CLINICAL STUDIES
Phasic coronary flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block and normal coronary arteries
Emmanuel I. Skalidis, MDa,
George E. Kochiadakis, MDa,
Sophia I. Koukouraki, MD*,
Fragiskos I. Parthenakis, MDa,
Nikolaos S. Karkavitsas, MD* and
Panos E. Vardas, MD, PhD, FESC, FACCa
a Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
* Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Manuscript received May 26, 1998;
revised manuscript received November 6, 1998,
accepted December 23, 1998.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Prof. Panos E. Vardas, Cardiology Department, Heraklion University Hospital, P.O. Box 1352 Stavrakia, GR 711 10 Heraklion, Crete, Greece cardio{at}danae.med.uoc.gr
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to determine whether scintigraphic myocardial perfusion defects in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and normal coronary arteries are related to abnormalities in coronary flow velocity pattern and/or coronary flow reserve.
BACKGROUND
Septal or anteroseptal defects on exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy are common in patients with LBBB and normal coronary arteries.
METHODS
Thirteen patients (7 men, age 61 ± 8 years) with LBBB and normal coronary arteries underwent stress thallium-201 scintigraphy and cardiac catheterization. In all patients and in 11 control subjects coronary blood flow parameters were calculated from Doppler measurements of flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) before and after adenosine administration.
RESULTS
The time to maximum peak diastolic flow velocity was significantly longer both for the seven patients with (134 ± 19 ms) and for the six without (136 ± 7 ms) exercise perfusion defects than for controls (105 ± 12 ms, p < 0.05), whereas the acceleration was slower (170 ± 54, 186 ± 42 and 279 ± 96 cm/s2, respectively, p < 0.05). Coronary flow reserve in the patients with exercise perfusion defects (2.7 ± 0.3) was significantly lower than in those without (3.7 ± 0.5, p < 0.05) or in the control group (3.4 ± 0.5, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with LBBB have an impairment of early diastolic blood flow in the LAD due to an increase in early diastolic compressive resistance resulting from delayed ventricular relaxation. Furthermore, exercise scintigraphic perfusion defects in these patients are associated with a reduced coronary flow reserve, indicating abnormalities of microvascular function in the same vascular territory.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ANOVA | = analysis of variance | | ECG | = electrocardiographic | | IV | = intravenous | | LAD | = left anterior descending coronary artery | | LBBB | = left bundle branch block |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. I. Skalidis and P. E. Vardas
Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris
Eur. Heart J.,
November 1, 2006;
27(21):
2606 - 2606.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Westerhof, C. Boer, R. R. Lamberts, and P. Sipkema
Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature.
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2006;
86(4):
1263 - 1308.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Rigo, S. Gherardi, M. Galderisi, L. Pratali, L. Cortigiani, R. Sicari, and E. Picano
The prognostic impact of coronary flow-reserve assessed by Doppler echocardiography in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J.,
June 1, 2006;
27(11):
1319 - 1323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Wieneke, K. Sattler, C. von Birgelen, D. Bose, M. Haude, W. Rechenberg, S. Sack, N. Dagres, and R. Erbel
Impact of intraventricular conduction delay on coronary haemodynamics: a study with intracoronary Doppler in patients with bundle branch blocks and normal coronary arteries.
Europace,
March 1, 2006;
8(3):
151 - 156.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Vernooy, X. A.A.M. Verbeek, M. Peschar, H. J.G.M. Crijns, T. Arts, R. N.M. Cornelussen, and F. W. Prinzen
Left bundle branch block induces ventricular remodelling and functional septal hypoperfusion
Eur. Heart J.,
January 1, 2005;
26(1):
91 - 98.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. I. Skalidis, F. I. Parthenakis, A. P. Patrianakos, M. I. Hamilos, and P. E. Vardas
Regional coronary flow and contractile reserve in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 16, 2004;
44(10):
2027 - 2032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ozdemir, B. B. Altunkeser, B. Korkut, M. Tokac, and H. Gok
Effect of Left Bundle Branch Block on Systolic and Diastolic Function of Left Ventricle in Heart Failure
Angiology,
January 1, 2004;
55(1):
63 - 71.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. I. Skalidis, P. E. Vardas, H. Ukkonen, R. S.B. Beanlands, I. Burwash, R. A. de Kemp, A. S.L. Tang, C. Nahmias, E. Fallen, and M. R.S. Hill
Cardiac Resynchronization and Myocardial Oxidative Metabolism * Response
Circulation,
June 24, 2003;
107
(24):
e220 - e220.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Picano
Specificity of non invasive pacemaker stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 19, 2003;
41(6):
1069 - 1069.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. I. Skalidis, G. E. Kochiadakis, N. E. Igoumenidis, K. E. Vardakis, and P. E. Vardas
Phasic coronary blood flow velocity pattern and flow reserve in the atrium: regulation of left atrial myocardial perfusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 19, 2003;
41(4):
674 - 680.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Vigna, M. Stanislao, V. De Rito, A. Russo, R. Natali, T. Santoro, and F. Loperfido
Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography vs Dipyridamole Sestamibi Scintigraphy for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease in Left Bundle-Branch Block
Chest,
November 1, 2001;
120(5):
1534 - 1539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. I. Skalidis, G. E. Kochiadakis, S. I. Koukouraki, S. I. Chrysostomakis, N. E. Igoumenidis, N. S. Karkavitsas, and P. E. Vardas
Myocardial perfusion in patients with permanent ventricular pacing and normal coronary arteries
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 2001;
37(1):
124 - 129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|