cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:1996-2002
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Haïssaguerre, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Haïssaguerre, M.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Partial cavotricuspid isthmus block before ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter

Atsushi Takahashi, MDa, Dipen C. Shah, MDa, Pierre Jaïs, MDa, Meleze Hocini, MDa, Jacques Clementy, MDa and Michel Haïssaguerre, MDa

a Electrophysiologie Cardiaque, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux-Pessac, France

Manuscript received June 4, 1998; revised manuscript received January 19, 1999, accepted February 10, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Atsushi Takahashi, Division of Cardiology, Tsuchiura Kyodo Hospital 11-7, Shinmachi Manabe, Tsuchiurachi-shi, Ibaraki-key, 3000531, Japan

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate preexisting partial isthmus block in the context of an electrophysiologically directed linear ablation strategy for typical atrial flutter (AF).

BACKGROUND

Double potentials (DPs) separated by an isoelectric interval have been recognized as markers of local block. However, the presence and significance of DPs in the cavotricuspid isthmus during AF before ablation have not been evaluated.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with AF (counterclockwise: 24, clockwise: 6) were studied during AF. Sequential withdrawal mapping was performed in the cavotricuspid isthmus from the tricuspid valve (TV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) edge with electrograms coinciding with the center of the surface electrocardiographic plateau during counterclockwise AF or with the initial downslope of the positive flutter wave during clockwise AF. Atrial electrograms along this line were categorized as double, single or fractionated potentials (SPs or FPs). After demarcation of the zone of contiguous DPs, radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation was performed during AF only at sites with SPs or FPs (other than DPs) on the mapped line. If isthmus conduction still persisted after AF termination, additional RF applications were delivered using the same electrophysiologic strategy of avoiding DPs with an isoelectric interval during low lateral right atrial pacing for filling in the gap of residual conduction.

RESULTS

Before ablation, no DPs were recorded in the isthmus in 19 patients (63%); DPs were recorded only at the IVC edge in five patients, and only at the TV edge in one patient. A contiguous line of DPs extending through more than half the isthmus to the IVC edge was documented in five patients (17%: group DP). In group DP, AF was terminated with 1.4 ± 0.5 applications (vs. 5.8 ± 3.5 in the remaining patients: p < 0.01). Complete isthmus block was achieved with a total of 3.4 ± 0.5 applications (vs. 12 ± 6 in the remaining patients: p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Seventeen percent of patients undergoing ablation of AF have preexisting partial isthmus block indicated by a large contiguous zone of DPs separated by an isoelectric interval. Electrophysiologically directed linear ablation avoiding confluent DPs can prevent unnecessary applications for effective cure of AF.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AF = atrial flutter
  DP = double potential
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  FP = fractionated potential
  IVC = inferior vena cava
  RF = radiofrequency
  SP = single potential
  TV = tricuspid valve




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Schmieder, G. Ndrepepa, J. Dong, B. Zrenner, J. Schreieck, M. A.E. Schneider, M. R. Karch, and C. Schmitt
Acute and long-term results of radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter and the influence of the right atrial isthmus ablation on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2003; 24(10): 956 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Turco, G. Stabile, A. De Simone, and B. El Jamal
Double potentials analysis as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 916 - 916.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Tada, H. Oral, C. Sticherling, S. P. Chough, R. L. Baker, K. Wasmer, F. Pelosi Jr, B. P. Knight, S. A. Strickberger, and F. Morady
Double potentials along the ablation line as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2001; 38(3): 750 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
David M. Harrild, Craig S. Henriquez ;
A Computer Model of Normal Conduction in the Human Atria
Circ. Res., September 29, 2000; 87 (7): e25 - e36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home