|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:572-576 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
a Wake Heart Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Manuscript received February 4, 1998; revised manuscript received April 24, 1998, accepted May 11, 1998.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Tift Mann, Wake Heart Associates, 3020 New Bern Avenue, Suite 520, Raleigh, NC 27610
Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to compare the radial approach with the femoral approach for coronary stenting in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Background. Aggressive anticoagulation in patients with acute coronary syndromes increases the risk of femoral vascular complications. The transradial approach has the potential to significantly reduce the incidence of access site bleeding complications in this group of patients.
Methods. One hundred forty-two patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary stenting were prospectively randomized to have their procedure performed from either the radial or femoral access site and the results compared.
Results. Nine of 74 patients randomized to the radial group crossed over to the femoral group (6 negative Allen tests, 3 access failures). Patient demographics were the same in both groups. Primary success was identical: 96% radial, 96% femoral, ns. There were no procedural myocardial infarctions or deaths, and no patient was referred for emergency bypass surgery. There were no access site bleeding complications in the radial group as opposed to 3 (4%) in the femoral group, p < 0.01. Postprocedure length of stay, days (1.4 ± 0.2 radial vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 femoral, p < 0.01) as well as total hospital length of stay (3.0 ± 0.3 radial vs. 4.5 ± 0.5 femoral, p < 0.01) were significantly reduced in the radial group. Total hospital charge was also significantly lower in the radial group ($20,476 ± 811 radial versus $23,389 ± 1,180 femoral, p < 0.01).
Conclusion. Coronary stenting from the radial approach is efficacious in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Access site bleeding complications are less, and early ambulation results in a shorter hospital length of stay. There was a 15% reduction in total hospital charge in the radial group.
| ||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. V. Rao, F.-S. Ou, T. Y. Wang, M. T. Roe, R. Brindis, J. S. Rumsfeld, and E. D. Peterson Trends in the Prevalence and Outcomes of Radial and Femoral Approaches to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2008; 1(4): 379 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Brasselet, S. Tassan, P. Nazeyrollas, M. Hamon, and D. Metz Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI Trial Heart, December 1, 2007; 93(12): 1556 - 1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. A. Spencer and P. G. Steg Major bleeding after PCI. Where is our crystal ball? Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2007; 28(16): 1917 - 1919. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. S. Pullakhandam, Z.-j. Yang, S. Thomas, and J. Wasenko Unusual complication of transradial catheterization. Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 794 - 795. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R A. Archbold, N. M Robinson, and R. J Schilling Radial artery access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention BMJ, August 21, 2004; 329(7463): 443 - 446. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Agostoni, G. G. L. Biondi-Zoccai, M. L. De Benedictis, S. Rigattieri, M. Turri, M. Anselmi, C. Vassanelli, P. Zardini, Y. Louvard, and M. Hamon Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 349 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Kwang Soo Cha, Moo Hyun Kim, J.-S. Hung, Jong Soo Woo, Young Dae Kim, and Jong Seong Kim Nonselective Left Internal Mammary Artery Angiography During Right Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Simple, Rapid, and Safe Technique Angiology, November 1, 2001; 52(11): 773 - 779. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Loubeyre, T Lefevre, Y Louvard, P Dumas, J.-F Piechaud, J.-J Lanore, J.-F Angellier, J.-Y Le Tarnec, G Karrillon, A Margenet, et al. Outcome after combined reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction, combining pre-hospital thrombolysis with immediate percutaneous coronary intervention and stent Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2001; 22(13): 1128 - 1135. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Choussat, A Black, I Bossi, J Fajadet, and J Marco Vascular complications and clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty with platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral arterial access Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 662 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. MANN The radial approach for coronary angiography and stenting Heart, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 411 - 412. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. E. Chambers, S. T Riebel, and M. Kozak Interventional Cardiology: Advances in Percutaneous Techniques for the Treatment of Cardiac Disease Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 1999; 3(2): 109 - 125. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
