|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:275-282 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |



a Heart Institute, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Division of Biometry, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Department of Health Policy and Management, State University of New York, Albany, New York, USA
Department of Medicine, Center for the Evaluative Health Sciences, Dartmouth/Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
|| Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Manuscript received May 14, 1997; revised manuscript received March 11, 1998, accepted April 9, 1998.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Peter C. Block, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, 9205 SW Barnes Rd., Portland, Oregon 97225
peter_block_md{at}phsor.org
Objectives. Our objectives were to identify and define a minimum set of variables for interventional cardiology that carried the most statistical weight for predicting adverse outcomes. Though "gaming" cannot be completely avoided, variables were to be as objective as possible and reproducible and had to be predictive of outcome in current databases.
Background. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions depend on patient risk characteristics and disease severity and acuity. Comparing results of interventions has been difficult because definitions of similar variables differ in databases, and variables are not uniformly tracked. Identifying the best predictor variables and standardizing their definitions are a first step in developing a universal stratification instrument.
Methods. A list of empirically derived variables was first tested in eight cardiac databases (158,273 cases). Three end points (in-hospital death, in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery, Q wave myocardial infarction) were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to quantify the predictive value of the variable in each database. The variables were then defined by consensus by a panel of experts.
Results. In all databases patient demographics were similar, but disease severity varied greatly. The most powerful predictors of adverse outcome were measures of hemodynamic instability, disease severity, demographics and comorbid conditions in both univariate and multivariate analyses.
Conclusions. Our analysis identified 29 variables that have the strongest statistical association with adverse outcomes after coronary interventions. These variables were also objectively defined. Incorporation of these variables into every cardiac dataset will provide uniform standards for data collected. Comparisons of outcomes among physicians, institutions and databases will therefore be more meaningful.
| ||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Sousa, A. S. Uva, F. Pinto, and on behalf of the investigators of PCI registry of Risk-adjustment model in health outcomes evaluation: a contribution to strengthen assessment towards quality improvement in interventional cardiology Int. J. Qual. Health Care, July 11, 2008; (2008) mzn029v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kunadian, J. Dunning, A. P Roberts, R. Morley, D. Twomey, J. A Hall, A. G C Sutton, R. A Wright, D. F Muir, and M. A d. Belder Cumulative funnel plots for the early detection of interoperator variation: retrospective database analysis of observed versus predicted results of percutaneous coronary intervention BMJ, April 26, 2008; 336(7650): 931 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Haan, S. O'Brien, F. H. Edwards, E. D. Peterson, and T. B. Ferguson Trends in emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after percutaneous coronary intervention, 1994-2003. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1658 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Brinker, C. J. Davidson, and W. Laskey Preventing in-hospital cardiac and renal complications in high-risk PCI patients Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2005; 7(suppl_G): G13 - G24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Flynn, C. Barrett, F. G. Cosio, A. K. Gitt, L. Wallentin, P. Kearney, M. Lonergan, E. Shelley, and M. L. Simoons The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS), European data standards for clinical cardiology practice Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2005; 26(3): 308 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Gold, K. E. Torres, W. Maldarelli, I. Zhuravlev, D. Condit, and J. Wasnick Improving Outcomes in Coronary Surgery: The Impact of Echo-Directed Aortic Cannulation and Perioperative Hemodynamic Management in 500 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1579 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Singh, C. S. Rihal, R. J. Lennon, K. N. Garratt, and D. R. Holmes Jr Comparison of Mayo Clinic risk score and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion classification in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcome following percutaneous coronary interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 357 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Rothenberg, T. Pearson, J. Zwanziger, and D. Mukamel Explaining disparities in access to high-quality cardiac surgeons Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Hlatky Comorbidity andoutcome in patientswith coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 583 - 584. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lotfi, K. Mackie, V. Dzavik, and P. H. Seidelin Impact of delays to cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 337 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Conaway, J. House, K. Bandt, L. Hayden, A. M. Borkon, and J. A. Spertus The elderly: health status benefits and recovery of function one year after coronary artery bypass surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 15, 2003; 42(8): 1421 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Holmes, F. Selzer, J. M. Johnston, S. F. Kelsey, R. Holubkov, H. A. Cohen, D. O. Williams, and K. M. Detre Modeling and Risk Prediction in the Current Era of Interventional Cardiology: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry Circulation, April 15, 2003; 107(14): 1871 - 1876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Malenka, D. E. Wennberg, H. A. Quinton, D. J. O'Rourke, P. D. McGrath, S. J. Shubrooks Jr, G. T. O'Connor, T. J. Ryan Jr, J. F. Robb, M. A. Kellett Jr, et al. Gender-related changes in the practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in northern New England from 1994 to 1999 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2002; 40(12): 2092 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Spertus, P. Jones, M. McDonell, V. Fan, and S. D. Fihn Health Status Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Outpatients With Coronary Disease Circulation, July 2, 2002; 106(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Shaw, H. V. Anderson, R. G. Brindis, R. J. Krone, L. W. Klein, C. R. McKay, P. C. Block, L. J. Shaw, K. Hewitt, W. S. Weintraub, et al. Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) experience: 1998-2000 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2002; 39(7): 1104 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Cowper, E. D. Peterson, E. R. DeLong, M. B. Wightman, R. P. Wawrzynski, L. H. Muhlbaier, and M. H. Sketch Jr The impact of statistical adjustment on economic profiles of interventional cardiologists J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1416 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moscucci, E. Kline-Rogers, D. Share, M. O'Donnell, A. Maxwell-Eward, W. L. Meengs, P. Kraft, A. C. DeFranco, J. L. Chambers, K. Patel, et al. Simple Bedside Additive Tool for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Circulation, July 17, 2001; 104(3): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Bashore, E. R. Bates, P. B. Berger, D. A. Clark, J. T. Cusma, G. J. Dehmer, M. J. Kern, W. K. Laskey, M. P. O'Laughlin, S. Oesterle, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents endorsed by the American Heart Association and the Diagnostic and Interventional Catheterization Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the AHA J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2170 - 2214. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. W. Niles, P. D. McGrath, D. Malenka, H. Quinton, D. Wennberg, S. J. Shubrooks, J. F. Tryzelaar, R. Clough, M. J. Hearne, F. Hernandez Jr, et al. Survival of patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease after surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization: results of a large regional prospective study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 1008 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rodriguez, V. Bernardi, J. Navia, J. Baldi, L. Grinfeld, J. Martinez, D. Vogel, R. Grinfeld, A. Delacasa, M. Garrido, et al. Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 51 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Brooks, R. H. Jones, R. G. Bach, B. R. Chaitman, M. J. Kern, T. A. Orszulak, D. Follmann, G. Sopko, E. H. Blackstone, and R. M. Califf Predictors of Mortality and Mortality From Cardiac Causes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Randomized Trial and Registry Circulation, June 13, 2000; 101(23): 2682 - 2689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lindsay Jr., E. E. Pinnow, and A. D. Pichard Frequency of major adverse cardiac events within one month of coronary angioplasty: a useful measure of operator performance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1999; 34(7): 1916 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. O'Connor, D. J. Malenka, H. Quinton, J. F. Robb, M. A. Kellett Jr., S. Shubrooks, W. A. Bradley, M. J. Hearne, M. W. Watkins, D. E. Wennberg, et al. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions in 1994-1996 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 681 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moscucci, G. T. O'Connor, S. G. Ellis, D. J. Malenka, J. Sievers, E. R. Bates, D. W. M. Muller, S. W. Werns, E. K. Rogers, D. Karavite, et al. Validation of risk adjustment models for in-hospital percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty mortality on an independent data set J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 692 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |