Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:648-654
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sechtem, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sechtem, U.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Significance of rest technetium-99m sestamibi imaging for the prediction of improvement of left ventricular dysfunction after q wave myocardial infarction: importance of infarct location adjusted thresholds

Christian A. Schneider, MDa, Eberhard Voth, MD*, Sybille Gawlich, MDa, Frank M. Baer, MDa, Michael Horst, MD{dagger}, Harald Schicha, MD*, Erland Erdmann, MD, FACCa and Udo Sechtem, MD, FACC{ddagger}

a Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Köln, Germany
* Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin der Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany
{dagger} Klinik und Poliklinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie, Stuttgart, Germany
{ddagger} Robert-Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany

Manuscript received November 14, 1997; revised manuscript received April 24, 1998, accepted May 8, 1998.

Address for correspondence: Dr. C. Schneider, Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, 50934 Köln, Germany

Objective. The value of rest technetium-99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi scintigraphy under oral nitrate medication to predict myocardial viability was examined in patients with chronic infarcts.

Background. The value of rest Tc-99m sestamibi to predict viability in infarct regions has not been fully established because significant underestimation of viability, especially in the inferior myocardial wall, has been reported.

Methods. Forty patients with Q wave myocardial infarction underwent Tc-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography under nitrate medication before revascularization of the infarct-related artery. Wall motion was quantified from paired angiograms before and 4 months after revascularization. Tracer uptake was quantified in the central infarct region identified on the angiogram.

Results. The average Tc-99m sestamibi uptake in the central infarct region of patients with anterior infarcts and improvement of left ventricular function was significantly higher (68 ± 12%, mean ± SD) than in patients without improvement of function (40 ± 14%, p < 0.02). The average Tc-99m sestamibi uptake in the central infarct region of patients with improvement of function and inferior infarcts was significantly lower (43 ± 7%) than in patients with anterior infarcts (68 ± 12%, p < 0.003), but was significantly higher than in patients with inferior infarction and no improvement of function (31 ± 7%, p < 0.02). Using an infarct location adjusted optimal threshold (50% for anterior infarcts, 35% for inferior infarcts), Tc-99m sestamibi had a positive predictive value of 90% and a negative predictive value of 91% for improvement of left ventricular function.

Conclusion. Quantitative rest Tc-99m sestamibi scintigraphy after oral nitrates reliably predicts improvement of left ventricular function after revascularization if infarct location adjusted thresholds are used.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  FDG = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
  PET = positron emission tomography
  RAO = right anterior oblique
  SD = standard deviation
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography
  Tl-201 = thallium-201
  Tc-99m = technetium-99m




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
R. Pfister, H. Diedrichs, A. Schiedermair, S. Rosenkranz, M. Hellmich, E. Erdmann, and C. A. Schneider
Prognostic impact of NT-proBNP and renal function in comparison to contemporary multi-marker risk scores in heart failure patients
Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. F.L. Schinkel, D. Poldermans, A. Elhendy, and J. J. Bax
Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Patients with Heart Failure
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1135 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J J Bax, E E van der Wall, and M Harbinson
Radionuclide techniques for the assessment of myocardial viability and hibernation
Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(suppl_5): v26 - v33.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Sciagra, M. Pellegri, A. Pupi, L. Bolognese, G. Bisi, V. Carnovale, and G. M. Santoro
Prognostic implications of Tc-99m sestamibi viability imaging and subsequent therapeutic strategy in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 739 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement