This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arsenault, M. Articles by Pandian, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Arsenault, M. Articles by Pandian, N.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data

^a Non-invasive Cardiac Imaging Laboratory, Tufts University, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Manuscript received April 22, 1998; revised manuscript received August 3, 1998, accepted August 26, 1998.

Address for correspondence: Dr. Marie Arsenault, Cardiac Ultrasound Imaging Laboratory, Institut de Cardiologie de Québec, Hôpital Laval, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Ste-Foy, Canada
marie.arsenault{at}hopitallaval.qc.ca

Objectives. Flow variations can affect valve-area calculation in aortic stenosis and lead to inaccuracies in the evaluation of the stenosis. Knowing that transvalvular flow varies normally within one beat, we designed this study to assess the response of the valve to intrabeat variation of flow during systole. Results were compared with flow-derived measurements.

Background. Technological improvements now allow us to evaluate aortic valve area directly by short axis planimetry. This offers the possibility to perform serial planimetries during one ejection phase and analyze the intrabeat dynamic behavior of the stenotic-aortic valve and compare these measurements with flow-derived measurements.

Methods. Forty echocardiograms displaying different degrees of aortic stenosis were analyzed by frame-by-frame planimetry of the valve area from onset of opening to complete closure. Maximal-mean area, opening and closing rates and ejection times were obtained and compared with Doppler-derived data.

Results. Valve area varied during ejection. Stenotic valves opened and closed more slowly than normals and remained maximally open for a shorter period. Mean area by Doppler data corresponded more closely to maximal than to mean-planimetered area. Duration of flow was shorter than valve opening in severely stenotic valves. Discrepancies between Doppler-derived and two-dimensional (2D) measurements decreased in less stenotic valves.

Conclusions. Our observations reveal striking differences between the dynamics of normal and stenotic valves. Surprisingly, Doppler-derived mean-valve area correlated better with maximal-anatomic area than with mean-anatomic area in patients with aortic stenosis. Discrepancies between duration of flow and valve opening could explain this phenomenon.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   AVA = aortic valve area   FVI = flow-velocity integrals   LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract   TEE = transesophageal echocardiogram   TTE = transthoracic echocardiogram   2D = two-dimensional

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 131 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 14, 2005; (2005) j.jacc.2005.05.100v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Messika-Zeitoun, S. Fung Yiu, B. Cormier, B. Iung, C. Scott, A. Vahanian, A Jamil Tajik, and M. Enriquez-Sarano Sequential assessment of mitral valve area during diastole using colour M-mode flow convergence analysis: new insights into mitral stenosis physiology Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2003; 24(13): 1244 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Das, H. Rimington, N. Smeeton, and J. Chambers Determinants of symptoms and exercise capacity in aortic stenosis: a comparison of resting haemodynamics and valve compliance during dobutamine stress Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2003; 24(13): 1254 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Handke, G. Heinrichs, F. Beyersdorf, M. Olschewski, C. Bode, and A. Geibel In vivo analysis of aortic valve dynamics by transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography with high temporal resolution J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1412 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Gray and A. C. Perrino Jr. Hemodynamic-Induced Changes in Aortic Valve Area: Implications for Doppler Cardiac Output Determinations Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2001; 92(3): 584 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Lester, D. B. McElhinney, J. P. Miller, J. T. Lutz, C. M. Otto, and R. F. Redberg Rate of Change in Aortic Valve Area During a Cardiac Cycle Can Predict the Rate of Hemodynamic Progression of Aortic Stenosis Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101(16): 1947 - 1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]