|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1987-1995 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |


* Department of Imaging (Division of Nuclear Medicine), Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), and CSMC Burns & Allen Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
b Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Manuscript received March 17, 1998; revised manuscript received July 21, 1998, accepted August 6, 1998.
Address for correspondence: Daniel S. Berman, MD, Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Room A042, Los Angeles, California 90048
bermand{at}cshs.org
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis in exercise dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and to compare the prognostic value of quantitative analysis to semiquantitative visual SPECT analysis.
Background. Extent, severity and reversibility of exercise myocardial perfusion defects have been shown to correlate with prognosis. However, most studies examining the prognostic value of SPECT in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) have been based on visual analysis by experts.
Methods. We studied 1,043 consecutive patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent rest Tl-201/exercise Tc-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT and were followed up for at least 1 year (mean 20.0 ± 3.7 months). After censoring 59 patients with early coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, <60 days after nuclear testing, the final population consisted of 984 patients (36% women, mean age 63 ± 12 years).
Results. During the follow-up period, 28 hard events (14 cardiac deaths, 14 nonfatal myocardial infarctions) occurred. Patients with higher defect extent (>10%), severity (>150) and reversibility (>5%) by quantitative SPECT defect analysis, as well as those with an abnormal scan (>2 abnormal segments, summed stress score >4 and summed difference score >2) by semiquantitative visual SPECT analysis, had a significantly higher hard event rate compared to patients with a normal scan (p < 0.001). With both visual and quantitative analyses, hard event rates of approximately 1% with normal scans and 5% with abnormal scans (p > 0.05) were observed over the 20-month follow-up period. A Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that chi-square increased similarly with the addition of quantitative defect extent and visual summed stress score variables after considering both clinical and exercise variables (improvement chi-square = 11 for both, p < 0.0007). There were no significant differences in the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves between quantitative and visual analysis (p > 0.70). Linear regression analysis also indicated that quantitative assessments correlated well with visual semiquantitative assessments.
Conclusions. The findings of this study indicate that automatic quantitative analysis of exercise stress myocardial perfusion SPECT is similar to semiquantitative expert visual analysis for prognostic stratification. These findings may be of particular clinical importance in laboratories with less experienced visual interpreters.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. D. Metz, M. Beattie, R. Hom, R. F. Redberg, D. Grady, and K. E. Fleischmann The Prognostic Value of Normal Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Exercise Echocardiography: A Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 227 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshinaga, B. J.W. Chow, K. Williams, L. Chen, R. A. deKemp, L. Garrard, A. Lok-Tin Szeto, M. Aung, R. A. Davies, T. D. Ruddy, et al. What is the Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D. S. Berman A prognostic score for prediction of cardiac mortality risk after adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2005; 45(5): 722 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch and M. F. Di Carli Are Human Readers Needed for Prognostication from Stress Myocardial Perfusion SPECT? Using Outcomes Research to Validate Medical Technology J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 194 - 197. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D. Leslie, S. A. Tully, M. S. Yogendran, L. M. Ward, K. A. Nour, and C. J. Metge Prognostic Value of Automated Quantification of 99mTc-Sestamibi Myocardial Perfusion Imaging J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 204 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Aboul-Enein, S. Kar, S. W. Hayes, M. Sciammarella, A. Abidov, R. Makkar, J. D. Friedman, N. Eigler, and D. S. Berman Influence of Angiographic Collateral Circulation on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion of a Single Coronary Artery and No Prior Myocardial Infarction J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 950 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D. S. Berman Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 200 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, X. Kang, G. Germano, and D. S. Berman Is there a referral bias againstcatheterization of patients withreduced left ventricular ejection fraction?: Influence of ejection fraction and inducible ischemia onpost-single-photon emission computed tomographymanagement of patients without a history of coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2003; 42(7): 1286 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D. S. Berman Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Circulation, June 17, 2003; 107(23): 2900 - 2907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch, S. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, L. J. Shaw, G. Germano, and D. S. Berman Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: What is the warranty period of a normal scan? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 16, 2003; 41(8): 1329 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Corbett and E. P. Ficaro Gated SPECT and the Visual Gold Standard: Gold Standard or Not? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2001; 42(11): 1639 - 1642. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Zellweger, H. C. Lewin, S. Lai, E. A. Dubois, J. D. Friedman, G. Germano, X. Kang, T. Sharir, and D. S. Berman When to stress patients after coronary artery bypass surgery?: Risk stratification in patients early and late post-CABG using stress myocardial perfusion SPECT: implications of apppropriate clinical strategies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 144 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Vanzetto, O. Ormezzano, D. Fagret, M. Comet, B. Denis, and J. Machecourt Long-Term Additive Prognostic Value of Thallium-201 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Over Clinical and Exercise Stress Test in Low to Intermediate Risk Patients : Study in 1137 Patients With 6-Year Follow-Up Circulation, October 5, 1999; 100(14): 1521 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |