Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:1615-1621
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, C
Right arrow Articles by Sung, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, C
Right arrow Articles by Sung, R.

Demonstration of a posterior atrial input to the atrioventricular node during sustained anterograde slow pathway conduction

C Young, MR Lauer, LB Liem, H Chun, and RJ Sung

Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories, Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa Teresa, San Jose, California, USA. charlie.young@ncal.kaiser.org

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to demonstrate electrophysiologic evidence for the existence of different anatomic atrial input sites of fast and slow conduction pathways in patients with dual atrioventricular (AV) node physiology. BACKGROUND: Although a separate posterior exit site exists for a retrograde slow AV node pathway, it remains unresolved whether a separate atrial input site into the AV node actually exists in patients with dual anterograde AV node pathway physiology. METHODS: In 10 patients with dual AV node pathway physiology, atrial pacing at three chosen drive cycle lengths (DCL1, DCL2 and DCL3) was performed at an anterior site (A) just above the His bundle recording site and at a posterior atrial site (P) just below the coronary sinus ostium. DCL3 was chosen as the one cycle length that resulted in a long AH interval consistent with slow pathway conduction. The stimulus to His bundle conduction times (SH) at both sites (SH(P) and SH(A), respectively) and their differences (deltaSH = SH(P) - SH(A)) at each of the three drive cycle lengths were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD deltaSH values for DCL1 and DCL2 measured 9 +/- 16 and 8 +/- 18 ms, respectively, and the mean deltaSH value at DCL3 measured -34 +/- 24 ms, which was significantly different from the mean deltaSH values at DCL1 and DCL2 (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The significant change in the deltaSH (SH(P) - SH(A)) value during slow pathway conduction could be accounted for by a corresponding shift of anterograde input from an anterior to a posterior entry site to the AV node. These findings support the notion that a separate anterograde entry site of the slow pathway does exist in patients with dual AV node pathway physiology.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. N. Mazgalev and P. J. Tchou
Surface Potentials From the Region of the Atrioventricular Node and Their Relation to Dual Pathway Electrophysiology
Circulation, May 2, 2000; 101(17): 2110 - 2117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement