CLINICAL STUDIES
Prevalence and significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with premature ventricular contractions and heart failure treated with vasodilator therapy
Steven N. Singh, MDa,b,c,
Susan G. Fisher, PhDa,b,c,
Peter E. Carson, MDa,b,c,
Ross D. Fletcher, MDa,b,c the Department of Veterans Affairs CHF STAT Investigators
a VA Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
b VA Medical Center, Hines, Illinois, USA
c Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
Manuscript received January 8, 1998;
revised manuscript received June 12, 1998,
accepted June 17, 1998.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Steven N. Singh, VA Medical Center, 50 Irving Street, NW, Room 1E301, Washington, DC 20422 snsingh{at}erols.com
Objectives. This study sought to determine the prevalence and significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in patients with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and heart failure treated with vasodilator therapy.
Background. Heart failure patients with ventricular arrhythmia and NSVT have a significantly increased risk of premature cardiac death. Recently there has been the question of whether these arrhythmias are expressions of a severely compromised ventricle or are they independent risk factors. We, therefore, determined the prevalence and significance of NSVT in patients with PVCs and heart failure and on vasodilator therapy.
Methods. Twenty-four hour ambulatory recordings were done at randomization, at 2 weeks, at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 and then every 6 months in 674 patients with heart failure and on vasodilator therapy. The median period of follow-up was 45 months (range 0 to 54).
Results. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was present in 80% of all patients. Patients without (group 1) and with (group 2) NSVT were balanced for variables: age, etiology of heart disease, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, use of amiodarone and diuretics and left ventricular diameter by echocardiogram. However, group 1 patients had significantly less beta-adrenergic blocking agent use and higher ejection fraction (EF) (p < 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Survival analysis for all deaths showed a greater risk of death among group 2 patients (p = 0.01). Similarly, sudden death was increased in group 2 patients (p = 0.02, risk ratio 1.8). After adjusting for the above variables, only EF (p = 0.001) and NYHA class (p = 0.01) were shown to be independent predictors of survival. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia showed a trend (p = 0.07) as an independent predictor for all-cause mortality but not for sudden death. Only EF was an independent predictor for sudden death.
Conclusions. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia is frequently seen in patients with heart failure and may be associated with worsened survival by univariate analysis. However, after adjusting other variables, especially for EF, NSVT was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality or sudden death. These results have serious implications in that suppression of these arrhythmias may not improve survival.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart, D. P. Zipes, A. J. Camm, M. Borggrefe, A. E. Buxton, B. Chaitman, M. Fromer, G. Gregoratos, G. Klein, A. J. Moss, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 5, 2006;
48(5):
e247 - e346.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Writing Committee Members, D. P. Zipes, A. J. Camm, M. Borggrefe, A. E. Buxton, B. Chaitman, M. Fromer, G. Gregoratos, G. Klein, A. J. Moss, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Europace,
September 1, 2006;
8(9):
746 - 837.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Enseleit and F. Duru
Long-term continuous external electrocardiographic recording: a review.
Europace,
April 1, 2006;
8(4):
255 - 266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G Katritsis and A.J. Camm
Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: where do we stand?
Eur. Heart J.,
July 1, 2004;
25(13):
1093 - 1099.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Kearney, K. A. A. Fox, A. J. Lee, R. J. Prescott, A. M. Shah, P. D. Batin, W. Baig, S. Lindsay, T. S. Callahan, W. E. Shell, et al.
Predicting death due to progressive heart failure in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 20, 2002;
40(10):
1801 - 1808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. V. Huikuri, A. Castellanos, and R. J. Myerburg
Sudden Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmias
N. Engl. J. Med.,
November 15, 2001;
345(20):
1473 - 1482.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Mcmurray
Beta-blockers, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death in heart failure: not as simple as it seems
Eur. Heart J.,
August 1, 2000;
21(15):
1214 - 1215.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Teerlink, M. Jalaluddin, S. Anderson, M. L. Kukin, E. J. Eichhorn, G. Francis, M. Packer, and B. M. Massie
Ambulatory Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Heart Failure Do Not Specifically Predict an Increased Risk of Sudden Death
Circulation,
January 4, 2000;
101(1):
40 - 46.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Zimetbaum and M. E. Josephson
The Evolving Role of Ambulatory Arrhythmia Monitoring in General Clinical Practice
Ann Intern Med,
May 18, 1999;
130(10):
848 - 856.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|