This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tsang, T. S. M. Articles by Seward, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tsang, T. S. M. Articles by Seward, J. B.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Rescue echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis for cardiac perforation complicating catheter-based procedures

The Mayo Clinic experience

^a Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Manuscript received April 13, 1998; revised manuscript received June 24, 1998, accepted July 9, 1998.

Address for correspondence: Dr. William K. Freeman, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of rescue echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis as a primary strategy for the management of acute cardiac perforation and tamponade complicating catheter-based procedures.

Background. In this era of interventional catheterization, acute tamponade from cardiac perforation as a complication is encountered more frequently. The safety and efficacy of echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis in this life-threatening situation and outcomes of patients managed by this technique are unknown.

Methods. Of the 960 consecutive echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses performed at the Mayo Clinic (1979 to 1997), 92 (9.6%) were undertaken in 88 patients with acute tamponade that developed in association with a diagnostic or interventional catheter-based procedure. Most of the patients were hemodynamically unstable at the time of pericardiocentesis, with clinically overt tamponade in 40% and frank hemodynamic collapse (systolic blood pressure <60 mm Hg) in 57%. Clinical end points of interest were the success and complication rates of rescue pericardiocentesis and patient outcomes, including the need for other interventions, clinical and echocardiographic follow-up findings and survival.

Results. Rescue pericardiocentesis was successful in relieving tamponade in 91 cases (99%) and was the only and definitive therapy in 82% of the cases. Major complications (3%) included pneumothorax (n = 1), right ventricular laceration (n = 1) and intercostal vessel injury with right ventricular laceration (n = 1); all were treated successfully. Minor complications (2%) included a small pneumothorax and an instance of transient nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; all were resolved spontaneously. Further surgical intervention was performed in 16 patients (18%). No deaths resulted from the rescue pericardiocentesis procedure itself. Early death (<30 days) in this series was due to injuries from cardiac catheter-based procedures (n = 3), perioperative complications (n = 2) and underlying cardiac diseases (n = 2). Clinical or echocardiographic follow-up for a minimum of 3 months or until death (if <3 months) for recurrent effusion or development of pericardial constriction was achieved in 87 (99%) of the patients.

Conclusions. Echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis was safe and effective for rescuing patients from tamponade and reversing hemodynamic instability complicating invasive cardiac catheter-based procedures. For most patients, this was the definitive and only therapy necessary.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CI = confidence interval   echo = echocardiographically   2D = two-dimensional

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Bahcivan, O. Doyurgan, M. Urkmez, and H. T. Keceligil Successful combination of interventional and surgical treatment of left atrium perforation Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2009; 8(4): 494 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Hosokawa and Y. Nakajima An Evaluation of Acute Cardiac Tamponade by Transesophageal Echocardiography Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 61 - 62. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Restrepo, D. F. Lemos, J. A. Lemos, E. Velasquez, L. Diethelm, T. A. Ovella, S. Martinez, J. Carrillo, R. Moncada, and J. S. Klein Imaging Findings in Cardiac Tamponade with Emphasis on CT RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1595 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Task Force members, B. Maisch, P. M. Seferovic, A. D. Ristic, R. Erbel, R. Rienmuller, Y. Adler, W. Z. Tomkowski, G. Thiene, M. H. Yacoub, et al. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases Executive Summary: The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2004; 25(7): 587 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. M. Tsang, M. Enriquez-Sarano, W. K. Freeman, M. E. Barnes, L. J. Sinak, B. J. Gersh, K. R. Bailey, and J. B. Seward Consecutive 1127 Therapeutic Echocardiographically Guided Pericardiocenteses: Clinical Profile, Practice Patterns, and Outcomes Spanning 21 Years Mayo Clin. Proc., May 1, 2002; 77(5): 429 - 436. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Atar, J. Chiu, J. S. Forrester, and R. J. Siegel Bloody Pericardial Effusion in Patients With Cardiac Tamponade* : Is the Cause Cancerous, Tuberculous, or Iatrogenic in the 1990s? Chest, December 1, 1999; 116(6): 1564 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. M. Tsang, M. E. Barnes, S. N. Hayes, W. K. Freeman, J. A. Dearani, S. L. O. Butler, and J. B. Seward Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics of Significant Pericardial Effusions Following Cardiothoracic Surgery and Outcomes of Echo-Guided Pericardiocentesis for Management: Mayo Clinic Experience, 1979-1998 Chest, August 1, 1999; 116(2): 322 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]