This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beleslin, B. D. Articles by Kanjuh, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beleslin, B. D. Articles by Kanjuh, V.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Integrated evaluation of relation between coronary lesion features and stress echocardiography results: the importance of coronary lesion morphology

^a University Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Department for Diagnostic and Catheterization Labs., 8 Koste Todorovica, 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia

Manuscript received May 13, 1998; revised manuscript received October 9, 1998, accepted November 16, 1998.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Miodrag Ostojic, University Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Department of Diagnostic and Catheterization Labs., 8 Koste Todorovica, 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia
miodrag.ostojic{at}kcs.ac.yu

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze, in the same group of patients, the relationship between multiple variables of coronary lesion and results of exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography tests.

BACKGROUND

Integrated evaluation of the relation between stress echocardiography results and angiographic variables should include not only the assessment of stenosis severity but also evaluation of other quantitative and qualitative features of coronary stenosis.

METHODS

Study population consisted of 168 (138 male, 30 female, mean age 51 ± 9 years) patients, on whom exercise (Bruce treadmill protocol), dobutamine (up to 40 mcg/kg/min) and dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg over 10 min) stress echocardiography tests were performed. Stress echocardiography test was considered positive for myocardial ischemia when a new wall motion abnormality was observed. One-vessel coronary stenosis ranging from mild stenosis to complete obstruction of the vessel was present in 153 patients, and 15 patients had normal coronary arteries. The observed angiographic variables included particular coronary vessel, stenosis location, the presence of collaterals, plaque morphology according to Ambrose classification, percent diameter stenosis and obstruction diameter as assessed by quantitative coronary arteriography.

RESULTS

Covariates significantly associated with the results of physical and pharmacological stress tests included for all three stress modalities presence of collateral circulation, percent diameter stenosis and obstruction diameter, as well as lesion morphology (p < 0.05 for all, except collaterals for dobutamine stress test, p = 0.06). By stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, the strongest predictor of the outcome of exercise echocardiography test was only percent diameter stenosis (p = 0.0002). However, both dobutamine and particularly dipyridamole stress echocardiography results were associated not only with stenosis severity - percent diameter stenosis (dobutamine, p = 0.04; dipyridamole, p = 0.003) - but also, and even more strongly, with lesion morphology (dobutamine, p = 0.006; dipyridamole, p = 0.0009). As all of stress echocardiography results were significantly associated with percent diameter stenosis, the best angiographic cutoff in relation to the results of stress echocardiography test was: exercise, 54%; dobutamine, 58% and dipyridamole, 60% (p < 0.05 vs. exercise).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated evaluation of angiographic variables have shown that the results of dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography are not only influenced by stenosis severity but also, and even more importantly, by plaque morphology. The results of exercise stress echocardiography, although separately influenced by plaque morphology, are predominantly influenced by stenosis severity, due to a stronger exercise capacity in provoking myocardial ischemia in milder forms of coronary stenosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R Senior, M Monaghan, H Becher, J Mayet, and P Nihoyannopoulos Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography Heart, April 1, 2005; 91(4): 427 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Lancellotti, T Benoit, P Rigo, and L A Pierard Dobutamine stress echocardiography versus quantitative technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT for detecting residual stenosis and multivessel disease after myocardial infarction Heart, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 510 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.A. Pierard Evaluating risk in unstable angina: role of pharmacological stress echocardiography Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2000; 21(13): 1041 - 1043. [PDF]

				A. Pingitore, E. Picano, A. Varga, G. Gigli, L. Cortigiani, M. Previtali, G. Minardi, M. Quarta Colosso, J. Lowenstein, W. Mathias Jr., et al. Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: A prospective, large-scale, multicenter, head-to-head comparison between dipyridamole and dobutamine test J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1999; 34(6): 1769 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]