Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:305-310
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirnes, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kjekshus, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirnes, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kjekshus, J.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Sustained benefit of stenting chronic coronary occlusion: long-term clinical follow-up of the Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO) study

Per Anton Sirnes, MD, Svein Golf, MD, PhDa, Yngvar Myreng, MD, PhDa, Per Mølstad, MD, PhDa, Per Albertsson, MD, PhD*, Arild Mangschau, MD, PhD{dagger}, Knut Endresen, MD, PhD{ddagger} and John Kjekshus, MD, PhD{ddagger}

a The Feiring Heart Clinic, Feiring, Norway
* Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
{dagger} Ullevål Hospital, Oslo, Norway
{ddagger} National Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Manuscript received December 18, 1997; revised manuscript received April 6, 1998, accepted April 23, 1998.

Address for correspondence: Dr. Per Anton Sirnes, The Feiring Heart Clinic, N-2093 Feiring, Norway
psirnes{at}online.no

Objectives. This study assessed the long-term clinical outcome of stenting chronic occlusions.

Background. In the Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO) study, patients were randomized to additional stent implantation (n = 58) or not (n = 59) after successful recanalization and dilation of a chronic coronary occlusion. Palmaz-Schatz stents were used with full anticoagulation. The previously published 6-month angiographic follow-up results showed reduction of the restenosis rate from 74% to 32%.

Methods. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, lesion-related acute myocardial infarction, repeat lesion-related revascularization or angiographic documentation of reocclusion).

Results. Late clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 33 ± 6 months. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 14 patients (24.1%) in the stent group compared with 35 patients (59.3%) in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) group (odds ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.49, p = 0.0002). Target vessel revascularization (including failed PTCA attempts) was performed in 24% of the stent group and in 53% of the PTCA group (p = 0.002). There were no events in the stent group after 8 months, whereas events continued to occur in the PTCA group. By multivariate analysis, allocation to the PTCA group, left anterior descending coronary artery lesion and lesion length were significantly related to the development of major adverse cardiac events.

Conclusions. These data demonstrate the long-term safety and clinical benefit of stenting recanalized chronic occlusions. There is a continued risk of late clinical events related to nonstented lesions. Implantation of an intracoronary stent should therefore be considered after successful opening of a chronic coronary occlusion.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AMI = acute myocardial infarction
  CI = confidence interval
  DS = diameter stenosis
  LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery
  MLD = minimal lumen diameter
  OR = odds ratio
  PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
  SICCO = Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion
  TLR = target lesion revascularization
  TVR = target vessel revascularization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. W. Stone, N. J. Reifart, I. Moussa, A. Hoye, D. A. Cox, A. Colombo, D. S. Baim, P. S. Teirstein, B. H. Strauss, M. Selmon, et al.
Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronically Occluded Coronary Arteries: A Consensus Document: Part II
Circulation, October 18, 2005; 112(16): 2530 - 2537.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
C.-C. Fang, Y. T. F. N. Jao, Y. Chen, and S.-P. Wang
Coronary Stenting or Balloon Angioplasty for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: The Taiwan Experience (A Single-Center Report)
Angiology, September 1, 2005; 56(5): 525 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Rubartelli, E. Verna, L. Niccoli, C. Giachero, M. Zimarino, G. Bernardi, C. Vassanelli, L. Campolo, E. Martuscelli, and Gruppo Italiano di Studio sullo Stent nelle Occlus
Coronary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty for chronic coronary occlusions: Six-year clinical follow-up of the GISSOC trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1488 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Garcia and J. P. Carrozza Jr
Stenting chroniccoronary artery occlusions: One step closer?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1493 - 1495.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. J. Popma, M. Suntharalingam, A. J. Lansky, R. R. Heuser, B. Speiser, P. S. Teirstein, V. Massullo, T. Bass, R. Henderson, S. Silber, et al.
Randomized Trial of 90Sr/90Y {beta}-Radiation Versus Placebo Control for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis
Circulation, August 27, 2002; 106(9): 1090 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. S. Werner, M. Ferrari, B. M. Richartz, O. Gastmann, and H. R. Figulla
Microvascular Dysfunction in Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions
Circulation, September 4, 2001; 104(10): 1129 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D.P. Foley, M. Pieper, W. Wijns, H. Suryapranata, G. Grollier, V. Legrand, I. de Scheerder, C. Hanet, J. Puel, H. Mudra, et al.
The influence of stent length on clinical and angiographic outcome in patients undergoing elective stenting for native coronary artery lesions; final results of the Magic 5L Study
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2001; 22(17): 1585 - 1593.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. W. Serruys, B. de Bruyne, S. Carlier, J. E. Sousa, J. Piek, T. Muramatsu, C. Vrints, P. Probst, R. Seabra-Gomes, I. Simpson, et al.
Randomized Comparison of Primary Stenting and Provisional Balloon Angioplasty Guided by Flow Velocity Measurement
Circulation, December 12, 2000; 102(24): 2930 - 2937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P.J. De Feyter and D. Foley
Coronary stent implantation: a panacea for the interventional cardiologist?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2000; 21(21): 1719 - 1726.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Meier
The stent, the Procrustes for chronic total coronary occlusions?
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 1999; 20(16): 1142 - 1144.
[PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement