HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ledru, F. Articles by Blanchard, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ledru, F. Articles by Blanchard, D.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Geometric features of coronary artery lesions favoring acute occlusion and myocardial infarction: a quantitative angiographic study

Francois Ledru, MD^a, Pierre Théroux, MD, Jacques Lespérance, MD, Jean Laurier, MSc, Pierre Ducimetière, PhD^*, Jean-L.éon Guermonprez, MD^a, Benoit Diébold, MD, PhD^a and Didier Blanchard, MD^a

^a Department of Cardiology, Broussais Hospital, Paris, France
^* INSERM Unit 258, Broussais Hospital, Paris, France
Department of Medecine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada
Department of Radiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada

Manuscript received June 5, 1998; revised manuscript received October 19, 1998, accepted January 5, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Francois Ledru, Département de Cardiologie, Hopital Broussais, 96 rue Didot, 75014 Paris, France
francois.ledru{at}brs.ap-hop-paris.fr

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify the angiographic predictors of a future infarction, to study their interaction with time to infarction, patient risk factors and medications, and to evaluate their clinical utility for risk stratification.

BACKGROUND

Identification of coronary lesions at risk of acute occlusion remains challenging. Stenosis severity is poorly predictive but other stenosis descriptors might be better predictors.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with an acute myocardial infarction and a coronary angiogram performed within the preceding 36 months (baseline angiogram), and after infarction were selected. All coronary stenoses (from 10% to 95% lumen diameter reduction) at baseline angiogram were analyzed by computer-assisted quantification. Each of the 84 lesions responsible for the infarction (culprit) was compared with the nonculprit stenoses (controls) in the same patient.

RESULTS

Culprit lesions were more symmetrical (symmetry index +15%; p < 0.001), had steeper outflow angles (maximal angle +4°; p < 0.001), were more severe (percent stenosis +5%; p = 0.001) and longer (+1.5 mm, p = 0.01) than controls. The symmetry index and the outflow angles were the two independent predictors of infarction at three-year follow-up. Stenosis severity predicted only infarctions occurring within 1 year after angiography. In moderately severe stenoses (40% to 70% stenosis), stratification using the symmetry index and outflow angles accurately predicted lesions remaining free of occlusion and infarction at three-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Better characterization of stenosis geometry might help to understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms triggering coronary occlusion and to stratify patients for improved care.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   AMI = acute myocardial infarction   CAD = coronary artery disease   CMS = Coronary Measurement System   ECG = electrocardiogram   IRL = infarct-related lesion   PS = percent lumen diameter stenosis   QCA = quantitative coronary analysis   SIS = stenoses of intermediate severity   TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Waxman, F. Ishibashi, and J. E. Muller Detection and Treatment of Vulnerable Plaques and Vulnerable Patients: Novel Approaches to Prevention of Coronary Events Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2390 - 2411. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K P Morgan, A Kapur, and K J Beatt Anatomy of coronary disease in diabetic patients: an explanation for poorer outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and potential target for intervention Heart, July 1, 2004; 90(7): 732 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Bigi, L Cortigiani, P Colombo, A Desideri, J J Bax, and O Parodi Prognostic and clinical correlates of angiographically diffuse non-obstructive coronary lesions Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 1009 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Mallat and A. Tedgui Current Perspective on the Role of Apoptosis in Atherothrombotic Disease Circ. Res., May 25, 2001; 88(10): 998 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ledru, P. Ducimetiere, S. Battaglia, D. Courbon, F. Beverelli, L. Guize, J.-L.e. Guermonprez, and B. Diebold New diagnostic criteria for diabetes and coronary artery disease: insights from an angiographic study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1543 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Tousoulis, G. Davies, C. Stefanadis, and P. Toutouzas Can angiography predict the vulnerable lesion that progresses to myocardial infarction? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 261 - 262. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ledru, P. Theroux, and J. Lesperance Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 262 - 262. [Full Text] [PDF]