|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:750-758 © 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
a Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Manuscript received June 4, 1998; revised manuscript received September 23, 1998, accepted November 18, 1998.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. T. Marwick, University Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
tmarwick{at}medicine.pa.uq.edu.au
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative clinical and test data could be used to predict the effects of myocardial revascularization on functional status and quality of life in patients with heart failure and ischemic LV dysfunction.
BACKGROUND
Revascularization of viable myocardial segments has been shown to improve regional and global LV function. The effects of revascularization on exercise capacity and quality of life (QOL) are not well defined.
METHODS
Sixty three patients (51 men, age 66 ± 9 years) with moderate or worse LV dysfunction (LVEF 0.28 ± 0.07) and symptomatic heart failure were studied before and after coronary artery bypass surgery. All patients underwent preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) using FDG and Rb-82 before and after dipyridamole stress; the extent of viable myocardium by PET was defined by the number of segments with metabolism-perfusion mismatch or ischemia. Dobutamine echocardiography (DbE) was performed in 47 patients; viability was defined by augmentation at low dose or the development of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities. Functional class, exercise testing and a QOL score (Nottingham Health Profile) were obtained at baseline and follow-up.
RESULTS
Patients had wall motion abnormalities in 83 ± 18% of LV segments. A mismatch pattern was identified in 12 ± 15% of LV segments, and PET evidence of viability was detected in 30 ± 21% of the LV. Viability was reported in 43 ± 18% of the LV by DbE. The difference between pre- and postoperative exercise capacity ranged from a reduction of 2.8 to an augmentation of 5.2 METS. The degree of improvement of exercise capacity correlated with the extent of viability by PET (r = 0.54, p = 0.0001) but not the extent of viable myocardium by DbE (r = 0.02, p = 0.92). The area under the ROC curve for PET (0.76) exceeded that for DbE (0.66). In a multiple linear regression, the extent of viability by PET and nitrate use were the only independent predictors of improvement of exercise capacity (model r = 0.63, p = 0.0001). Change in Functional Class correlated weakly with the change in exercise capacity (r = 0.25), extent of viable myocardium by PET (r = 0.23) and extent of viability by DbE (r = 0.31). Four components of the quality of life score (energy, pain, emotion and mobility status) significantly improved over follow-up, but no correlations could be identified between quality of life scores and the results of preoperative testing or changes in exercise capacity.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with LV dysfunction, improvement of exercise capacity correlates with the extent of viable myocardium. Quality of life improves in most patients undergoing revascularization. However, its measurement by this index does not correlate with changes in other parameters nor is it readily predictable.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, J. Kasprzak, P. Lancellotti, D. Poldermans, J.-U. Voigt, J. L. Zamorano, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC) Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 415 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Spoor and S. F. Bolling Nontransplant Surgical Options for Heart Failure Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1639 - 1648. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. F.L. Schinkel, D. Poldermans, A. Elhendy, and J. J. Bax Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Patients with Heart Failure J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1135 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Di Carli and R. Hachamovitch New Technology for Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, March 20, 2007; 115(11): 1464 - 1480. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Brogsitter, T. Gruning, R. Weise, P. Wielepp, O. Lindner, R. Korfer, and W. Burchert 18F-FDG PET for Detecting Myocardial Viability: Validation of 3D Data Acquisition J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 19 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Bach Viability, prognosis, revascularization, and pascal J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 17, 2003; 42(12): 2106 - 2108. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Shah, D. L. Hare, J. S. Raman, I. Gordon, R. K. Chan, J. D. Horowitz, A. Rosalion, and B. F. Buxton Survival after myocardial revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy: A prospective ten-year follow-up study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1320 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Kang, D. S. Lee, J. C. Paeng, K.-B. Kim, J.-K. Chung, and M. C. Lee Prognostic Value of Rest 201Tl-Dipyridamole Stress 99mTc-Sestamibi Gated SPECT for Predicting Patient-Based Clinical Outcomes After Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1735 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F.L. Schinkel, J. J. Bax, R. van Domburg, A. Elhendy, R. Valkema, E. C. Vourvouri, F. B. Sozzi, J. R.T.C. Roelandt, and D. Poldermans Dobutamine-Induced Contractile Reserve in Stunned, Hibernating, and Scarred Myocardium in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Badhwar and S. F. Bolling Nontransplant Surgical Options for Heart Failure Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1515 - 1526. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gimelli, J. A. M. Neto, C. Marcassa, P. Ferrazzi, M. Glauber, and P. Marzullo Beneficial effects of coronary revascularization in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction with and without anginal symptoms Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2002; 1(1): 9 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Allman, L. J. Shaw, R. Hachamovitch, and J. E. Udelson Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2002; 39(7): 1151 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Bonow Myocardial viability and prognosis in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2002; 39(7): 1159 - 1162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Corretti, T. J. Anderson, E. J. Benjamin, D. Celermajer, F. Charbonneau, M. A. Creager, J. Deanfield, H. Drexler, M. Gerhard-Herman, D. Herrington, et al. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: A report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Luciani, G. Montalbano, G. Casali, and A. Mazzucco Predicting long-term functional results after myocardial revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2000; 120(3): 478 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Beller and B. L. Zaret Contributions of Nuclear Cardiology to Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, March 28, 2000; 101(12): 1465 - 1478. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |