This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Senni, M. Articles by Oh, J. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Senni, M. Articles by Oh, J. K.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis

Doppler echocardiographic findings and correlation with clinical status

Michele Senni, MD^*, Margaret M. Redfield, MD, FACC^*, Lieng H. Ling, MB, BS, MRCP^*, Gordon K. Danielson, MD, FACC, A. Jamil Tajik, MD, FACC^* and Jae K. Oh, MD, FACC^*

^* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Manuscript received July 14, 1998; revised manuscript received November 5, 1998, accepted December 22, 1998.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jae K. Oh, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

OBJECTIVES

The study assessed changes in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis and correlated postoperative Doppler echocardiographic findings with clinical status.

BACKGROUND

Despite the efficacy of pericardiectomy, some patients with constrictive pericarditis fail to improve postoperatively. Data on serial evaluation of systolic and diastolic function after pericardiectomy and its relation to clinical status are not available.

METHODS

From 1985 to 1995, a total of 58 patients with constrictive pericarditis underwent pericardiectomy and had at least one follow-up Doppler echocardiographic study with a respirometer: 23 patients had one examination within 3 months postoperatively, 19 had a study within 3 months and another one more than 3 months postoperatively, and 16 had one study more than 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

In the early postoperative period, diastolic function was normal in 17 patients (40.5%), restrictive in 17 (40.5%), and constrictive in 8 (19%). Among 19 patients who had serial Doppler echocardiography, in 2 patients with restrictive physiology and 5 with constrictive physiology the results had become normal, and 1 patient who had had constrictive physiology had restrictive findings. In late follow-up, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter increased compared with preoperative measurement (p = 0.0009). Diastolic filling pattern at late follow-up was normal in 20 patients (57%), restrictive in 12 (34%) and constrictive in 3 (9%). There was a significant relationship between diastolic filling patterns and symptomatic status (² = 20.9, p < 0.0001). Patients with persistent abnormal diastolic filling on Doppler echocardiography had had symptoms for a longer time preoperatively than did patients with normal diastolic physiology (p = 0.0471).

CONCLUSIONS

Diastolic filling characteristics remain abnormal in a substantial number of patients with constrictive pericarditis after pericardiectomy. These abnormalities may resolve gradually but can persist. Diastolic filling abnormalities after pericardiectomy correlate well with clinical symptoms and tend to occur in patients who have had symptoms longer preoperatively. This finding supports the recommendation that pericardiectomy be performed promptly in symptomatic patients with constrictive pericarditis.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   E/A ratio = ratio of peak early (E) and late (A) transvalvular filling velocities   NYHA = New York Heart Association

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Anderson, E. Rodriguez, R. L. Shammas, and A. P. Kypson Early constrictive epicarditis after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 642 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. P. Sengupta, V. K. Krishnamoorthy, W. P. Abhayaratna, J. Korinek, M. Belohlavek, T. M. Sundt III, K. Chandrasekaran, F. Mookadam, J. B. Seward, A. J. Tajik, et al. Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 29 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. K. Chowdhury, G. K. Subramaniam, A. S. Kumar, B. Airan, R. Singh, S. Talwar, S. Seth, P. K. Mishra, K. K. Pradeep, S. Sathia, et al. Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis: A Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Two Surgical Techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 522 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Task Force members, B. Maisch, P. M. Seferovic, A. D. Ristic, R. Erbel, R. Rienmuller, Y. Adler, W. Z. Tomkowski, G. Thiene, M. H. Yacoub, et al. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases Executive Summary: The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2004; 25(7): 587 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Schofield, S. B. Shoemaker, E. G. Ryerson, G. R. Cooper, and W. D. Spotnitz Left ventricular dysfunction after pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1449 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Tiruvoipati, R. D. Naik, M. Loubani, and G. N. Billa Surgical approach for pericardiectomy: a comparative study between median sternotomy and left anterolateral thoracotomy Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 322 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Tirilomis Pericardiectomy for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2002; 10(3): 288 - 289. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Harada, T. Aoyagi, Y. Endo, K. Uno, K. Takenaka, F. Nakamura, M. Sonoda, T. Takahashi, T. Yamazaki, Y. Hiroi, et al. Effusive Constrictive Pericarditis Due to Rheumatoid Arthritis Revealed by Pericardiocentesis with Simultaneous Pressure Recording: A Case Report Angiology, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 105 - 108. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Omoto, K. Minami, D. Varvaras, D. Bothig, and R. Korfer Radical Pericardiectomy for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2001; 9(4): 286 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Skubas, M. Beardslee, B. Barzilai, M. Pasque, M. Kattapuram, and D. G. Lappas Constrictive Pericarditis: Intraoperative Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Evaluation of Cardiac Filling Dynamics Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1424 - 1426. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. H. Ling, J. K. Oh, H. V. Schaff, G. K. Danielson, D. W. Mahoney, J. B. Seward, and A. J. Tajik Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era : Evolving Clinical Spectrum and Impact on Outcome After Pericardiectomy Circulation, September 28, 1999; 100(13): 1380 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]