Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. tka0i0@sp2.power.uni-essen.de

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify and localize significant coronary stenoses on a segmental basis by electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) and intravenous administration of a contrast agent. BACKGROUND: The clinical applicability and limitations of intravenous EBCT coronary angiography have not been defined. METHODS: EBCT was performed within 24 h of selective coronary angiography (SCA) in 28 patients (19 men and 9 women, mean [+/-SD] age 60 +/- 10 years). After examination for coronary calcium, EBCT coronary angiography was performed using overlapping slices (in-plane resolution 0.34 to 0.41 mm) with a nominal slice thickness of 1 mm. Based on quantitative analysis of SCA, lumen diameter narrowing > or = 50% (i.e., significant stenoses) was evaluated in 8 (major) or 12 (including side branches) coronary artery segments, using both two-dimensional (tomographic) and three-dimensional (volume) data sets. RESULTS: Of the 330 segments assessable by SCA, 237 (72%) were visualized by EBCT. The sensitivity (+/-SE) for detection of significant stenoses was 82 +/- 6%; specificity was 88 +/- 2%; positive and negative predictive values were 57 +/- 7% and 96 +/- 2%, respectively; and overall accuracy was 87 +/- 2%. If only eight (major) coronary artery segments were considered, 194 (88%) of 221 segments were visualized, and the overall accuracy was 90 +/- 2%. Seven (18%) of 38 significantly stenotic segments were classified as having < 50% stenoses by EBCT. Six of these segments (86%), but only 9 (29%) of the 31 correctly classified stenotic segments, were severely calcified (area > 20 mm2, p = 0.02). In 23 (12%) of 199 nonstenotic segments falsely classified as having > or = 50% stenosis by EBCT, the lumen diameter was significantly smaller than that of the segments correctly classified as negative (mean [+/-SD] 1.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.1 mm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous EBCT coronary angiography allows for accurate segmental evaluation of significant disease in the major coronary arteries and may be of value for ruling out significant disease. The main determinant of false negative results is substantial segmental calcification, whereas the main determinant of false positive results is small vessel size.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al. Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Rumberger Noncardiac Abnormalities in Diagnostic Cardiac Computed Tomography: Within Normal Limits or We Never Looked! J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 407 - 408. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Rumberger The Promise of Quantitative Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Noninvasive Segmental Coronary Plaque Quantification: Pushing the "Edge" J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 678 - 680. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Lu, N. Zhuang, S.-S. Mao, J. Child, S. Carson, and M. J. Budoff Baseline Heart Rate-adjusted Electrocardiographic Triggering for Coronary Artery Electron-Beam CT Angiography Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 590 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Schoenhagen, S. S. Halliburton, A. E. Stillman, S. A. Kuzmiak, S. E. Nissen, E. M. Tuzcu, and R. D. White Noninvasive Imaging of Coronary Arteries: Current and Future Role of Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 7 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Achenbach Detection of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography: it's all about resolution J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 840 - 841. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, and A. Duerinckx Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1867 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A Abdel Aziz, P. Kumar, N. Bazargani, E. Al-Hato, and N. Al Khaja Assessment of Coronary Bypass Graft Patency by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2003; 11(2): 102 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C R Peebles Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging? Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 591 - 594. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A W Leber, A Knez, C Becker, A Becker, C White, C Thilo, M Reiser, R Haberl, and G Steinbeck Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 633 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hong, K. T. Bae, and T. K. Pilgram Coronary Artery Calcium: Accuracy and Reproducibility of Measurements with Multi-Detector Row CT—Assessment of Effects of Different Thresholds and Quantification Methods Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 795 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Hunold, F. M. Vogt, A. Schmermund, J. F. Debatin, G. Kerkhoff, T. Budde, R. Erbel, K. Ewen, and J. Barkhausen Radiation Exposure during Cardiac CT: Effective Doses at Multi-Detector Row CT and Electron-Beam CT Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 145 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.F. Kopp, S. Schroeder, A. Kuettner, A. Baumbach, C. Georg, R. Kuzo, M. Heuschmid, B. Ohnesorge, K.R. Karsch, and C.D. Claussen Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2002; 23(21): 1714 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Rumberger Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Computed Tomography: Ready to Kick It Up Another Notch? Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2036 - 2038. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. A. Fayad, V. Fuster, K. Nikolaou, and C. Becker Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Plaque Imaging: Current and Potential Future Concepts Circulation, October 8, 2002; 106(15): 2026 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Treede, C. Becker, H. Reichenspurner, A. Knez, C. Detter, M. Reiser, and B. Reichart Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in coronary surgery: first experiences with a new tool for diagnosis of coronary artery disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1398 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Achenbach and W. G. Daniel Noninvasive Coronary Angiography -- An Acceptable Alternative? N. Engl. J. Med., December 27, 2001; 345(26): 1909 - 1910. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Hunold, A Schmermund, R.M Seibel, D.H Gronemeyer, and R Erbel Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2001; 22(18): 1748 - 1758. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Mao, H. Bakhsheshi, B. Lu, S. C. K. Liu, R. J. Oudiz, and M. J. Budoff Effect of Electrocardiogram Triggering on Reproducibility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 707 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hong, C. R. Becker, A. Huber, U. J. Schoepf, B. Ohnesorge, A. Knez, R. Bruning, and M. F. Reiser ECG-gated Reconstructed Multi-Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Varying Trigger Delay on Image Quality Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 712 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Achenbach, T. Giesler, D. Ropers, S. Ulzheimer, H. Derlien, C. Schulte, E. Wenkel, W. Moshage, W. Bautz, W. G. Daniel, et al. Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Contrast-Enhanced, Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography Circulation, May 29, 2001; 103(21): 2535 - 2538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Haberl, A. Becker, A. Leber, A. Knez, C. Becker, C. Lang, R. Bruning, M. Reiser, and G. Steinbeck Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2001; 37(2): 451 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Moshage, S. Achenbach, and W. G. Daniel Novel approaches to the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary-artery disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2001; 16(1): 21 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Achenbach, S. Ulzheimer, U. Baum, M. Kachelrie{beta}, D. Ropers, T. Giesler, W. Bautz, W. G. Daniel, W. A. Kalender, and W. Moshage Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT Circulation, December 5, 2000; 102(23): 2823 - 2828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Lu, R. Dai, H. Bai, S. He, B. Jing, N. Zhuang, R. Gao, Y. Yang, J. Chen, and M. J. Budoff Evaluation of Electron Beam Tomographic Coronary Arteriography with Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Healthy Subjects Angiology, November 1, 2000; 51(11): 895 - 904. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S Achenbach, D Ropers, M Regenfus, G Muschiol, W G Daniel, and W Moshage Contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography to analyse the coronary arteries in patients after acute myocardial infarction Heart, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 489 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. Ohnesorge, T. Flohr, C. Becker, A. F. Kopp, U. J. Schoepf, U. Baum, A. Knez, K. Klingenbeck-Regn, and M. F. Reiser Cardiac Imaging by Means of Electrocardiographically Gated Multisection Spiral CT: Initial Experience Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 564 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Achenbach, D. Ropers, J. Holle, G. Muschiol, W. G. Daniel, and W. Moshage In-Plane Coronary Arterial Motion Velocity: Measurement with Electron-Beam CT Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 457 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. G.M. Hunink, K. M. Kuntz, K. E. Fleischmann, and T. J. Brady Noninvasive Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: Focusing the Development of New Diagnostic Technology Ann Intern Med, November 2, 1999; 131(9): 673 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B J Rensing, A H H Bongaerts, R J van Geuns, P M A van Ooijen, M Oudkerk, and P J de Feyter In vivo assessment of three dimensional coronary anatomy using electron beam computed tomography after intravenous contrast administration Heart, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 523 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Achenbach, W. Moshage, D. Ropers, J. Nossen, and W. G. Daniel Value of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Detection of High-Grade Coronary-Artery Stenoses and Occlusions N. Engl. J. Med., December 31, 1998; 339(27): 1964 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Rensing, A. Bongaerts, R.-J. van Geuns, P. van Ooijen, M. Oudkerk, and P. J. de Feyter Intravenous Coronary Angiography by Electron Beam Computed Tomography : A Clinical Evaluation Circulation, December 8, 1998; 98(23): 2509 - 2512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Kopp, S. Schroeder, A. Kuettner, M. Heuschmid, C. Georg, B. Ohnesorge, R. Kuzo, and C. D. Claussen Coronary Arteries: Retrospectively ECG-gated Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography with Selective Optimization of the Image Reconstruction Window Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 683 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]