received August 17, 1998; revised manuscript received March 6, 1999, accepted April 14, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Lluís Mont, Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
jllmont{at}medicina.ub.es

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to analyze the type of arrhythmia recurrence, based on stored electrograms, in patients with a healed myocardial infarction (MI) who received an implantable defibrillator.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that patients presenting with cardiac arrest (CA) tend to recur as ventricular fibrillation (VF), whereas those suffering sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) tend to recur as SMVT. However, these data have not been confirmed in a homogeneous population of patients with MI.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients was divided into three groups according to their clinical presentation: SMVT (n = 57), CA (n = 16) or syncope (n = 15).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics among groups. In the electrophysiologic study SMVT was induced in 93%, 94% and 80% of patients, respectively (p = NS). During the follow-up period, 52% of patients presented a total of 671 episodes of ventricular arrhythmia treated by the defibrillator. All recurrences were as SMVT except for one VF. There were 610 episodes of SMVT treated with antitachycardia pacing, with an effectiveness of 96%. A total of 61 episodes was treated initially with cardioversion. No differences in the probability of recurrence were observed among groups, although the statistical power was low (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an old infarction and malignant ventricular arrhythmias, the majority of recurrences are due to SMVT independently of the clinical presentation (SMVT, CA or syncope) or the induced arrhythmia at the electrophysiologic study. The programming of an antitachycardia zone seems to be appropriate also for patients who present with CA or syncope.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ATP = antitachycardia pacing
  CA = cardiac arrest
  ECG = electrocardiographic
  EPS = electrophysiologic study
  ICD = implantable cardiac defibrillator
  MI = myocardial infarction
  SMVT = sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia
  VF = ventricular fibrillation
  VT = ventricular tachycardia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Brembilla-Perrot, C. Suty-Selton, D. Beurrier, P. Houriez, M. Nippert, A. Terrier de la Chaise, P. Louis, O. Claudon, M. Andronache, A. Abdelaah, et al.
Differences in mechanisms and outcomes of syncope in patients with coronary disease or idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by electrophysiologic testing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 594 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Garcia-Moran, L. Mont, A. Cuesta, M. Matas, and J. Brugada
Low recurrence of syncope in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2002; 23(11): 901 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R.N.W. Hauer, E. Aliot, M. Block, A. Capucci, B. Luderitz, M. Santini, and P.E. Vardas
Indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Study Group on Guidelines on ICDs of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group on Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2001; 22(13): 1074 - 1081.
[PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. N. W. Hauer, E. Aliot, M. Block, A. Capucci, B. Luderitz, M. Santini, and P. E. Vardas
Indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy: Study Group on Guidelines on ICD of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group on Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 169 - 176.
[PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement