|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:1163-1173 © 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
a Baker Medical Research Institute, Melbourne, 8008, Australia
Manuscript received August 12, 1998; revised manuscript received November 23, 1998, accepted January 5, 1999.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Baker Medical Research Institute, PO Box 6492, Melbourne 8008, Victoria, Australia
One possible intervention to interrupt the deleterious effects of the renin-angiotensin system is suppression of angiotensin II (Ang II) formation by inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). However, ACE inhibition incompletely suppresses Ang II formation and also leads to accumulation of bradykinin. Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors are believed to promote the known deleterious effects of Ang II. Therefore, AT1 receptor antagonists have been recently introduced into therapy for hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there are significant differences between the effects of AT1 receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors including the unopposed stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptors by AT1 receptor antagonists, the discussion of whether ACE inhibitors, AT1 receptor antagonists or the combination of both are superior in the pharmacotherapy of CHF is still largely theoretical. Accordingly, AT1 receptor antagonists are still investigational. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remain first line therapy in patients with CHF due to systolic dysfunction. However, in patients not able to tolerate ACE inhibitor induced side effects, in particular cough, AT1 receptor antagonism is a good alternative. In clinical practice, emphasis should be placed on increasing the utilization of ACE inhibitors, as more than 50% of patients with CHF do not receive ACE inhibitors. In addition, the majority of those on ACE inhibitors receive doses lower than the dosage used in the large clinical trials. Although not yet completely proved, it is likely that high doses of ACE inhibition are superior to low doses with respect to prognosis and symptoms.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Dilsizian, W. C. Eckelman, M. L. Loredo, E. M. Jagoda, and J. Shirani Evidence for Tissue Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme in Explanted Hearts of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Targeted Radiotracer Technique J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 182 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jin, S. Takai, M. Yamada, M. Sakaguchi, K. Kamoshita, K. Ishida, Y. Sukenaga, and M. Miyazaki Impact of chymase inhibitor on cardiac function and survival after myocardial infarction Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2003; 60(2): 413 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Takahashi, J. R. Hagaman, H.-S. Kim, and O. Smithies Minireview: Computer Simulations of Blood Pressure Regulation by the Renin-Angiotensin System Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2184 - 2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jong, C. Demers, R. S. McKelvie, and P. P. Liu Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 6, 2002; 39(3): 463 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, C. M. Kramer, S. Mankad, S.-e. Yoo, and K. Sandberg Combined angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade up-regulates myocardial AT2 receptors in remodeled myocardium post-infarction Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2001; 51(1): 131 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S Weinberg, A. J Weinberg, and D. H Zappe Effectively targetting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cardiovascular and renal disease: rationale for using angiotensin II receptor blockers in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2000; 1(3): 217 - 233. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |